The present chapter first shows that the Formosan languages do not form a single subgroup. This is followed by an examination of different subgrouping hypotheses that have been proposed about the Formosan languages. At a micro-level, we discuss four subgroups (Tsouic, Atayal-Seediq, Amis-Sakizaya, and Sirayaic), which are controversial either linguistically or politically, and we examine the internal relationships of five Formosan languages that show important linguistic variation (Atayal, Bunun, Rukai, Paiwan, and Puyuma).
Access options
Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.
Purchase
Purchase instant access for 1, 7 or 30 days on the home page of this publication.
The present chapter first shows that the Formosan languages do not form a single subgroup. This is followed by an examination of different subgrouping hypotheses that have been proposed about the Formosan languages. At a micro-level, we discuss four subgroups (Tsouic, Atayal-Seediq, Amis-Sakizaya, and Sirayaic), which are controversial either linguistically or politically, and we examine the internal relationships of five Formosan languages that show important linguistic variation (Atayal, Bunun, Rukai, Paiwan, and Puyuma).