Britain | Rhetoric and reality

Speeches in Britain’s Parliament are getting shorter—and worse

The problem lies not merely with speaking but with listening

Photograph: Getty Images
|Westminster

The problem is the Post-its. Many criticisms have been made of prime minister’s questions (pmqs). It has been called “boorish”, “childish” and “rude”. Sir Tony Blair thought it “unforgiving”; David Cameron called it “Punch and Judy politics”. It can be cruel: it was at PMQs that Boris Johnson called Sir Keir Starmer “a pointless human bollard” and “Captain Crasheroony Snoozefest”. It can cause shock—and awe. “I count my blessings”, George H.W. Bush said, that “I don’t have to go into that pit.”

Explore more

The Economist today

Handpicked stories, in your inbox

A daily newsletter with the best of our journalism

More from Britain

Many Britons are waiting 12 hours at A&E

The crisis in emergency care has deep roots

Is British justice too secretive?

Controversy rages over what happened both before and after a horrendous mass stabbing



The rise of the Net-Zero Dad

Middle-aged men care less about the problem. But they love the solution