Contraception

Available online 23 January 2025, 110830
Contraception

Review Article
Development of a transdermal gel for reversible male contraception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110830Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

While there are several easy-to-use reversible female contraceptives, little is available for men. Introduction of novel, cost-effective male contraceptives could have important downstream global health and economic benefits. Currently, nearly half of all pregnancies globally are unintended, with many resulting in unsafe abortions, a significant burden for women and families in many countries.
Available reversible options for male contraception include male condoms or withdrawal, both with high typical use failure rates, and vasectomy which is not easily reversible. Advanced methods of male hormonal contraception include combinations of progestin and androgen, generally testosterone itself. Administration of these steroids results in suppression of gonadotropins leading to the suppression of sperm production with full reversibility within a few months. Importantly, the exogenous androgen replaces the suppressed endogenous testosterone, minimizing side effects for the user. Using the skin to deliver steroids in the systemic circulation is a well-accepted concept both for treatment of hypogonadism and contraception. A transdermal gel delivering Nestorone® (segesterone acetate) and testosterone is under development and is leading the way in advancing novel, self-delivered methods of male hormonal contraception.

Introduction

The global unintended pregnancy rate is about 50% of all pregnancies worldwide, and it is even higher among adolescents in the United States [1], [2]. At present, the responsibility of preventing unintended pregnancies falls almost entirely on women. Contraceptive choices for men are limited and lacking, with condoms and withdrawal that have high failure rates, and vasectomy, meant to be a permanent method and not reliably reversible. Having such limited options prevents men from having sufficient contraceptive options to support their own reproductive health needs, while also preventing them from taking a more active role in contraceptive responsibility within relationships.
Even though there is a glaring unmet need for more methods of male contraception, support and funding for research and development has been limited. Most funding for the development of male contraceptives has come from not-for-profit or government organizations conducting research in male contraception and this field has struggled with limited funding over the past decades. The lack of involvement from industry, until recently, may be related to questions that men may not be willing to use a male method, will their partners trust them, who would provide men with the method, and will new methods compete with existing female methods? However, a large survey intended to measure consumer demand for novel male contraceptives and identify product attributes associated with men's preferences, showed that 61% of men had interest in trying novel male contraceptives in their first year of availability, ranging from 39% and 49% (pre- and post-the landmark Dobbs v Jackson Supreme Court decision reversing nation-wide protection of abortion) in the United States to 76% in Nigeria and Bangladesh [3]. Their female partners' interest and trust in male contraceptive use was also very high across all regions. This survey reveals strong demand for novel male contraceptives from developing regions compared to the United States, highlighting the potential market for novel male methods to meet unmet needs, and female partners' trust in men to use them. Men across all countries prefer less invasive forms of contraceptive administration and the transdermal gel was rated among the first preferences in most countries where the survey was conducted. A Liqui-Patch® formulation was also rated favorably, whereas long-acting injectables or implants were not favored by men from medium to low-income countries.
Reversible male hormonal contraception has been undergoing clinical evaluation for around 50 years [4]. Various injections and implants have been tested by over 2,000 couples worldwide, with all studies demonstrating reversibility [5] and around 95% effectiveness in preventing pregnancy when men reach appropriate sperm thresholds (below one million sperm/ml) [6], [7]. These rates are comparable to the typical use rates for the female pill and are better than condoms.

Section snippets

Mechanism of Action of male hormonal contraception

Male Hormonal Contraception (MHC) is based on the use of exogenously administered androgen alone or together with an antigonadotropic agent such as a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog or, most commonly, a progestin, to suppress secretion or action of GnRH in the hypothalamus and decrease the pituitary production of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH).
The progestin ensures the suppression of the gonadotropins which in turn suppresses endogenous testosterone

Transdermal Gel development

The concept of transdermal delivery for steroid application is largely accepted for hormonal replacement therapy in men and women as well as for female contraception. It has been widely recognized that the stratum corneum has the principal barrier function of the epidermis and acts as a reservoir and a diffusion barrier [20]. Among the key factors for skin penetration, the physico-chemical properties of the drug and the characteristics of the enhancers are crucial to determining the rate at

Clinical studies

At present, five clinical studies of NES/T transdermal gel have been conducted by the NICHD-sponsored Contraceptive Clinical Trials Network for male contraception (CCTN) [12], [13], [29], [32], [33].
In a first proof-of-concept study exploring the effect of T gel applied to the shoulders and increasing doses of NES gel (0, 2, 4, 6, 8mg) applied to the abdomen, gonadotropin suppression was assessed in 140 healthy men over a three-week treatment period. NES gel 8mg plus T gel 100mg suppressed both

Regulatory Challenges for the approval of a transdermal male contraceptive gel

Hormonal contraceptive products for women have long been developed, resulting in extensive pharmacological and clinical experience and in the publication of detailed guidelines for female contraceptive development by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [42], [43]. Regulatory guidance for male contraceptive development remains lacking and in the absence of such guidance, those for female contraceptives may be adapted for male products. While some

Conclusions

Consensus recommendations from the research community suggest metrics for evaluating novel male hormonal contraceptives and establishing effectiveness and safety levels, but whether these will be adopted by regulators is unknown [15], [44]. Greater advocacy is needed to push the field forward and convince funders and the pharmaceutical industry that there is a demand for this technology [46]. The development of male contraceptives will not replace female contraceptives and an array of choices

Funding

no funding was used to prepare this manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Blithe Diana L: Writing – review & editing. Sitruk-Ware Regine: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Wang Christina: Writing – review & editing. Page Stephanie T: Writing – review & editing.

REFERENCES (46)

  • Y. Lue et al.

    Male contraception development: monitoring effective spermatogenesis suppression utilizing a user-controlled sperm concentration test compared with standard semen analysis

    Fertil Steril

    (2023)
  • L.M. Rossen et al.

    US Trends in Maternal Mortality by Racial and Ethnic Group

    JAMA

    (2023)
  • J. Kaur et al.

    Assessment of demand for male contraceptives: A multi-country study

    Andrology

    (2024)
  • E. Nieschlag et al.

    Why we need more methods for male contraception

    Andrology

    (2023)
  • P.Y. Liu et al.

    Determinants of the rate and extent of spermatogenic suppression during hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2008)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Hormonal male contraception

    Andrology

    (2024)
  • P. Aaltonen et al.

    10th Summit Meeting consensus: recommendations for regulatory approval for hormonal male contraception

    J Androl

    (2007)
  • R.I. McLachlan et al.

    Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis in primates and man: insights for development of the male hormonal contraceptive

    J Androl

    (2002)
  • A.D. Coviello et al.

    Intratesticular testosterone concentrations comparable with serum levels are not sufficient to maintain normal sperm production in men receiving a hormonal contraceptive regimen

    J Androl

    (2004)
  • N. Ilani et al.

    A New Combination of Testosterone and Nestorone Transdermal Gels for Male Hormonal Contraception

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2012)
  • M.Y. Roth et al.

    Characteristics associated with suppression of spermatogenesis in a male hormonal contraceptive trial using testosterone and Nestorone(®) gels

    Andrology

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text