Title
Colinares vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 182748
Decision Date
Dec 13, 2011
Arnel Colinares is guilty of attempted homicide rather than frustrated homicide, having failed to prove self-defense, with eligibility for probation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 182748)

Facts:

  • Arnel Colinares was charged with frustrated homicide in the RTC of San Jose, Camarines Sur, in Criminal Case T-2213.
  • The incident occurred on June 25, 2000, when Rufino P. Buena and Jesus Paulite went out to buy cigarettes.
  • Jesus paused to urinate by the roadside while Rufino waited nearby.
  • Arnel appeared and struck Rufino twice on the head with a large stone, rendering him unconscious.
  • Ananias Jallores, a passerby, tried to assist but was also struck by Arnel.
  • Paciano Alano witnessed the incident and sought help to bring Rufino to the hospital.
  • Dr. Albert Belleza treated Rufino and testified that the injuries were serious but not fatal.
  • Arnel claimed self-defense, alleging that Rufino and his drunk companions attacked him first.
  • The RTC found Arnel guilty of frustrated homicide and sentenced him to 2 years and 4 months to 6 years and 1 day imprisonment.
  • Arnel appealed to the CA, which upheld the RTC's decision but removed the award for lost income.
  • Arnel petitioned the Supreme Court for review.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court ruled that Arnel did not act in self-defense.
  2. The Court found Arnel guilty of attempted homicide, not frustrated homicide.
  3. The Court allowed Ar...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Self-Defense:

    • Arnel did not prove unlawful aggression, essential for self-defense.
    • His testimony lacked corroboration, and no medical evidence supported his injury claims.
    • Prosecution witnesses gave a more credible account, showing Arnel as the aggressor.
  2. Frustrated vs. Attempted Homicide:

    • The wounds inflicted by Arnel were serious but not fatal.
    • Frustrated homicide requires proof of intent to kill, shown through the nature, location, and severity of wounds.
    • Medical evidence indicated Rufino's wounds were not fatal, leading to a conviction for attempted ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.

Case Digest: G.R. No. 182748 - Colinares vs. People