Leaders | Mission unaccomplished

The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision

A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it

Photograph: Reuters

Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor of the exchequer, will never have a better moment to make bold changes than the budget she presented on October 30th. She had a mandate to fix public services, a huge parliamentary majority and four months to work out how to raise taxes and encourage growth. In the end, she offered an odd mix of eye-popping numbers and small-bore thinking. She has taken steps to fix Britain’s crumbling public services, chronic underinvestment and fairy-tale fiscal forecasts. But she has lost her best chance at reform.

Explore more

The Economist today

Handpicked stories, in your inbox

A daily newsletter with the best of our journalism

More from Leaders

How to improve clinical trials

Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights

Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation

Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world


Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy

A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head


Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth

The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom

Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted

The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe