For the second year in a row, 2% of Korean University graduates have passed the bar exam! 100 people have passed in the past. "We want to protect our schools" refers to Korean schools. It does not say that they will protect Japanese people in court, but rather that they will "put their compatriots first."

The following is from X

【NatsukiPosted by:

The passing rate for the bar exam for graduates of Korean universities has been 2% for two consecutive years, with 100 people having passed so far. I didn't understand the meaning of "We want to protect our schools," so I looked it up and found out it was about Korean schools. There is no mention anywhere of wanting to protect Japanese people in court. It's all about "compatriotism first."

引用元　https://x.com/xholic_natsu/status/1883538629043355824?s=51&t=y6FRh0RxEu0xkYqbQQsRrQ

Everyone's comments

• I think it's abnormal that the passing rate of the bar exam is 100%. I can't help but wonder if the fairness of the exam is really being maintained.
• The very fact that people who advocate the principle of putting their fellow citizens first enter the Japanese judiciary is likely to pose a risk in the future.
• If those who are meant to uphold the law continue to give priority to certain ethnic groups or groups, Japan's legal order will collapse.
• If one uses his position as a lawyer to prioritize the interests of his fellow citizens, that is far from judicial fairness.
• It makes me feel really frustrated to think that the consequences of the Democratic Party administration are now coming back to haunt us.
• This is a typical example of how the risks of accepting immigrants manifest themselves in this way.
• If you work as a lawyer in Japan, you should put Japan's national interests first.
• What the trial should protect is Japan's laws and the safety of its people, and it is problematic for it to act on behalf of a specific community.
• If this trend continues, it is entirely possible that Japan's judiciary system will be taken over in the future.
• Trials should be fair regardless of nationality, but it is far too dangerous to give preferential treatment to those in a particular position.
• We need to thoroughly investigate why Korean universities have such a high bar exam pass rate.
• If immigrants begin to think only of their own interests, it will only be a matter of time before the country's order falls apart.
• We need to consider whether it is really a safe situation for people from an enemy country to be dealing with Japanese law.
• I am afraid that the more lawyers there are, the more likely it is that a trend of only thinking about the interests of fellow lawyers will spread.
• I believe that only people who have a solid understanding of Japanese law and can consider the interests of the country as a whole should be involved in the judiciary.
• With the judicial system lacking fairness moving forward, I can only see a future in which Japanese people will end up losing out.
• If a 100% pass rate for Korean universities becomes the norm, won't Japanese people have fewer opportunities to pass the bar exam?
• Immigration issues have become social problems in every country, so Japan should feel a greater sense of crisis.
• If things continue as they are, I am worried that certain forces will expand not only in the judiciary but also in other fields.
• Ultimately, we must avoid Japanese laws being bent and Japanese people being put at a disadvantage.

Editor A's opinion

The news that graduates from Korea University have achieved a 2% pass rate in the Japanese bar exam for two consecutive years, with 100 students having passed in the past, raises many thoughts. There is no doubt that this result is the result of the efforts of the test takers and the educational system. However, at the same time, I think we need to be careful about the impact on the Japanese legal profession.

What is particularly worrisome is that the direction they are aiming for is stated to be "compatriotism first." The role of the judiciary is to apply the law impartially and maintain social order, regardless of nationality or position. Nevertheless, the slogan "We want to protect our schools" has been raised, and the attitude of prioritizing the interests of Korean schools and Koreans seems to be a cause for concern for the Japanese legal profession.

Living in Japan, the basic premise is that one must adhere to a fair judicial system that follows Japanese law. Despite this, the spread of thinking that prioritizes the interests of certain ethnic groups or organizations calls into question the neutrality of the judiciary. In Japanese society, passing the bar exam requires a deep understanding of Japanese law and ethics, and the ability to put them into practice. However, when the idea of ​​"compatriotism" comes to the forefront, many people are concerned about whether they will be able to fulfill their duties in an impartial manner.

It is also surprising that the success rate of Korean school graduates is 100%. The bar exam is generally considered to be extremely difficult, and the success rate is not particularly high. Given this, what factors are behind the outstanding success rate of Korean universities? One factor may be the rich educational environment and support system, but there are some aspects that cannot be explained by that alone. It is possible that the uniqueness of the exam preparation and curriculum has an impact, but shouldn't this be examined in more detail from the standpoint of fairness and transparency?

Furthermore, we should keep a close eye on what kind of activities they will carry out in the judicial system. The legal profession is a place that must uphold fairness under the law and must not be biased based on specific interests. If the attitude of prioritizing the interests of specific groups and organizations were to undermine the credibility of the judicial system in the future, it would cause anxiety among the public.

In addition, while the number of people passing the bar exam in Japan is increasing, there are concerns about an oversupply of lawyers and intensifying competition. Under these circumstances, the expansion of influence of certain groups in Japan's legal profession could threaten the fairness based on the values ​​of Japanese society. In order to protect the independence of the judiciary, it will be necessary to ensure transparency regarding the fairness of the exam and the content of the training.

Furthermore, a distinctive feature of the Japanese judicial system is that it places great importance on equality under the law. Whether Japanese or foreign nationality, people should be tried fairly and should not be treated differently based on their ethnicity or origin. Therefore, when graduates of Korea University enter the Japanese legal profession, they are expected to respect Japanese laws and values ​​and provide equal judicial services to all people.

In addition, this issue needs to be discussed by Japanese society as a whole. Rather than simply praising the high pass rate, it is important to calmly assess how the ideology and educational policy behind it are consistent with Japan's legal system.

On the other hand, it is also necessary to keep an eye on what career paths successful applicants from Korea University will choose and what activities they will pursue. If they comply with Japanese law and contribute to the justice system in an impartial manner, this may be something to be welcomed. However, if they are biased toward the interests of certain groups or communities, this will have a negative impact on the entire Japanese justice system.

The judiciary is an important institution that supports the foundation of the nation, and maintaining its neutrality and credibility is of utmost importance. That is why I strongly believe that what is required of those who pass the bar exam is an unbiased perspective that goes beyond any particular interest.

Written by: Editorial Department A

Recent Posts