Toxic Femininity A harmless approach attempt can be seen as "harassment" nowadays.

[Klaus Kanga II]

At this point, it is almost impossible to approach females in public without the risk of NPC pedestrians seeing it as "harrassment", or her crying "he is sexually harrassing me!", and NPC simps calling the police. What used to be considered a harmless approach attempt 20 years ago can now be seen as "harrassment".

How else are men supposed to find girlfriends? Wait for one to magically knock on their door and saying "hey, wanna be with me"? Maybe in imaginationland. Any possible way to get a girlfriend is being criminalized or at least culturally discouraged. This is something that even discourages decent-looking men from making contact with women.

Another piece of advise giving to men who seek a girlfriend is "initiate a conversation by asking her for directions!", to which a woman can answer "Why didn't you ask that 61-year-old man over there? Why me, who just-so happens to be a 21-year-young woman? He must surely know better!"

Maybe, just maybe, because the man wants to get out of celibacy?

---

Anti-masculine propaganda​

The mainstream media and big corporations like Gilette have also spent years spreading anti-masculine propaganda. The media reports about the one rapist, not the million non-rapists. Similarly, the news report on the one flight that crashed, like Germanwings Flight 9525, which was all over the news for months. But what about the hundred thousand flights that landed safely? [deafening silence]

Men have been perpetually slandered as "toxic" and "privileged" and "harassers" and "rapists". This has changed the culture so that any man can now be seen as a potential rapist.


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rYGU8BHTAXE4

The Demoralisation of Boys and Men - documentary - BEUTTO

If women want no "toxic" men, they can easily accomplish this by not mating with toxic men like they have done since the stone ages! Remember, women are the gatekeepers to ,mating, so it is their responsibility. But as we all know, what a woman says isn't necessarily what she thinks.

Here is the Gilette commercial from 2019, where the "good" man stops the "bad" man from harmlessly approaching a woman. The "good" man (the redditor) says "not cool man" at 1 minute into the video.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkRxdtmJ4L4

Gillette - We Believe The Best Men Can Be (P&G, 2019)

How else is that dude supposed to get a girlfriend?! Waiting for a woman to magically knock on his door?

I wonder how men got together with women a thousand years ago. Didn't they just pick them up and start a happy life together? But no, that is illegal nowadays.

---

The definition is expanding.​

The definition of what is culturally considered "sexual harassment" and "sexual abuse" is expanding. Eventually, men will be considered "sexual abusers" by default, by just existing.

How Feminists Will Cage All Men​

Let's take a look at how feminists can achieve caging all men through shortcut thinking and slowly shifting the meaning of the term sexual abuse.

In 1990 the definition of sexual abuse against a woman might have been something like "PHYSICAL sexual actions against her will, for example touching her genitals, breasts, kissing her and so on". Here feminists start a campaign and force everyone to state they're against sexual abuse, and indeed, most people do because indeed it's not good to physically sexually bully someone, there is little reason for anyone to disagree. Here they establish a shortcut "sexual abuse = bad", which at this stage is not harmful yet. However they slowly start changing the definition of sexual abuse.

By 2000 the new definition of sexual abuse may additionally also include VERBAL actions, such as asking a girl about her sexual life. Here we'll already starting to limit free speech but most people didn't notice the subtle change in the definition of sexual abuse, they just remember they're against sexual abuse.

By 2010 the definition of sexual abuse will also include ANY PHYSICAL action such as any touching at all -- if you touch a woman's hand against her will, you're committing sexual abuse. But most people still only remember they're against sexual abuse, whatever it means -- additionally the few people that notice and criticize the changes in definition start to be bullied for supporting sexual abuse or are told to shut up and not make big deal of a small change in definitions. The changes happen slowly so that at no point people notice a sudden jump which they could protest -- individuals may protest on occasion but one man can do nothing and there will happen no sudden change that would synchronize a mass protest.

By 2020 sexual abuse will include practically any action towards a woman which the woman dislikes in any way, such as making eye contact, talking, smiling, holding door open for her, sending her a friend request on social media sites and so on. Now men are bullied, they're scared of just meeting a woman and talking to her -- if the woman decides it's sexual abuse, it is. But if you ask anyone "Are you against sexual abuse?" of course he has to answer "yes" -- answering "no" is absurd because everyone is against sexual abuse, no matter that definition now is completely different from the original definition, it's just the power of words that can keep people approve of and support insanity.

Soon enough it will be observed that practically all men are sexual abusers because sexual abuse now means just interacting with women and basically all men want to or even just have to interact with women in some way. Now feminists may say: since gender studies proved all men are sexually dangerous, it is "logical" that we have to cage all men, it would be insane to let predators run free, right? And just like that we arrive at our dystopia.

If you think they can't do it, you are wrong.

(source - CC0 public domain)

[I hereby release this post into the public domain, as described in CC0 1.0. This means: feel free to copypasta it wherever you like! You don't even have to credit me.]

 

[PolskiKartofel]

True, we can't even talk to women because all negative scenarios are possible