Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content

Abstract

Measures of democracy are regularly employed in the statistical analysis of economic, political, and social policy. This paper reviews the measures" setup, strength, and weaknesses across the three most prominent democracy datasets: PolityIV, Freedom House, and Varieties of Democracy. The measures developed by the Varieties of Democracy project outperform Polity2 and Freedom House Index with respect to the underlying definition and measurement scale, as well as the theoretical justification of the aggregation procedure. The three indices display a high level of agreement for those observations included in all three datasets. The most substantial differences between the indices lie in the indices’ coverage, i.e. in their non-missing observations (in Polity2 coding, for example, years during which a country is occupied by foreign powers constitute missing values), the availability of disaggregate data and the above mentioned key areas. This paper clarifies when to proceed with caution, but for the most part advocates the use of Varieties of Democracy in the statistical analysis of democracy.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, et al. (2014) Democracy does cause growth. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Boese VA, Kamin K (2018) ’tis but thy name that is my enemy: On the construction of macro panel datasets in peace economics. Economics of Peace and Security Journal (forthcoming).
Bogaards M (2010) Measures of democratization: From degree to type to war. Political Research Quarterly 63(2): 475–488.
Boix C, Miller M, Rosato S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1523–1554.
Bollen K (1993) Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross-national measures. American Journal of Political Science 37(4): 1207–1230.
Bollen KA (1980) Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review 45(3): 370–390.
Bollen KA, Jackman RW (1985) Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review 50(4): 438–457.
Bollen KA, Jackman RW (1989) Democracy, stability, and dichotomies. American Sociological Review 54(4): 612–621.
Bollen KA, Paxton P (2000) Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 58–86.
Bush SS (2017) The politics of rating freedom: Ideological affinity, private authority, and the freedom in the world ratings. Perspectives on Politics 15(3): 711–731.
Casper G, Tufis C (2003) Correlation versus interchangeability: The limited robustness of empirical findings on democracy using highly correlated data sets. Political Analysis 11(2): 196–203.
Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143(1–2): 67–101.
Coppedge M, Alvarez A, Maldonado C (2008) Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. The Journal of Politics 70(3): 632–647.
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Altman D, et al. (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach. Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 247–267.
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017a) V-dem comparisons and contrasts with other measurement projects. V-Dem Working Paper 2017:45. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2951014## (accessed 21 December 2017).
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017b) V-dem codebook v7. V-Dem Reference Material (2017b). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2968274 (accessed 21 December 2017).
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017c) V-dem dataset v7. Available at: https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-7–1/.
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017d) V-dem country coding units v7. V-Dem Reference Material, Version 7, May 2017. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2968285 (accessed on 21 December 2017).
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017e) V-dem methodology v7. V-Dem Reference Material (2017). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2968284 (accessed on 21 December 2017).
Coppedge M, Gerring J, Lindberg SI, et al. (2017f) V-dem organization and management v7. V-Dem Reference Material (2017). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2968280 (accessed on 21 December 2017).
Crick B (2002) Democracy: A Very Short Introduction, volume 75. Oxford Paperbacks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl RA (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Diamond L (1999) Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eckstein H (1973) Authority patterns: A structural basis for political inquiry. American Political Science Review 67(4): 1142–1161.
Elff M, Ziaja S (2018) Method factors in democracy indicators. Politics and Governance 6(1): 92–104.
Elkins Z (2000) Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 293–300.
Fearon JD, Laitin DD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.
Franco Á, Álvarez-Dardet C, Ruiz MT (2004) Effect of democracy on health: Ecological study. British Medical Journal 329(7480): 1421–1423.
Gates S, Hegre H, Jones MP, et al. (2006) Institutional inconsistency and political instability: Polity duration, 1800–2000. American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 893–908.
Gleditsch KS, Ward MD (1997) Double take: A reexamination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(3): 361–383.
Goertz G (2006) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goldstone JA, Bates RH, Epstein DL, et al. (2010) A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 190–208.
Gurr TR (1974) Persistence and change in political systems, 1800–1971. American Political Science Review 68(4): 1482–1504.
Hegre H (2001) Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review 95(1): 33–48.
Högström J (2013) Does the choice of democracy measure matter? Comparisons between the two leading democracy indices, Freedom House and Polity IV. Government and Opposition 48(2): 201–221.
House F (2017a) Freedom in the world 2016: Anxious dictators, wavering democracies: Global freedom under pressure. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FITW_Report_2016.pdf (accessed on Dec. 1, 2017) .
House F (2017b) Methodology website. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2016/methodology (accessed on Dec. 1, 2017).
Høyland B, Moene K, Willumsen F (2012) The tyranny of international index rankings. Journal of Development Economics 97(1): 1–14.
Huntington SP (1993) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, volume 4. University of Oklahoma Press.
Inkeles A (1991) On Measuring Democracy: Its Consequences and Concomitants. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Knutsen CH (2010) Measuring effective democracy. International Political Science Review 31(2): 109–128.
Knutsen CH (2011) The economic effects of democracy and dictatorship. PhD Thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.
Lindberg SI, Coppedge M, Gerring J, et al. (2014) V-dem: A new way to measure democracy. Journal of Democracy 25(3): 159–169.
Mainwaring S, Brinks D, Pérez-Liñán A (2007) Classifying political regimes in Latin America, 1945–2004. In: Gerardo LM (ed) Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.123–160.
Marquardt KL, Pemstein D (2018) IRT models for expert-coded panel data. Political Analysis 26(4): 431–456.
Marshall MG, Gurr TR, Jaggers K (2017a) Polity IV project: Dataset users’ manual—political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2016. Available at http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html (accessed 06 July 2017).
Marshall MG, Gurr TR, Jaggers K (2017b) Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2016. Available at http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html (accessed 06 July 2017).
Munck GL (2009) Measuring Democracy: A Bridge Between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Munck GL, Verkuilen J (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.
Pemstein D, Meserve SA, Melton J (2010) Democratic compromise: A latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Political Analysis 18(4): 426–449.
Przeworski A, Alvarez M, Cheibub JA, et al. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, volume 3. Cambridge, CA: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitter PC, Karl TL (1991) What democracy is… and is not. Journal of Democracy 2(3): 75–88.
Schumpeter JA (1976 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York: Routledge.
Treier S, Jackman S (2008) Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 201–217.
Vanhanen T (2000) A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research 37(2): 251–265.
Vreeland JR (2008) The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(3): 401–425.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 29, 2019
Issue published: June 2019

Keywords

  1. democracy
  2. Polity
  3. Freedom House
  4. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem)
  5. measurement of democracy

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2019.

Authors

Notes

Vanessa Alexandra Boese, School of Business and Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Spandauer Str.1, Berlin, 10099, Germany. Email: boesevan@hu-berlin.de

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in International Area Studies Review.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9499

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 70 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 78

  1. Does sovereignty help economic growth? A recent reassessment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Effect of Political Regime on the Association of Values with Subje...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Three-Dimensional Corruption Metrics: A Proposal for Integrating Frequ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Regime Type and Data Manipulation: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Rasch model and anchoring vignettes for metrological characterisation ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND SAFETY (RESULTS INDICATED BY...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. In-group we trust, no more? How senders’ legitimacy shapes the success...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Democracy, Egalitarianism and the Homicide Rate: An Empirical Test of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. International Monetary Fund Conditionalities May Weaken the Recipient ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. You have nothing to lose but your chains?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Towards environmental impact of inward foreign direct investment: the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Interpretative structural modeling to social sciences: designing bette...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Climate policy uncertainty and environmental degradation: Does democra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Populism and authoritarianism in the EU: what is the role of the euro?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Toward sustainable energy transition: Unveiling the synergies of democ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. A new dynamic framework is required to assess adaptation limits
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Measuring Political Institutions in the Long Run: A Latent Variable An...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Democracy, accountability, and forest loss: a cross-national analysis ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Corruption and Palm Oil in a Cross-National Perspective: How India Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Freedom House ve Metodolojisi Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme: Dem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Are democratic regime and the magnitude of the informal economy robust...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The political economy of inequality, mobility and redistribution
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The legal foundation of responsible research assessment: An overview o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Policy process theories in autocracies: Key observations, explanatory ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Difficult to Count, Important to Measure: Assessing Democratic Backsli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Social media, quality of democracy, and citizen satisfaction with demo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Reanalysing the link between democracy and economic development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Backsliding among indicators of democratic stability relevant to publi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Government revenue composition and forest loss: A cross‐national study...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Democracy, Peace, and Religion in Nigeria: Can Religion Be Used to Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Connecting Bureaucratic Structures to Forest Loss
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Social media, disinformation, and democracy: how different types of so...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Panel data on the impact of democracy and political stability on econo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Threat or corrective to democracy? The relationship between populism a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Political Accountability and Military Spending
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Episodes of liberalization in autocracies: a new approach to quantitat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Civil War Outcomes and Egalitarian Democracy in Post-Civil War States:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Death by a thousand cuts: measuring autocratic legalism in the Europea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Clientelism and Forest loss in a Macro-Comparative perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Anti-democratic youth? The influence of youth cohort size and quality ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Praising the leader: personalist legitimation strategies and the deter...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. From the Varieties of Democracy to the defense of liberal democracy: V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Unravelling the link between democracy and economic complexity: fresh ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Measuring Partial Democracies: Rules and their Implementation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. UN Peacekeeping and Democratization in Conflict-Affected Countries
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. You Have Nothing to Lose but Your Chains? Re-examining the Hayek-Fried...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. La calidad de la democracia en América: un análisis comparado, 1972-20...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. The power of a promise: whom do governments’ security justifications c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Measuring democracy among ordinary citizens—Challenges to studying dem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Patterns of Democracy over Space and Time
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. An unexpected consensus among diverse ways to measure democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Can democracy aid improve democracy? The European Union’s democracy as...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Financial System Development and Democracy: a Panel Smooth Transition ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Democracy and terrorism in Africa
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Youth Cohort Size, Structural Socioeconomic Conditions, and Youth Prot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. A century of coalitions in battle: Incidence, composition, and perform...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Should we care (more) about data aggregation?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Corrupting Ecologically Unequal Exchange? India and Forest Loss in a C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Democracy Measurement Redux: A Critical Look at Some New Kids on the B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. A Short History of Contestation and Participation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Tariff Revenues Matter for Democratization: Theory and Evidence From t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Using Machine Learning for measuring democracy: A practitioners guide ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Comparing measures of democracy: statistical properties, convergence, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. A business case for democracy: regime type, growth, and growth volatil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Political liberalization and human development: Dynamic effects of pol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. The politics of academic innovation: A cross-national study of the eff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Quality of Democracy Makes a Difference, but Not for Everyone: How Pol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Measuring Governance to Achieve Sustainable Development: Promises and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Marketplace of indicators: inconsistencies between country trends of m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Using Machine Learning for Measuring Democracy: An Update
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Democracy and Terrorism in Africa
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Measuring Governance to Achieve Sustainable Development: Promises and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. New evidence on the oil-democracy nexus utilising the Varieties of Dem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Comparing public communication in democracies and autocracies: automat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Linking democracy and biodiversity conservation: Empirical evidence an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Democratic Legacies: Using Democratic Stock to Assess Norms, Growth, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. What Have We Learned About Political Participation Changing a Financia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

Get access

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.