Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
COMINGSOON.net

Evil Lives Here on ID: Who Is Brandi Worley and What Did She Do?

Apoorva Jujjavarapu
3 min read
Brandi Worley
Photo Credits: gorodenkoff | Getty Images
Generate Key Takeaways

Disclaimer: This article contains mentions of murder and assault. Reader discretion is advised.

“She Hid the Knife in a Toybox” is an episode of Evil Lives Here that will be aired on ID on Sunday, March 3, 2024, at 9 p.m. ET. It delves into the fatal stabbing of Tyler and Charlee Worley by their mother Brandi Worley on November 17, 2016, after which Brandi called 911 and confessed to the stabbing of her children and herself. The murder trial was reportedly the first one in Montgomery County in nearly 6 years.

Brandi Worley was a 30-year-old Central Indiana woman and a mother of two when she stabbed and killed her 7-year-old son Tyler and her 3-year-old daughter Charlee in November 2016. She then stabbed herself and called 911 to inform them that she had stabbed her children in their Darlington home. She claimed that her husband Jason Worley was asleep in the basement then and that her mother was already on the way to the house, according to CBS News.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Her husband Jason Worley reportedly filed for divorce a few hours before the murders. Brandi Worley claimed she killed her children to make sure her husband wouldn’t take them away from her. She also stabbed herself in the neck. The children’s autopsies revealed that the cause of death for both of them was stab wounds in the neck, according to AP News. Worley used a combat knife which was found at the crime scene when authorities arrived.

Jason Worley reportedly woke up to the sound of Brandi’s mother screaming. He entered the crime scene to find his children dead. After authorities arrived, Brandi Worley was taken to the IU Health Methodist Hospital where she received treatment for the stab wounds on her neck.

What was Brandi Worley convicted of?

Brandi Worley remained hospitalized for days before she was taken to the Montgomery County Jail to await her trial. She then pleaded guilty to two counts of murder and was sentenced to 120 years in prison. 65 years for one murder and 55 years for another. She confessed to fatally stabbing both her children to keep her husband from taking them away after the separation. She had already been in jail for 476 days after the crime until her sentencing. This caused the court to subtract that from her total sentence, Fox 59 reported.

Initially, in November 2016, Brandi Worley entered a not-guilty plea and was expected to raise it because of insanity. However, in January 2018, she confessed to the crime in court and pleaded guilty while her attorney claimed there was no real explanation for what Brandi had done. The crime occurred around 4 a.m. on November 17, 2016. She was jailed at the Montgomery County Jail in Crawfordsville, Casteel until her sentencing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Meanwhile, Jason Worley reportedly took to social media to express his resentment over not being able to protect his children. He claimed he had found out that Brandi Worley cheated on him multiple times. He reportedly remained in the marriage only for the children, according to the Mirror. Jason was a software engineer and the couple had been married for 8 years before he asked for a divorce only hours before Brandi fatally stabbed their children.

“She Hid the Knife in a Toybox” will be aired on ID on Sunday, March 3, 2024, at 9 p.m. ET.

The post Evil Lives Here on ID: Who Is Brandi Worley and What Did She Do? appeared first on ComingSoon.net - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.

Solve the daily Crossword

The daily Crossword was played 12,580 times last week. Can you solve it faster than others?
CrosswordCrossword
Crossword
Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
CNN Business

Elon Musk publicized the names of government employees he wants to cut. It’s terrifying federal workers

Hadas Gold and Rene Marsh, CNN
6 min read
Enten explains how American’s view tariffs
Enten explains how American’s view tariffs
Scroll back up to restore default view.
Generate Key Takeaways

When President-elect Donald Trump said Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy would recommend major cuts to the federal government in his administration, many public employees knew that their jobs could be on the line.

Now they have a new fear: becoming the personal targets of the world’s richest man – and his legions of followers.

Last week, in the midst of the flurry of his daily missives, Musk reposted two X posts that revealed the names and titles of people holding four relatively obscure climate-related government positions. Each post has been viewed tens of millions of times, and the individuals named have been subjected to a barrage of negative attention. At least one of the four women named has deleted her social media accounts.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Although the information he posted on those government positions is available through public online databases, these posts target otherwise unknown government employees in roles that do not deal directly with the public.

Several current federal employees told CNN they’re afraid their lives will be forever changed – including physically threatened – as Musk makes behind-the-scenes bureaucrats into personal targets. Others told CNN that the threat of being in Musk’s crosshairs might even drive them from their jobs entirely – achieving Musk’s smaller government goals without so much as a proper review.

“These tactics are aimed at sowing terror and fear at federal employees,” said Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 800,000 of the 2.3 million civilian federal employees. “It’s intended to make them fearful that they will become afraid to speak up.”

This isn’t new behavior for Musk, who has often singled out individuals who he claims have made mistakes or stand in his way. One former federal employee, previously targeted by Musk, said she experienced something very similar.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It’s his way of intimidating people to either quit or also send a signal to all the other agencies that ‘you’re next’,” said Mary “Missy” Cummings, an engineering and computer science professor at George Mason University, who drew Musk’s ire because of her criticisms of Tesla when she was at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Going dark after attacks

Last week Musk reposted an account with the handle Fentasyl and the name “Datahazard,” which describes itself as “Unincorporated Think Tank ~~ Focus: Govt Efficiency, Civil Rights, Victim Advocacy.”

One of the posts reads: “I don’t think the US taxpayers should pay for the employment of a ’Director of Climate Diversification (she/her)’ at the US International Development Finance Corporation,” with a partial screengrab of an employee and her location.

Musk, who called himself “super pro climate” in an X post last year, reposted and commented: “So many fake jobs.” The post has received more than 33 million views and a storm of negative comments. Some called the role a “fraud job” and others demanded Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency cut jobs like it. One user commented: “Gravy train is over.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

It appears the woman Musk targeted has since gone dark on social media, shutting down her accounts. The agency, the US International Development Finance Corporation, says it supports investment in climate mitigation, resilience and adaptation in low-income countries experiencing the most devastating effects of climate change. A DFC official said the agency does not comment on individual personnel positions or matters.

Musk also called out the Department of Energy’s chief climate officer in its loan programs office. The office funds fledgling energy technologies in need of early investment and awarded $465 million to Tesla Motors in 2010, helping to position Musk’s electric vehicle company as an EV industry leader. The chief climate officer works across agencies to “reduce barriers and enable clean energy deployment” according to her online bio.

Another woman, who serves as senior advisor on environmental justice and climate change at the Department of Health and Human Services, was another Musk target. HHS focuses on protecting the public health from pollution and other environmental hazards, especially in low-income communities and communities of color that are experiencing a higher share of exposures and impacts. The office first launched at Health and Human Services under the Biden administration in 2022.

A senior adviser to climate at the Department of Housing and Urban Development was also singled out. The original X post said the woman “should not be paid $181,648.00 by the US taxpayer to be the ‘Climate advisor’ at HUD.” Musk reposted with the comment: “But maybe her advice is amazing.” Followed by two laughing emojis.

Advertisement
Advertisement

CNN reached out to all four federal employees who either declined comment or were unable to be reached. CNN also reached out to HHS, DOE and HUD for comment.

X did not respond to an email seeking comment.

The AFGE public union pointed out that as a federal contractor, Musk himself has benefited from government programs, with $750 billion per year spent on federal contractors compared to about $200 billion for the civilian federal workforce. “We are a comparative steal, and we want to help clean it up too,” Kelley said.

Putting people in harm’s way

Musk has done this kind of thing before – and it’s led to real danger for the people named.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Missy Cummings angered Musk when she was appointed a senior advisor at the NHTSA because her research and public comments were critical of Tesla’s driver-assist programs and she had called for regulating the systems.

Musk targeted Cummings on what was then called Twitter, and his legions of fans followed.

In an interview, Cummings said she received a torrent of attacks, including death threats, and had to temporarily relocate before she eventually moved.

Cummings said she already knows of federal employees who “have dedicated their lives to civil service,” already quitting their jobs in anticipation of what’s to come.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“He intended for them, for people just like this, to be intimidated and just go ahead and quit so he didn’t have to fire them. So his plan, to some extent, is working,” she said.

CNN reached out to multiple experts and academics who specialize in cyber harassment, doxing and online abuse. But several declined to comment on the record for fear of themselves becoming Musk’s targets.

“What has happened has an incredible and horrific chilling effect,” one of them said.

Another said they are “not surprised” with Musk’s re-posts, adding they are an example of a “classic pattern” of cyber harassment.

Ramaswamy did not directly respond to questions about singling out individual federal employees but told CNN: “Most federal employees, like most human beings, are fundamentally good people and deserve to be treated with respect, but the real problem is the bureaucracy.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Our opponent is not any particular individual. Our opponent is the bureaucracy,” he added.

In a follow-up post, the Fentasyl account, which itself is anonymous, wrote: “It goes without saying that you should not harass someone solely because they hold a senior government plum job that should probably not exist,” the account posted. “But senior government officials are not mere rank-and-file employees. We deserve to know who is running our government & what they do.”

Cummings, who was also one of the first female fighter pilots in the US Navy, said she felt an obligation to speak out.

“Somebody has got to speak out,” she said. “I’m just not going to let him win on this point.”

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
Popular Mechanics

The Dogs of Chernobyl Are Experiencing Rapid Evolution, Study Suggests

Darren Orf
3 min read
the stray dogs of chernobyl
Are Chernobyl Dogs Experiencing Rapid Evolution?Sean Gallup - Getty Images

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."

  • For decades, scientists have studied animals living in or near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant to see how increased levels of radiation affect their health, growth, and evolution.

  • A study analyzed the DNA of 302 feral dogs living near the power plant, compared the animals to others living 10 miles away, and found remarkable differences.

  • While the study doesn’t prove that radiation is the cause of these differences, the data provides an important first step in analyzing these irradiated populations, and understanding how they compare to dogs living elsewhere.


On April 26, 1986, the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor in northern Ukraine—then part of the Soviet Union—exploded, sending a massive plume of radiation into the sky. Nearly four decades later, the Chernobyl Power Plant and many parts of the surrounding area remain uninhabited—by humans, at least.

Animals of all kinds have thrived in humanity’s absence. Living among radiation-resistant fauna are thousands of feral dogs, many of whom are descendants of pets left behind in the speedy evacuation of the area so many years ago. As the world’s greatest nuclear disaster approaches its 40th anniversary, biologists are now taking a closer look at the animals located inside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), which is about the size of Yosemite National Park, and investigating how decades of radiation exposure may have altered animals’ genomes—and even, possibly, sped up evolution.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Scientists from the University of South Carolina and the National Human Genome Research Institute have begun examining the DNA of 302 feral dogs found in or around the CEZ to better understand how radiation may have altered their genomes. Their results were published in the journal Science Advances.

“Do they have mutations that they’ve acquired that allow them to live and breed successfully in this region?” co-author Elaine Ostrander, a dog genomics expert at the National Human Genome Research Institute, told The New York Times. “What challenges do they face and how have they coped genetically?”

The idea of radiation speeding up natural evolution isn’t a new one. The practice of purposefully irradiating seeds in outer space to induce advantageous mutations, for example, is now a well-worn method for developing crops well-suited for a warming world.

Scientists have been analyzing certain animals living within the CEZ for years, including bacteria, rodents, and even birds. One study back in 2016 found that Eastern tree frogs (Hyla orientalis), which are usually a green color, were more commonly black within the CEZ. The biologists theorize that the frogs experienced a beneficial mutation in melanin—pigments responsible for skin color—that helped dissipate and neutralize some of the surrounding radiation.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This made scientists ponder: could something similar be happening to Chernobyl’s wild dogs?

The study uncovered that the feral dogs living near the Chernobyl Power Plant showed distinct genetic differences from dogs living only some 10 miles away in nearby Chernobyl City. While this may seem to heavily imply that these dogs have undergone some type of rapid mutation or evolution due to radiation exposure, this study is only a first step in proving that hypothesis.

One environmental scientist, speaking with Science News, says that these studies can be tricky business, largely due to the fact that sussing out radiation-induced mutations from other effects, like inbreeding, is incredibly difficult.

However, this study provides a template for further investigation into the effects of radiation on larger mammals, as the DNA of dogs roaming the Chernobyl Power Plant and nearby Chernobyl City can be compared to dogs living in non-irradiated areas. Despite a current lack of firm conclusions, the study has shown once again that an area that—by all rights—should be a wasteland has become an unparalleled scientific opportunity to understand radiation and its impact on natural evolution.

Advertisement
Advertisement

📧 To always be in the know, sign up for our newsletter.

You Might Also Like

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
The New Republic

Mexican President’s Harsh Takedown of Trump Exposes an Ugly MAGA Scam

Greg Sargent
6 min read
Generate Key Takeaways

Donald Trump’s angry threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on all U.S. imports from Mexico—delivered Monday via the cautious diplomatic language of a Truth Social rant—is widely being depicted as a bluff. Trump declared that once in the White House, he will impose the tariffs unless Mexico stops migrants and fentanyl from “pouring” into the United States. Seen as a feint, the tactic could theoretically get Mexico to halt the migrant flow, allowing Trump to pull back on tariffs later while boasting that on the border, he has already bent Mexico to his will.

But amid all this parsing of Trump’s intentions, a crucial fact about his new move is getting lost: At the center of it is a lie. This lie is hiding in plain sight: It’s the underlying suggestion that Mexico is not doing anything to stop migrants from coming and that Trump’s threat of tariffs is needed to change that. Here we’re getting an early glimpse of how he will deceive voters about some of his most potentially destructive designs, on tariffs and immigration alike.

All this is laid bare by the sharp response to Trump’s threat that new Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum issued Tuesday. Her statement is getting attention for its barbed claim that American guns trafficked to Mexico are fueling crime and violence there among gangs supplying U.S. markets with drugs. “Tragically, it is in our country that lives are lost to the violence resulting from meeting the drug demand in yours,” Sheinbaum noted acidly, suggesting that the two countries’ interrelated national challenges underscore the need for cross-border cooperation rather than Trumpian confrontation.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That’s a harsh indictment of Trump’s whole worldview. But this dry bureaucratic bit also deserves note:

You may not be aware that Mexico has developed a comprehensive policy to assist migrants from different parts of the world who cross our territory en route to the southern border of the United States. As a result, and according to data from your country’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP), encounters at the Mexico-United States border have decreased by 75% between December 2023 and November 2024.

What this polite (and euphemistic) language says is that Mexico is already acting extensively to thwart migrants who travel through that country—originating south of Mexico—so they don’t reach our own southern border. As Sheinbaum notes, this is partly why border apprehensions in the United States have dropped sharply of late.

It’s darkly amusing that Sheinbaum would cite U.S. statistics to make this point, because Trump does not allow that the reality depicted by our own data even exists. During the fall campaign, Trump endlessly repeated the lie that our “open” border is getting obliterated by a world-historical invasion, even as apprehensions plummeted and matched levels sometimes seen during Trump’s presidency. The latest numbers show that in November, apprehensions hit a new low under Biden and sank lower than some months under Trump.

Those numbers are relatively low partly thanks to Mexico. Adam Isacson, who tracks migration for the human rights group Washington Office on Latin America, put together a chart using Mexican government data that illustrates the point. It shows that Mexican forces have been apprehending tens of thousands of migrants traveling to the U.S. through Mexico each month (and sometimes over 100,000) up through August, the last month of available data:

As Isacson shows, another big thing keeping illegal border crossings down is Biden’s CBP One app, which allows migrants to make appointments to enter temporarily via various programs in an orderly, lawful manner. (Trump will also end that program, nixing something that’s contributing to reductions in crossings, because his paramount goal isn’t border security, it’s fewer immigrants here.)

Advertisement
Advertisement

The reporting bears out the bigger dynamic. As The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal document, the Mexican government is using elaborate security operations to shuttle migrants heading for the U.S. border back south through Mexico. According to The Post, Mexican officials call this “El Carrousel,” or “the merry-go-round.”

Some experts see Biden’s private diplomacy with Mexico’s previous president as a critical ingredient in making all that happen. This cooperation, plus Biden’s recently imposed restrictions on asylum seeking and the CBP One app program, are all major contributors to this year’s lower apprehension numbers, Isacson says.

“If Trump wants Mexico to crack down on unauthorized migration through its territory,” Isacson told me, “then Biden has already gotten Mexico to do that to a greater extent than anyone has ever done before. He did it without tariffs.”

During the campaign, Trump simply pretended none of that was happening. It’s one of MAGA’s biggest deceptions, and his latest scam carries it forward. The very idea that Mexico must be bullied with tariffs into cracking down on migrants is designed to imply that it’s doing nothing right now—it’s taking advantage of us, Trump might say—and only his fearsome threats can force it into submission.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This massive swindle is getting lost in the coverage. Much of it is focused on the potential consequences of tariffs, such as upending trade throughout the Americas and creating extensive hardship for U.S. industries. That’s understandable, since the damage could be severe, but you can read whole articles about this that don’t inform you that Mexico is already doing much of what Trump wants it to do—or that this was apparently accomplished through diplomacy, without Trumpian bluster.

All this paves the way for larger deceptions later. Bank on it: The moment Trump takes office, the lower apprehension numbers will magically become real metrics. Fox News will start trumpeting them, and Trump will start claiming the border has achieved pacification due to his strength. Indeed, Trump very well may credit his current threat of tariffs with “forcing” Mexico to make the lower numbers of border crossings a reality.

It’s deeply disturbing that Sheinbaum’s statement—which appears partly directed at Americans—represents a far more faithful effort to inform us about the reality of the cross-border situation than anything offered by our own incoming president. It all suggests we may not be prepared for the gale-force agitprop that’s about to hit us.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
The Hill

Musk accuses Trump whistleblower Vindman of ‘treason,’ says ‘he will pay’

Miranda Nazzaro
3 min read
Musk accuses Trump whistleblower Vindman of ‘treason,’ says ‘he will pay’
Generate Key Takeaways

Elon Musk on Wednesday suggested retired Army Lt. Col Alexander Vindman “committed treason” and “will pay” after the former Trump impeachment witness accused the tech billionaire and close Trump ally of being unwittingly used by Russia.

“Vindman is on the payroll of Ukranian oligarchs and has committed treason against the United States,” Musk wrote on his social media platform X, responding to comments Vindman made in an interview about Musk’s reported conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Musk added that Vindman, who played a central role in the first impeachment of then-President Trump, “will pay the appropriate penalty.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Hill has reached out to Vindman’s team for comment.

Musk’s remarks vowing a penalty come as Trump has drawn scrutiny over his repeated pledges to take revenge on his perceived enemies once back in the White House. The former president’s fixation on retribution has sparked concern among critics, some of whom worry a second Trump term will lack some of the guardrails that existed in his first four years in the Oval Office.

The tech billionaire went after Vindman, who worked as a Ukraine expert on the National Security Council and later testified in Trump’s 2019 impeachment hearings, after Vindman pointedly criticized Musk in an MSNBC interview circulated online.

“Clearly Putin has a type. He likes narcissists and egomaniacs that he knows as a case officer can easily pander to manipulate, to do his dirty work,” Vindman said in the late October interview circulated online by X users this week. “Russia has been using different levers — whether that’s corruption networks, in this case, its influencers like Donald Trump, like Elon Musk, to kind of sow discord.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Musk had been in regular contact with Putin since late 2022. Putin and Musk reportedly had various conversations on personal matters, business and geopolitical tensions, while sometimes involving other high-ranking Russian officials, including Putin’s first deputy chief of staff, Sergei Kiriyenko.

Vindman said Musk’s interactions with Putin are “particularly troubling” since the tech entrepreneur has access to state secrets and “Top Secret security clearance.”

“It’s possible that some of that is seeping through,” Vindman said, adding, “He’s [Putin] been using the richest man in the world to do his bidding. In some cases, that’s encouraging him probably to support Donald Trump.”

Musk’s aerospace company, SpaceX, holds contracts with the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community worth billions of dollars, while his electric vehicle company Tesla receives federal subsidies.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The tech entrepreneur has reportedly claimed he holds a U.S. security clearance as part of these federal agreements.

Vindman has remained a vocal critic of Trump, stating earlier this year Trump has “every intention” to undo American democracy if reelected.

This is not the first time Musk and Vindman have clashed on social media. The two got into a social media spat in 2022 when Vindman called Musk a “purveyor of hate and division” in response to the X platform owner labelling him “both puppet & puppeteer.”

Vindman’s twin brother, Eugene Vindman, a retired Army officer, was elected to the U.S. House earlier this month to fill the seat being vacated by Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.).

Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Advertisement
Advertisement
'I can't pay my bills,' Rudy Giuliani says in courtroom outburst
Reuters
Trump team says Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire deal brokered by Biden is actually Trump's win
Associated Press
Man who went missing in 1999 found after sister sees his picture in news article: Sheriff
ABC News
Patrick J. Adams Quit ‘Suits’ Because ‘I Was Drinking Too Much’ and ‘Depressed’: ‘The Only Reason to Stay Was Money’ and ‘I Never Regretted’ Leaving
Variety
Congressman Asks FEMA Head If She’s Controlling Weather, Sending Hurricanes to Trump Voters’ Homes
Futurism
Advertisement