INTERVIEWS

Filmmaking is a Marathon: Robin Swicord on Wakefield

share:

The indie drama Wakefield is based on a 2008 short story by E.L. Doctorow (Ragtime), which itself was a modern update on Nathaniel Hawthorne’s 1837 short story of the same title.

Successful Manhattan attorney Howard Wakefield (Bryan Cranston) arrives home late to his picturesque house. Not wanting to face his wife Diana (Jennifer Garner) or his twin teenage daughters after a long, tiring day, he decides to wait in the attic of his garage until his family goes to bed.

But Wakefield falls asleep, and the next morning he sees from the garage attic window that his wife is concerned about his mysterious disappearance. He continues to remain “missing” while keeping a watchful eye over his family and their reactions as his disappearance becomes increasingly longer.

The question becomes, how far will Wakefield take this charade? As he comes more accustomed to surviving on his own, even he does not know the answer.

Wakefield writer/director Robin Swicord has a long history of adapting literature into films, including writing or co-writing the screenplays for Little Women (1994), The Perez Family (1995), Matilda (1996), Practical Magic (1998), Memoirs of a Geisha (2005), and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008). She also both wrote and directed the 2007 adaptation of Karen Joy Fowler’s bestselling novel The Jane Austen Book Club.

Creative Screenwriting spoke to Swicord about adapting Doctorow’s short story, building on the character in the screenplay, and why emerging screenwriters need to understand that the process of a screenplay becoming a movie is a marathon.

 Robin Swicord on set of Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Robin Swicord on set of Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

What was it about Doctorow’s short story that inspired you to adapt it as a film?

There was a curious thing that happened almost unconsciously as I was reading the story. I didn’t read it thinking, “Should this be a movie?” But as I was reading it, I began to see images that were not given by the story itself. They were like photographic images that floated into my brain.

I thought I was remembering a movie that I had seen, and it took me a little while to realize that it couldn’t have been a movie because the short story was just published. My imagination was engaged by the story as I read it. That’s unusual and does not happen a lot.

I didn’t pursue it immediately, but strangely a friend of mine who is a producer, Elliot Webb, brought me the short story a few years later. He said, “I have these two Doctorow short stories. Would you be interested in either one for a TV series or a film? Is there something here for you?”

I was so excited to see “Wakefield” again. I said, “This is not a TV series. This is a small independent film, and I know how we should do it.”

We began conversations with Doctorow shortly after that.

I had to get my own head right in terms of what the movie would really be. Here in the movie is a guy who is one way in the beginning and different at the end, which is not what happens in the short story. How does he change? What are the things that make him change? I had to really interrogate the story before I ever got up the courage to meet with Doctorow, because I knew he was going to want to know what kind of movie this was going to be.

I met him and we had great conversations. We emailed and talked on the phone, and started the process of getting him to trust that we had all our ducks in a row.

Jennifer Garner as Diana in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Jennifer Garner as Diana in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

The flashbacks depict Wakefield as a character who is insecure about his relationship. For example, he’s worried about his wife changing in front of the window, and he believes she is flirting with other men. Can you talk about that aspect of his character?

There’s something in him that we don’t understand at first. In a way, maybe he feels he’s a little undeserving of the wife that he has.

He wouldn’t express it that way. In fact, in the beginning he thinks of himself as a victim having to put up with all of her flirtations with other people.

But as time goes on in the story, you begin to realize with him that a lot of that is just projection. We begin to understand when he unearths things from his past that he has essentially fallen in love with someone and won her through nefarious means. He has not been truthful with her. That is the core of him being fearful that he will lose her.

I think that he is driven by his fear of loss. It’s almost like he chucked it all before it was taken away from him. to have some sense of control. [Laughs] It’s a curious psychological portrait, and it took me a little while, writing him and thinking through the events of the story from his point of view, to understand that this is not mental illness.

This is a man who is in crisis and the crisis is of his own making. That was something that Doctorow had said to me.

One aspect that gets more focus in the film than in the short story is Wakefield figuring out his survival challenges. Was it challenging to figure out how he would manage?

There was an almost procedural aspect to it. What would I do? How would I survive if I were living in the attic of my garage undetected?

He is a person with certain standards of cleanliness, what he thinks of as good food, and so forth. At the beginning he takes food from the house, brings his favorite book from his bedside to read, and gets batteries for his flashlight. He prepares like a man who is going camping. There’s something about him like he’s staying in a hotel.

That’s different from how he becomes later on when life gets harder, because he adds another obstruction to his life in that he is not going to take anything from the house any more. He views his exile as a rejection of all that.

It’s all of his own making, and it was fun to figure out where he would begin to shift to when we would see him become more feral. What was the point where he would begin to feel his vulnerability? It was a process for me to outline, and then later directing Bryan while going through the script together to note where those signposts were, so we could have that progression and transformation.

Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

One line that struck me was Wakefield saying, “I never left my family; I left myself.” Why does Wakefield consider himself to be a separate entity from his family in this sense?

Because they are separate. Out of a self you can build any number of lives. He is still there for his family. He is keeping a steady vigil over his family. Think whatever you like about him, but he didn’t leave. [Laughs]

He stayed there throughout all that hardship to keep an eye on them. He doesn’t feel from the inside that he actually left them. Like most of us, he doesn’t really know what he’s doing. But he is acting on these impulses and is following through them by baby steps.

If you said, “OK, Howard, you’re going to go up to that attic now and stay up there for the next nine months. You’re going to become feral and all these things are going to happen to you because you have caused them,” he would say, “No thanks, I think I want to go inside.”

But he doesn’t know these things are coming. He takes these incremental baby steps the way we all do. First he thinks he’ll stay up there until his wife goes to bed. Then he oversleeps, so he thinks he’ll wait until she goes to work. And so on, until he realizes, “I can’t bring myself to go in.”

After he has stranded himself by not coming home and he wants to come home, he wonders, “How in the hell do I get back in?”

It’s a process of him staying and not leaving. But something does change – who he understands himself to be. That’s how he comes to a sense of not leaving his family, but instead leaving himself.

Jennifer Garner as Diana and Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Jennifer Garner as Diana and Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

From a writing standpoint, what is the process for you in adapting such a short story into a feature-length screenplay?

With short stories you have to go in much more deeply. You have more fragmentary evidence with which you are building your narrative. Like an actor, you are seeing places where you could create something a little bigger by a small improvisation.

I tried to think of Doctorow’s short story as giving me these very strong road markers, and it was between these markers that there might be some room for exploration.

There were things that I was interested in that were not in the short story. For instance, when I was first writing to Doctorow, one of the things I said in the email was that I saw the film as a meditation on marriage. He said in his reply that wasn’t his intention in the story, but that he didn’t see why it couldn’t be.

With that kind of permission from him to explore what I found in the story, I kept putting myself under the skin in looking at it thematically, and also in terms of potential, in the sense of, “Wouldn’t it be a wonderful scene if…” Some of the inventions came out of what would be purely cinematic and wonderful.

Then there were things in the short story that were just dead lifts, like the confrontation with the gleaners. It was just a matter of how I could make that the most exciting scene, but also funny at the same time. Playing with that involved keeping all the things he had, but approaching it from this kind of Wakefield-ian tone that I had already established in the screenplay.

Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

Another film that was released recently that you have screenplay credit on is The Promise. What was your involvement with that screenplay?

I sold an original story to the company that ended up making that film, but they did not use my screenplay, which was titled Anatolia. I never met or even had a conversation with the director, Terry George. They hired him, and the next thing I heard was that he had written his own screenplay.

There’s some very fragmentary bits of my story that are in there, but he invented the Christian Bale character and changed the other characters. I had a medical student in my screenplay, but he wasn’t at all like the character in The Promise. At the end of the day, because it was an original story I had an irreducible screen credit. I was very happy for Terry George to take first place, because I did strongly feel that it was his movie, not mine.

It’s that odd thing that sometimes happens because of Writers Guild rules. I ended up with screen credit on something that I didn’t have much to do with in the end.

Christian Bale as Chris Myers in The Promise © 2017 Open Road Films / Jose Haro

Christian Bale as Chris Myers in The Promise © 2017 Open Road Films / Jose Haro

You have history with writing screenplays for projects that have taken a very, very, long time to come to fruition – most notably Little Women and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Could share some of your perspective on persistence and patience when it comes to working as a screenwriter in Hollywood?

I think the first thing that emerging writers should understand is that movies usually take a very long time to get made. That’s just the rule of thumb. It is unusual for people to write something and to have it immediately go into production. Because that’s true, you have to begin to build creative stamina in yourself and get your head right.

For me, getting your head right means understanding that the joy of the work is when you are in your room doing the work. That’s filmmaking.

Of course, you have to continue to hope and work towards making it real and getting it to the screen. But you’re not just auditioning for a movie that just has to happen right away. You’re actually here for the long run – it’s a marathon, and you just have to keep pushing forward.

If that’s not in the life skills that you have, and you don’t think you can learn that, you’re going to be unhappy as a screenwriter. It’s essential that you begin to develop the inner structures that allow you to survive the reality of the business that we’re in.

Featured image: Bryan Cranston as Howard in Wakefield. Photo by Gilles Mingasson. Courtesy of IFC Films. An IFC Films release.

[addtoany]

share:

image

Christopher McKittrick has interviewed many top screenwriters for Creative Screenwriting Magzine. His publications include entries on Billy Wilder and Jim Henson in 100 Entertainers Who Changed America (Greenwood). In addition to Creative Screenwriting Magazine, McKittrick writes about film for <a href="http://www.ThoughtCo.com.">ThoughtCo.com</a>


INTERVIEWS

“We wanted to create a really frightening movie!” John Logan on Alien: Covenant

share:

In Prometheus (2012), director Ridley Scott began laying the foundation for the science fiction world depicted in his horror classic Alien (1979). Now Scott’s space epic continues in Alien: Covenant, the second film in the Alien prequel series, co-written by Oscar-nominated screenwriter John Logan.

Alien Covenant takes place between the events of Prometheus and the original Alien film. It follows the crew of the colonial spaceship Covenant, who receive a transmission from a thought-to-be undiscovered planet. But on landing, the crew become stalked by the precursors to the infamous creatures from the Alien movies.

The first screenplay for the film that would become Alien: Covenant was written by Dante Harper. Ridley Scott then brought on Logan to rewrite the script.

John Logan

John Logan

Logan began his career as a playwright while attending Northwestern University in Chicago. His early writing credits included the television movie RKO 281 about the production of Citizen Kane, which was produced by Ridley Scott.

After Logan’s feature film breakthrough, Any Given Sunday (1999), Scott and Logan worked together again when Logan was one of the many writers who worked on the screenplay for Gladiator (2000) – which brought Logan his first Oscar nomination.

Since that time, Logan’s writing credits have included The Last Samurai (2003), The Aviator (2004), Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007), Rango (2011), Hugo (2011), Skyfall (2012), and Spectre (2015). Logan is also the creator of the 2014-2016 television series Penny Dreadful.

Logan’s films are marked by his focus on character, even in big-budget blockbusters like Skyfall. He has worked with some of Hollywood’s most significant filmmakers, and his movies have grossed over $4 billion worldwide, making Logan one of the most successful screenwriters of the twenty-first century.

Creative Screenwriting spoke to Logan about writing a story that bridged the gap between the modern Prometheus and the classic Alien, bringing the fear back to the franchise, the joy of writing scenes featuring two characters played by Michael Fassbender, and what his background as a playwright taught him about writing screenplays.

Amy Seimetz as Faris in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers - TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Amy Seimetz as Faris in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

First, can you talk about how you got involved with Alien: Covenant? You were one of the writers on Gladiator, so you had worked with Ridley Scott before.

Gladiator was such a great experience, and over the years Ridley and I kept trying to find something else to work on. But nothing was quite right.

He was in the midst of doing the sequel to Prometheus, and he asked me how I felt about Alien. And he asked me to come on board because I love the Alien franchise, especially the original movie. There was already a fantastic script by Dante Harper. So  I came in and worked on it for the last year and a half and through production.

You’ve no stranger to franchise films, having written Star Trek and James Bond movies. What’s the biggest challenge with finding something new in a project that is part of a long-running franchise?

You have to be true to those parts of the story or those characters that excite or move you. Every writer will approach a story with a particular viewpoint. If you hand a James Bond novel to Eric Roth you’ll get one screenplay, to Bill Condon you’ll get another, and to me you’ll get a different one. There are different things that speak to an individual writer.

With Alien: Covenant, I just really wanted to write something that had the feel of the original Alien, because seeing that movie was one of the great events of my youth. It was so overpowering in terms of what it communicated to me and its implications, that when I started talking to Ridley about what became Alien: Covenant, I said, “You know, that was a hell of a scary movie.”

I wanted to write a horror movie because the Grand Guignol elements of Alien are so profound. We tried to recapture that with Alien: Covenant, while also trying to pay homage to the deeper implications of Prometheus. In terms of tone, pace, and how we chose to play this particular symphony, we wanted to create a really frightening movie.

Michael Fassbender in Alien: Covenant. Photo Credit: Mark Rogers. - TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Michael Fassbender in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Speaking of the original Alien, Ripley is one of the great movie heroes of all time, and Daniels fills a similar role in Alien: Covenant. What makes Daniels different from Ripley to you?

One of the great things to celebrate about this franchise is that it was promoting female heroes long before it was popular. The Alien franchise has always embraced the idea of strong feminist iconography and heroism. Obviously that was something Prometheus did with Shaw, and that we’re delighted to do with Daniels.

But Daniels is her own unique beast. One of the major differences between Alien: Covenant and all the other movies in the cycle is that the people on this ship are not soldiers or mercenaries – they’re colonists going to found a new world. One of the reasons why I named the ship Covenant is because when the Pilgrims came to America on the Mayflower they signed a covenant – a social pact.

This crew has a very unique bond because it’s made up of couples – romantic couples, married couples, gay couples, straight couples – so already they’re invested in this shared social mission.

Within the first fifteen seconds of her experience in this movie, Daniels loses her husband. So she’s dealing with catastrophic loss from her first moment of the movie. She’s set on a very shaky emotional foundation, and one of the joys for me in developing the character with Ridley and Katherine Waterston was finding the way in which she steps up to her heroism.

Katherine Waterston as Daniels in Alien: Covenant. Photo Credit: Mark Rogers - TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Katherine Waterston as Daniels in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Another pair of characters I want to ask you about are the androids David and Walter. The characters are very similar on the surface, and are even played by the same actor, but have radically different motivations. In your mind, what makes them different?

For me, the selfish joy of writing this movie was writing the David and Walter scenes, because we have two highly interesting characters who have so many connections. It was very exciting to play with the doppelganger myth because it is so prevalent in literature and fiction.

The differences between them are profound. David was Peter Weyland’s first successful android creation, and indeed Alien: Covenant begins with the birth of David. Someday when someone puts all the Alien movies in chronological order, the very first thing you will see is the awakening of David. He was a very well-formed android, and Peter Weyland instilled him with curiosity, creativity, and eccentricities, which are all so aptly demonstrated in Prometheus. We continue that in Alien: Covenant.

What we posit is that David made people uneasy because he was a little too human, and a little too ambitious. We want our slaves to behave like slaves and machines to act like machines. So future iterations of the model were less interesting – they tried to make them less idiosyncratic, with less sense of achievement.

Thus we have Walter, who seems like a scaled-down version of David. David’s great temptation to him is, “Be more than your programming. You could be as exalted as you choose to be. You have the elements of free will and choice.”

That’s the great provocation that David sort of tosses in Walter’s face.

It was fantastically entertaining writing those scenes, and knowing that I was writing both of them for Michael Fassbender made it more delicious for me.

Michael Fassbender in Alien: Covenant. Photo Credit: Mark Rogers. - TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Michael Fassbender in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers. – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

There’s a Victor Frankenstein aspect to the film, and you’ve worked with the Frankenstein characters before in Penny Dreadful.

One of the things that Ridley and I talked about when we started writing this movie was that we wanted it to be the origin story of the Alien monster itself. The great mystery that surrounds that perfect organism is so tantalizing. We thought that to begin to get into that story would be very interesting.

Gradually, the tropes of Victor Frankenstein came into it. What is it to create life? What is your responsibility to that life? What is your sense of satisfaction when that life satisfies you? What is your sense of disappointment when it disappoints you?

Certainly, all the time I spent with Mary Shelley while working on Penny Dreadful was very useful in examining those tropes.

And you also mention Mary Shelley’s husband with his poem “Ozymandias.”

Yes, of course! I take wicked satisfaction that this is the only major Hollywood movie where a plot point actually revolves around who wrote the poem “Ozymandias.” [Laughs]

Percy Bysshe Shelley, by Curran

I met a traveller from an antique land,

Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert…Near them, on the sand,

Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;

And on the pedestal, these words appear:

My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

Percy Bysshe Shelley

Talking about the philosophical issues that make this series so interesting, in the film Oram remarks that he isn’t fully trusted by the other colonists because he trusts faith over science. Can you talk about that aspect of his character?

This picks up on a very strong seed from Prometheus. To me, Prometheus is a deeply philosophical movie asking essential questions: Where do we come from? Who created us? These are also theological and spiritual questions.

Also, I believe that is the great challenge of the original Alien. This is a life form that evolved in some way. It’s a symbiotic life form, but it’s not. It’s sort of a crab monster, but it’s not. It’s neither male nor female, and it’s neither mechanical nor biological. It’s some weird combination of all of these. If you look at the original Alien, to me the big question to ask is, “What is life?”

Prometheus picks up that seed, but in Alien: Covenant we wanted to be much more direct about it and make the spiritual element about religion and believing in God.

It is not too hard to believe that even in the present day, much less the future, a man of faith would be less respected in the world of science. It just gave great motivation for Oram’s character as he moves through the story, and it also puts him in conflict with the ultra-scientific and realistic David, which is what we wanted.

Billy Crudup as Oram in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers - TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Billy Crudup as Oram in Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

You seem to have done a little of everything in film – animated films, like Sinbad and Rango, musicals like Sweeney Todd, Shakespeare with Coriolanus. Is there something you haven’t had the chance to do yet as a screenwriter that you want to do?

To me, it’s always about who you are working with, and if the story is exciting. It’s not so much a question of what I haven’t done, it’s a question of people I would love to work with or areas that I would love to explore as a writer.

Everyone always says that they would like to write a Western, and I wrote Rango, which sort of satisfies the Western bug.

Working on Sweeney Todd excited me about musicals. So I think if I could do anything right now, I’d say I would love to do another screen musical. I’m working on a few stage musicals now, and there’s something so quixotic and so alchemic about the combination of drama, words, and music that I find exciting.

Thank goodness that with movies like La La Land, suddenly people are going to see movie musicals again. If you asked me which I would like to do, all my life I wanted to do a screen version of Stephen Sondheim’s Follies.

Your background is in playwriting. How did that prepare you for a career as a screenwriter?

I think it was elemental to my success as a screenwriter, because being a dramatist teaches you the basics. You have to start with Aristotle’s Poetics, you have to do Shakespeare, Ibsen, Chekov, Pinter, and Sondheim. Once you have a sense of basics of what drama is, you can be a screenwriter.

It’s going the other way that’s difficult. If you just went straight to writing screenplays, you might write a few good screenplays but you’re not going to build a career as a dramatist. You have to care about the film’s dramatic structure, which is character, conflict, setting, and elocution. I think all those things that playwrights have to learn are elements of good screenplays as well.

Otherwise the danger is that you write something that’s facile, or something that’s good enough, but it’s not really solid to the roots as it needs to be. Playwriting gave me the roots and soil of drama.

Jessica Chastain as Virgilia and Vanessa Redgrave as Volumnia in Coriolanus Photo by Larry D. Horricks - © 2011 The Weinstein Company. All rights reserved.

Jessica Chastain as Virgilia and Vanessa Redgrave as Volumnia in Coriolanus.
Photo by Larry D. Horricks – © 2011 The Weinstein Company. All rights reserved.

What is it that inspires you to write?

Great characters. I am in awe of writers who can have people sitting in a diner and talking, and make it fascinating and dramatic. I don’t have that gift. I’m pulled toward very large – some would say operatic or grandiose – characters or expressions. But that’s what I do, that’s what entertains me, and that’s what I find exciting.

I’m always drawn toward the large scope of a character, or an idea that is some way intriguing and beyond my reach. Writing things that I know that are purely from my experience would be uninteresting. I have to aspire toward something pretty magnificent to give my heart to a play, a movie, or a TV series.

In your career you’ve worked with many superstar directors – Oliver Stone, Martin Scorsese, Ridley Scott, Tim Burton, Sam Mendes, and in theater Michael Grandage…Is there any commonality you’ve noticed among them from working as a screenwriter on their films?

They make me up my game. They’re all better tennis players than I am.

What I love about working with great directors, whether it’s on stage or on screen, is how they challenge me and make me a better writer.

When you’re successful and you have a body of work behind you, you get to a point when people don’t challenge you as much as they should. Getting in with people who can say, “Do better,” is a great thing. That’s exactly what I seek.

Alien: Covenant is in theaters today.

Featured image: Alien: Covenant. Credit: Mark Rogers – TM & © 2016 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

[addtoany]

share:

image

Christopher McKittrick has interviewed many top screenwriters for Creative Screenwriting Magzine. His publications include entries on Billy Wilder and Jim Henson in 100 Entertainers Who Changed America (Greenwood). In addition to Creative Screenwriting Magazine, McKittrick writes about film for <a href="http://www.ThoughtCo.com.">ThoughtCo.com</a>


INTERVIEWS

Go For The Throat: Amber Tamblyn on Paint It Black

share:

Whether you know her from House, Joan of Arcadia, The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants or even Django Unchained, actress Amber Tamblyn has likely stolen a scene or two in some of your favorite films and shows.

But Tamblyn has now moved behind the camera to write and direct her first film, Paint It Black. The Los Angeles native fell in love with the story when her friend Amy Poehler (Parks and Rec, Inside Out) recommended the book by Janet Fitch (author of White Oleander).

Paint It Black takes place in the aftermath of a suicide. When Michael (Rhys Wakefield) takes his own life, his punk rock girlfriend (Alia Shawkat) and wealthy alcoholic mother (Janet McTeer) discover they need one another in a twisted way as they try to deal with the loss.

Creative Screenwriting spoke with Tamblyn about poetic language in film, writing about grief, and the importance of asking for advice.

Janet McTeer as Meredith in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

Janet McTeer as Meredith in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

This film is your directorial debut. What made you want to tell this story?

Amber Tamblyn. Photo by Ron Phillips - © 2009 Main Street Film Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Amber Tamblyn. Photo: Ron Phillips © 2009 Main Street Film Company LLC

I read the novel and I was really blown away by author Janet Fitch’s ability to capture the way women feel. It’s so rare that you get to see a movie about the multidimensional aspects of a woman’s grief. Usually, it just shows ladies crying.

I wanted to make a movie that shows how grief affects people. But also how it affects their heart and their brain, not just their language or life experience.

I wanted us to really feel this from a more visceral, animalistic place. The book had a lot of that, and so much of it was about the narrative inside of women’s heads. So I thought if I could make a movie like that, it would be very unique and different.

How important was it to use these two characters, which are so different from one another?

The book is about grief, but it’s also about a class structure and the way people live in Los Angeles—both rich people in Hollywood Hills and the young punks who live on Sunset Boulevard. That’s the reality of Los Angeles, and I was born and raised there so I understand that very well.

In the book, that also played very well with their obsessions and what they need from each other, especially with what Josie’s character needs from Meredith. I think it was important to reflect that in the movie. It wasn’t just about the grief but also about how people live in different class systems.

Alia Shawkat as Josie and Janet McTeer as Meredith in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

Alia Shawkat as Josie and Janet McTeer as Meredith in Paint it Black.
Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

When did you originally read the book, and how long did it take to get this film made as a first-time writer-director?

I read the book in 2006 I believe. Janet Fitch was not originally interested in having her book adapted. As far as she knew, I was just some random actress trying to get the rights to make a movie out of her book, which could be terrifying.

But I was very persistent, and expressed how I wanted to make it, and the poetic vision that I felt like I had, plus I said how I thought the movie would be different. Also I’m a third-generation from Los Angeles, so I expressed to her that I really understood where the characters were coming from. I told her that I understood the underworld of Los Angeles.

So that took about two years, and then we wrote the script. In totality, it’s been about ten years in the making, so I’ve had a lot of time to sit to think about the type of movie I wanted to make, which was something slightly arch and slightly fantastical, within the world of movies like The Hunger or Sunset Boulevard.

I wasn’t interested in making a gritty indie. I wanted something that felt tonally larger-than-life, as emotions can feel.

A lot of directors who shoot in Los Angeles create films that are a love letter to LA. Were there certain aspects of the city you felt like you had to include in the film?

Yes! There’s a shot of a sign called “Happy Foot, Sad Foot,” which has been on Sunset Boulevard since I was a kid, for as long as I can remember.

It’s just this weird, rotating sign of a foot with a happy face on it, and then on the other side it’s a foot with a sad face on it. So when it rotates you see a happy foot and a sad foot. So when we were rolling B roll, I said to Brian Hubbard, my DP, “When we drive by, you have to get happy foot, sad foot.” If you’re from LA or if you’ve lived there, you know about it—it’s been there forever.

Happy Foot Sad Foot sign, LA. Image courtesy of www.awalkerinla.com

Happy Foot Sad Foot sign, LA. Image courtesy of www.awalkerinla.com

You’re also a published poet. I noticed some symbolism in the film, for example with the pool or the piano. Was there any particular object or event that really stood out for you in the book, and how did you include that in the movie?

A great example of putting poetic language in the film would be within the sequence of shots with Alia Shawkat (Josie) lying in bed with Rhys Wakefield (Michael).

You see it in different points in the film when they’re lying together. Once she pulls a leaf out of his hair, and then there’s another time where she’s lying there along and the leaf is on the pillow. There’s a time when they’re kissing and she pulls his mother’s ring out of his mouth, and another time when Michael’s been replaced by Janet.

We did that in a series of takes, and I just called out different ideas. We would hand her a ring and say, “Now kiss him and take this out of his mouth.” Or, “Let’s get Janet McTeer in here and Janet will lay next to Alia.”

I didn’t know where those shots were going to go, but I knew that they could mean something at the end of the day. I think the poetic part of my brain really kicked in and helped support me as a director.

It’s a very stylish film. What were some of your cinematic influences beyond Sunset Boulevard and The Hunger?

I really love the films of Ingmar Bergman (The Seventh Seal, Wild Strawberries). Even though they’re not tonally the same, I think he wrote women in an incredible, complicated way.

He really made complex women the protagonists in his films. I love anyone who has a real specific style, a visual style like a Quentin Tarantino, David Lynch, or Jane Campion (The Piano, Bright Star).

Bibi Andersson as Sara and Victor Sjöström as Dr. Isak Borg in Wild Strawberries © 1957 - Janus Films

Bibi Andersson as Sara and Victor Sjöström as Dr. Isak Borg in Wild Strawberries © 1957 – Janus Films

As an actress both in film and television, you’ve worked with directors such as Quentin Tarantino. What are some of the things you learned on set that you used to direct this film?

Well, this is going to sound so boring, but time management.

I feel like the quicker and tighter I would run a ship on set, the more time there would be not only for the actors to do their part and get extra takes, but also for the crew to do their job, to make sure everything was lit the way they wanted it to be, things like that. That had always been a frustration for me on sets, where I would see people just sort of messing around and wasting time.

I just wanted to make sure we moved swiftly and quickly, so extra time could allow for the actors to have more takes. That stuff really adds up and matters at the end of the day. Those shots that we were able to get would normally be the types of shots you would cut because you had lost or ran out of time. I knew things like that would be important in the editing room, so I made sure there was time for stuff like that.

Rhys Wakefield as Michael in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

Rhys Wakefield as Michael in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

What did you find to be the most difficult step in the writing process?

I don’t think there was anything really difficult, to be honest. I went through the book and I wrote out in a linear order what happened.

I just wrote the book out in a very straight-forward way: “Josie walks out of her house and goes to a funeral. At the funeral, she’s attacked by Meredith. Later, she meets Michael’s Father.”

So I made myself a template of what the book looks like, and then I went through and started to carve stuff away. “What is the real story here? This isn’t a story about a man who kills himself, it’s about the two women. So maybe I need to get rid of the boy in it, even though it’s about his memory.”

There were a lot of drafts of the script, but there wasn’t anything particularly difficult, per se.

What are you working on now?

There are a couple things I’m working, but I haven’t started writing yet. I’ve just started thinking. They’re just sort of seeds. That’s how Paint It Black started. It started as a small seed or idea that I couldn’t get out of my head. That’s also how poems happen.

Alia Shawkat as Josie in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

Alia Shawkat as Josie in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

So you spend a lot of time outlining or carrying the story with you?

Yes, I do. I think about things a lot. I’m slow to the process in that way, but that’s good for me.

It used to be something where I thought something was wrong with me. I had friends who were putting out a book every single year, or doing a movie or TV show every five seconds, and I would go, “Why can’t I do that?”

But I’ve come to realize that I move very slowly, but I move intentionally. There’s nothing about my slowness that’s not intentional. Everything is me thinking and processing and absorbing information, in order to create something that I hope will be profound.

Do you have any advice for writers or new filmmakers?

I feel like people don’t go for the throat quick enough. A great poem starts with a great line, and you have to grab your audience quick. For me, those are the types of movies, or books, or poems, that are the best. Some people love a slow build but I don’t. I like to get in there quick. I like to get to the meat of what needs to be said.

I also think it’s really hard for people to kill their darlings. People get a little too precious with the work that they love, and they don’t consider what the work is that the audience might love.

If I think about anything, I think about that. People need to be able to kill what doesn’t work.

And also ask for advice. With this movie, I did maybe fifteen test screenings. I wasn’t precious with it. Ask for help. Ask for people’s points of view. Ask for opinions from people that aren’t in our business. Ask poets. Ask veterinarians. Ask Hillary Clinton. Ask people and see what they think of the work.

To find tone you have to do that, and sometimes that means killing the thing you love the most. I know I always do that with poems. I send them to other poets. Oftentimes they’ll go, “Cut all of this. I know you think this is great, but it’s not.” And you go, “Damn it. I know you’re right…”

Paint it Black is in theaters from Friday 19th May.

Featured image: Alia Shawkat as Josie in Paint it Black. Image courtesy of Imagination Worldwide. Credit: Brian Rigney Hubbard.

[addtoany]

share:

image
Brock Swinson

Contributing Writer

Freelance writer and author Brock Swinson hosts the podcast and YouTube series, Creative Principles, which features audio interviews from screenwriters, actors, and directors. Swinson has curated the combined advice from 200+ interviews for his debut non-fiction book 'Ink by the Barrel' which provides advice for those seeking a career as a prolific writer.