or
Nature 635, 791-792 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03796-2
Correction 19 November 2024: An earlier version of this story said that Robert Garisto is managing editor of Physical Review Letters. He is now chief editor.
Correction 21 November 2024: An earlier version of this story stated incorrectly that Dias published a breakthrough CSH study in Nature in September 2020. It was October 2020.
Snider, E. et al. Nature 586, 373–377 (2020); retraction 610, 804 (2022).
Dasenbrock-Gammon, N. et al. Nature 615, 244–250 (2023); retraction 624, 460 (2023).
Snider, E. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117003 (2021); retraction 132, 249901 (2024).
Disclosure: The author of this story is related to Robert Garisto, the chief editor of Physical Review Letters. The two have had no contact about this story.
Exclusive: official investigation reveals how superconductivity physicist faked blockbuster results
Superconductivity scandal: the inside story of deception in a rising star’s physics lab
Judge dismisses superconductivity physicist’s lawsuit against university
Nature retracts controversial superconductivity paper by embattled physicist
Why superconductor research is in a ‘golden age’ — despite controversy
