Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation

Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism with $15 per month
Support us
Support us
Quadrant’s literary editor and poet Les Murray. The magazine’s editor, Keith Windschuttle, has berated the Australia Council for funding rival literary magazines the Australian Book Review, the Griffith Review and Overland while ending the funding of Quadrant. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP
Quadrant’s literary editor and poet Les Murray. The magazine’s editor, Keith Windschuttle, has berated the Australia Council for funding rival literary magazines the Australian Book Review, the Griffith Review and Overland while ending the funding of Quadrant. Photograph: Alan Porritt/AAP

Quadrant calls Australia Council funding loss a leftist 'act of revenge'

This article is more than 8 years old

Editor-in-chief Keith Windschuttle says council made a ‘political decision’ not to award grant because it wanted to ‘devalue our reputation and demonstrate that the left remains in control of the arts’

The Conservative magazine Quadrant has called the loss of its Australia Council funding an “act of revenge” from an arts bureaucracy controlled by the left.

“The Australia Council’s decision to end our funding is plainly an act of revenge by its bureaucrats and advisers,”

editor-in-chief

Keith Windschuttle wrote in an editorial.

“It is designed to punish us for being on the same side of the political fence as the Abbott government’s Minister for the Arts, George Brandis, who himself was responding to an act of arts-funding bastardry by Julia Gillard.

“Throughout the 11 years of the Howard government, its appointees to the Council never reduced the funding of any of the overtly left-wing literary magazines.”

Windschuttle, a conservative historian, said the Australia Council had made a “political decision” not to award a $60,000 grant to Quadrant because it wanted to “devalue our reputation and demonstrate that the Left remains in control of the arts”.

Last week it was revealed that another literary magazine, Meanjin, might be forced to shut down after its funding was also cut by the council.

Windschuttle acknowledged that Meanjin had also lost its funding but blamed its problems on a “succession of editors” and berated the council for funding rival literary magazines the Australian Book Review, the Griffith Review and Overland.

“They are little more than production lines for the Left’s limitless appetite for identity group politics of gender, race and sexual preference, and its support for any national culture, no matter how violent or barbaric, except our own,” Windschuttle wrote.

“In contrast, since its founding in 1956, Quadrant has consistently defended high culture, freedom of speech, liberal democracy and the Western Judeo-Christian tradition.

“Although the Australia Council itself suffered a loss of government funds in 2015, the Quadrant decision was not taken because of a lack of money for literature. Indeed, while abolishing our grant, the council increased its funding to other literary magazines, all of them left-wing.

Windschuttle claimed only Quadrant was serious about publishing literature, and poetry in particular, and had more subscribers than any other literary magazine.

“Quadrant is also the most prolific publisher of poetry in Australia, in either magazine or book format, with up to 300 poems published per year for the past decade.

“Our Literary Editor, Les Murray, has worked on every edition since 1990, that is, for 256 of the magazine’s 518 editions. He is not only widely recognized as Australia’s greatest living poet but also Australia’s foremost poetry anthologist.”

A spokeswoman for the Australia Council said Meanjin, which was considered a leftwing journal, was also unsuccessful in receiving four-year funding.

“All out arts grants are assessed by a panel of artistic peers and it’s a competitive process. We can’t fund everyone,” she said.

The Australia Council gave $112m to 128 small to medium arts organisations in this funding round, announced on Friday.

Related stories

Related stories

  • Artist seeks emails in court after Australia Council pulled funding for self-insemination show

  • Q+A host Virginia Trioli rebukes arts minister over ABC funding cuts

  • Q&A recap: business council calls for legislated target of net zero emissions by 2050

  • Ita Buttrose calls for more funding for greater ABC role in Asia-Pacific

  • ABC calls for new funding model to overcome 'threat' of political interference

  • Australian cultural institutions struggle to survive as War Memorial gets half-billion dollar upgrade

  • Australia to target Google and Yahoo under internet piracy crackdown

  • Arts funding: Labor vows to scrap 'ministerial slush fund'

More from Headlines

More from Headlines

  • Israel-Gaza war live
    Netanyahu’s office talks down reports that Hamas has agreed ceasefire and hostage deal

  • South Korea
    Yoon Suk Yeol arrested after police cut wire fences to break into compound

  • California
    Big oil pushed to kill bill that would have made them pay for wildfire disasters

  • Europe
    Europe must take responsibility for its own security, says Polish minister

  • US politics
    Trump’s attorney general pick to face scrutiny on first day of Senate hearing

  • Donald Trump
    Trump trying to rewrite history in battle to bury Smith report, legal experts say

  • Baftas
    Conclave blessed with 12 Bafta nominations as Nicole Kidman and Denzel Washington shut out

  • Germany
    German economy shrinks for second year in a row

  • Meta
    Meta to fire thousands of staff as Zuckerberg warns of ‘intense year’

  • Australia
    Greater Sydney council bans ‘revealing swimwear’ sparking debate about double standards

Comments (128)

This discussion is now closed for comments but you can still sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion next time

Comments (128)

This discussion is now closed for comments but you can still sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion next time
Sort by
Per page
Display threads
Displaying threads 1 to 25 of 60
  • cloudlander
    1

    A mud bubble flops open from the art glut to add extra stink to the petrol lake to waft around the cheese mountain that won't all go through the intellectual property sieve. Burp and bring the irresponsible minister's head on a plate to place upon yon sideboard next to prize nutcrackers in the empty bowl where bits of broken shell and other less identifiable scraps lie around, still haven't been cleaned up - make note - and take another swipe at the little screen. The frame that hangs the picture perfect scene ignored other than to be beside the door to the outside and some fresh still hanging air waiting for the day to begin again. It's them, their fault and I'm telling on you two too hardy ha ha. Here we go again promises promises. I remember some fool who had to resign a la Sidere mens eadem mutato to go rue at leisure and wonder who else would care when it's too exquisitely obscure to comprehend.

  • 1placebo
    4

    In contrast [to rival publications], since its founding in 1956, Quadrant has consistently defended high culture...Windschuttle claimed [that] only Quadrant was serious about publishing literature, and poetry in particular.

    Samples of literary excellence and serious 'high culture' publishing are available in this piece, The Guardian of the Inane.

    Let's start with a fart joke:

    Like an elevator formerly occupied by a passenger afflicted with terminal flatulence, a visit to The Guardian Australia website serves as a sharp reminder that noxious emanations linger noisomely in small, tight, closed-off spaces.

    Then move on to Australian taxpayer dollars being used to discredit a news outlet:

    Beyond garden-variety hypocrisy there is The Guardian’s entire raison d’etre, which is two-pronged and seriously bent in each tine. The first of those is a rich man’s ego, that of internet entrepreneur and political dabbler Graeme Wood, whose ambition and avocation it has long been to underwrite a pulpit for preachers of the green faith. He tried with the comically inept Global Mail and threw away a pot of money. Then came his decision to underwrite The Guardian’s local incarnation, which must be costing a further packet. Good on him, if that’s his hobby and pleasure...

    Whilst not mentioning Rupert Murdoch:

    Alas that Australia’s well-heeled conservatives do not likewise place deep pockets at the service of their principles.

    And finish in a serve at the likewise taxpayer-funded ABC:

    Being an internet operation, Guardian Australia lacks even the scrap value of ink-soiled forest products, which can be useful for wrapping fish and soaking up puppy puddles. All it can offer, other than accidental amusement, is a sanctuary for those who had not the wisdom to wed an ABCer, thereby opening the inside track to tax-payer funded salaries.

    Not poetry. Poetic justice that you lost funding for your crass political attacks.

Most viewed

Most viewed