This transformation may be limited to how one thinks about a specific troubling condition の箇所が分かりづらいです。もう少し推敲して。
別の訳し方はありますか。何種類か、役の代替案を示してください。
「特化する」が一番分かりやすいですね。
和訳して／Box 3.1 THE NAME MIRRORS THE FRAME
The term homosexual originated among nineteenth-century sexologists who sought to make sexual behavior a topic for scientific research; they also spoke of sexual inversion. Both terms seemed clinical to the people they described. Some early activists described
theirs as a homophile movement, favoring that term because it emphasized love rather than sex.
However, a new set of activists emerged in the 1970s, and they favored gay. The gay liberation movement encompassed both males and females, but women complained that their concerns were treated as less important, and demanded equal billing, so it began
common to speak of gay and lesbian issues. Over time, other sexual identities made analogous calls for mention so that the inclusion of bisexuals led to the abbreviation GLB, and adding references to transsexuals (later transgender) produced LGBT. Some expand this to LGBTQ to encompass either queer (suggesting a more radical, edgy orientation) or questioning (for those who are exploring their sexual identities). Others call for adding an / to acknowledge intersex (people with ambiguous reproductive or sexual anatomy).
We tend to take the categories and names that we use to classify people and problems for granted. But all of these terms have histories, sometimes contentious histories in which claimsmakers struggle to get a particular term accepted. In this example, individuals with a variety of identities campaigned to gain recognition as part of a larger gender-nonconforming social movement.
：Source: Wilcox, 2014.
単なる和訳です。和訳しか求めていません。機械的に行ってください。
Box 3.1 THE NAME MIRRORS THE FRAME
The term homosexual originated among nineteenth-century sexologists who sought to make sexual behavior a topic for scientific research; they also spoke of sexual inversion. Both terms seemed clinical to the people they described. Some early activists described
theirs as a homophile movement, favoring that term because it emphasized love rather than sex.
However, a new set of activists emerged in the 1970s, and they favored gay. The gay liberation movement encompassed both males and females, but women complained that their concerns were treated as less important, and demanded equal billing, so it began
common to speak of gay and lesbian issues. Over time, other sexual identities made analogous calls for mention so that the inclusion of bisexuals led to the abbreviation GLB, and adding references to transsexuals (later transgender) produced LGBT. Some expand this to LGBTQ to encompass either queer (suggesting a more radical, edgy orientation) or questioning (for those who are exploring their sexual identities). Others call for adding an / to acknowledge intersex (people with ambiguous reproductive or sexual anatomy).
We tend to take the categories and names that we use to classify people and problems for granted. But all of these terms have histories, sometimes contentious histories in which claimsmakers struggle to get a particular term accepted. In this example, individuals with a variety of identities campaigned to gain recognition as part of a larger gender-nonconforming social movement.
：Source: Wilcox, 2014.
では内容を素人にも分かるように解説してください。
以下の内容も、素人にも分かるように出来る範囲内で解説してください。
Box 3.1 THE NAME MIRRORS THE FRAME
The term homosexual originated among nineteenth-century sexologists who sought to make sexual behavior a topic for scientific research; they also spoke of sexual inversion. Both terms seemed clinical to the people they described. Some early activists described
theirs as a homophile movement, favoring that term because it emphasized love rather than sex.
However, a new set of activists emerged in the 1970s, and they favored gay. The gay liberation movement encompassed both males and females, but women complained that their concerns were treated as less important, and demanded equal billing, so it began
common to speak of gay and lesbian issues. Over time, other sexual identities made analogous calls for mention so that the inclusion of bisexuals led to the abbreviation GLB, and adding references to transsexuals (later transgender) produced LGBT. Some expand this to LGBTQ to encompass either queer (suggesting a more radical, edgy orientation) or questioning (for those who are exploring their sexual identities). Others call for adding an / to acknowledge intersex (people with ambiguous reproductive or sexual anatomy).
We tend to take the categories and names that we use to classify people and problems for granted. But all of these terms have histories, sometimes contentious histories in which claimsmakers struggle to get a particular term accepted. In this example, individuals with a variety of identities campaigned to gain recognition as part of a larger gender-nonconforming social movement.
：Source: Wilcox, 2014.
和訳して／ These four forms of frame alignment pose increasingly difficult challenges to activists. Frame bridging is the most straightforward task: claims are made to prospective recruits who are thought to be ideologically predisposed to being sympathetic to the claims.
Frame amplification depends on emphasizing values and beliefs that the activists already share with the audience for their claims, in order to mobilize them to action; and frame extension requires activists to modify their own frame to make it more attractive to potential recruits. Frame transformation presents the greatest challenge: recruits are asked to abandon their familiar view of the world in favor of the activists' frame.