USAID was investigating its relationship with Starlink just months before tech billionaire Elon Musk attempted to shut the agency down, according to reports.
The freezes and cuts to the foreign aid department, spearheaded by Musk as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), raise questions of a potential conflict of interest, as Musk is the owner of Starlink, a subsidiary of his company SpaceX.
Newsweek contacted Elon Musk and Starlink through SpaceX via email.
Why It Matters
Fears that Musk and others could use their positions in government to benefit themselves have been around since President Donald Trump won the 2024 election. The move to dismantle USAID is the first major policy decision Musk has made, and the way it is handled will be indicative of how powerful he will be over the next four years.
What To Know
During a hearing at the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Accountability in September, USAID Inspector General Paul K. Martin told Congress that the agency was examining its relationship with Starlink, one of Musk's most prominent tech ventures.
In 2022, USAID and Starlink collaborated to provide 5,000 Starlink terminals to Ukraine, to give the country fighting Russian invasion access to Musk's advanced internet system, operated through SpaceX, as reported by The Lever.
"In addition to another ongoing audit on direct budget support, we are examining USAID's Energy Security Project, USAID's oversight of Starlink Satellite Terminals provided to the Ukrainian government, and USAID's efforts to protect against sexual exploitation and abuse in Ukraine," Martin told Congress.
"When completed, we look forward to sharing the findings of these reports with the subcommittee."
However, one of Musk's first moves as DOGE chief has been to dismantle USAID, convincing the Trump administration that the agency is a waste of federal spending and not fit for purpose.
This raises a potential conflict of interest, as Musk's company was under investigation by USAID shortly before he began calling for the shutdown. Starlink's activity in Eastern Europe has been criticized, with many Russian operatives claiming to have access to Starlink despite Musk's assurances that only Ukraine was using the service.
Additionally, in September last year, Ukrainian forces downed a Russian drone that had a Starlink terminal integrated with its systems, raising questions as to how secure Starlink's operations during the Ukraine war are.
What People Are Saying
President Trump told reporters on Sunday: "USAID has been run by a bunch of radical lunatics and we're getting them out and then we'll make a decision."
Musk said on a livestream on Monday: "As we dug into USAID, it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm it in but that we have actually just a ball of worms. USAID is a ball of worms, there is no apple. And when there is no apple... you've just got to basically get rid of the whole thing. That is why it's got to go. It's beyond repair."
What Happens Next
Musk is continuing to identify ways to reduce federal spending, though Democrats are expected to mount an opposition to the USAID shutdown.
Do you have a story we should be covering? Do you have any questions about this article? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com.
fairness meter
About the writer
Theo Burman is a Newsweek Live News Reporter based in London, U.K. His focus is on U.S. politics and international ... Read more
Conversation
Start a discussion, not a fire. Post with kindness. Read our guidelines here
All Comments
Comment by avangionq.
This may be why Musk is so focused on getting rid of USAID.
Comment by williamnoonanm.
This just gets worse and worse.
Comment by mvaughn9955.
Comment by MR T 2U.
Something very fishy about everything around Musk. This is not how the US government should be acting.
Reply by williamnoonanm.
You are right. But Trump and the millions of his voters could care any less.
Comment by AmanitaTakeabite.
Reply by dhmfmzyt8b.
You can’t be serious. Biden’s war against Russia? Have you heard of the Budapest memorandum? A treaty where we are OBLIGATED to aid Ukraine in the event they were invaded. This isn’t “Biden’s War,” this is us coming to the aid of an ally like we’re supposed to do. The idiocy of you people never ceases to astonish me. And frankly your accusation is a new one, but idiotic nonetheless.
Comment by SandyWeber.
This article explains why musk wants to shut down this agency. We need to get rid of musk first then Trump.
Reply by Ian1961.
How do you get rid of the first non-elected President Musk? It's not like you can vote him out.
Reply by Dannyboyo2.
And what this article's author failed to mention is the fact that the Pentagon picked up the tab to fund Starlink operations in Ukraine back in June 2023.
"SpaceX's Starlink wins Pentagon contract for satellite services to Ukraine" - Reuters
"Pentagon says it’s paying for Elon Musk’s Starlink internet in Ukraine" - The Washington Post
After complaining about how Ukraine's Starlink operations was costing SpaceX too much money back in October 2022.
"Exclusive: Musk’s SpaceX says it can no longer pay for critical satellite services in Ukraine, asks Pentagon to pick up the tab" - CNN
Comment by hansard.nate.
...and there it is....the first of many corruptions....and MAGA won't care on little bit.
Comment by cool839.
well played
Comment by TimAlkhazishvili.
from US-AID to USA-ID..
Comment by bobby_roberts.
The oligarchy is well under way…
And MAGA just cheer it on.
Reply by MayfaireOquinn.
Reply by KeithG666.
Less than 1% of the budget that brings us far more in return, yeah why not be for it unless you are clueless as to how it helps the US and or economy.
But hey if we're ok with losing influence in the world and hurting our economy more while we ostracize our allies and trade partners then your way is the way to go.
