For Black Gen Zers, the abandonment of diversity initiatives is yet another chapter in a long history of exclusion. These rollbacks feel like personal rejections. Growing up in the South and helping lead on issues such as the CROWN Act in Texas, I’ve seen firsthand how representation matters. The movement to “create a respectful and open world for natural hair” in many ways, represented to many consumers, especially Black Gen Zers, that the retailer had made a deliberate commitment to ensure diverse hair and beauty products. Now, with Target ending its diversity efforts, including product sourcing, we question if it ever truly meant it.
Watching corporations abandon these commitments sends a clear message: Inclusivity was only ever a marketing ploy. This shift comes as Black Gen Zers navigate a landscape of erased Black history, attacks on voting rights and threats to bodily autonomy. The betrayal will shape our political views, brand loyalties and economic decisions for years to come.
The decision to abandon DEI isn’t just morally questionable; it’s a strategic blunder. Companies such as Target, Amazon and McDonald’s are risking more than bad viral social media posts. They’re jeopardizing their long-term viability by alienating the very demographic that will define the future of the market.
Here’s what these brands stand to lose:
Lifelong loyalty: Gen Z has a long memory. Decisions made today will influence our relationship with brands for decades. Abandoning DEI signals that these companies don’t value their most diverse consumers.
Cultural relevance: In a world where social media drives cultural trends, Gen Z wields outsized influence. Brands that fail to align with our values risk becoming irrelevant.
Innovation opportunities: Diversity isn’t just a moral imperative; it’s a driver of innovation. Companies that embrace diverse perspectives are better positioned to create products and campaigns that resonate with a global audience.