Singapore is deploying more self-driving buses, freight vehicles, and street sweepers.
Autonomous vehicles are a way to address labor shortages and use scarce land more efficiently.
Singapore’s clear guidelines and high consumer acceptance have drawn foreign AV firms.
Singaporean Sharon Ong’s toddler son, like most kids his age, is fascinated by all modes of transportation. On a recent visit to the resort island of Sentosa, mother and son hopped on and off the monorail, a bus, and the beach tram, saving the latest addition for the last: the Robobus.
The self-driving minibus is the first autonomous vehicle accessible to Singapore’s public. Launched in June by China’s WeRide, the brightly colored shuttle takes about 12 minutes to complete a 1.2-kilometer loop with four stops. As required by law, a safety driver sits up front, observing feeds from the vehicle’s radar, lidar, and multiple cameras on four display screens.
“It was very comfortable,” Ong told Rest of World, after riding on the seven-seater one muggy November morning. “Plus I felt safe.”
Autonomous vehicles (AV) are largely synonymous with the U.S. and China, where big tech and automotive firms, including Google, Tesla, General Motors, Baidu, and Pony AI, have invested heavily in driverless vehicles. But far from the Waymos, Cruises, and Apollo Gos, Singapore has slowly been rolling out more AVs to tackle issues ranging from labor shortages to land scarcity, as the vehicles can be deployed only when needed and can park more efficiently, needing fewer parking spaces.
While on-road trials in Singapore began in 2015, the pace has picked up recently, and this year has been particularly eventful. Authorities have greenlit self-driving robot sweepers for street cleaning and AVs to transport goods for FairPrice, the country’s largest supermarket chain. Changi Airport kicked off a two-year trial in July to test autonomous buses to ferry workers, while an all-terrain self-driving vehicle began delivering feed at the bird park.
The AVs will allow the country to automate tasks, such as cleaning, delivering goods, and driving fixed routes, with minimal human supervision, freeing up workers for more complex activities, authorities have said. The country has readily embraced driverless technology primarily because of the promise of greater productivity, Sebastian Yee, director of business development at WeRide in Singapore, told Rest of World.
“The technology has improved and evolved tremendously,” said Yee, whose Guangzhou-based firm also holds driverless permits in China, U.S., and the UAE. “Now people are more open to AVs, and the cost of implementation is also lower. I think this is the right time and right place.”
Worldwide, forecasts for full self-driving cars have consistently missed the mark. But automated features, such as hands-free driving and crash-avoidance systems, are increasingly common, even in mass-produced models, thanks to advances in artificial intelligence, cameras, and radar, and sensor technologies. These features have been touted as making driving safer and easier but have also come under scrutiny after hundreds of crashes, some of which have resulted in fatalities.
Moovita is Singapore’s only homegrown firm to produce a driverless vehicle.Moovita
Singapore has opted to move more cautiously. It is currently trialing more than a dozen AVs on public roads, including a 13-seater bus from homegrown firm Moovita. The bus ferries polytech students between the school and the train station as well as within the campus. Moovita will soon add two more buses and additional stops, Vice President Ken Chan told Rest of World.
After years of seemingly slow progress, “Singapore is actually starting to move quite far ahead” in terms of deployment, he said.
The intent is clear. When the Singapore government unveiled its Smart Nation initiative in 2014, AVs featured in its goal to enhance citizens’ lives with digital technologies. AVs were also seen as key to “transforming land transport” by addressing long-standing problems, including a chronic shortage of bus drivers in the nation of nearly 6 million people.
“Everyone is really concerned about manpower,” Niels de Boer, senior program director at the Centre of Excellence for Testing and Research of Autonomous Vehicles (CETRAN), told Rest of World. Foreign bus drivers help make up the shortfall, but they are “not a long-term solution,” said de Boer, whose center partners with the country’s Land Transport Authority (LTA).
Self-driving vehicles could plug the labor gap: Singapore ranked first among 30 countries, including the U.S. and China, on the Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index from consultancy KPMG, which rated nations on their ability to integrate driverless technology into their transportation systems. The city-state also topped the categories of policy and legislation as well as consumer acceptance.
The Southeast Asian nation has clear guidelines for AV safety, testing, and deployment — unlike the U.S. and China, where legislation tends to vary by city, state, or province. The strong government support, and Singaporeans’ willingness to embrace the new technology, is a draw for foreign AV firms as well. In addition, the “exceptionally high safety requirements make the license highly prestigious,” a spokesperson for WeRide told Rest of World.
“After years of seemingly slow progress, Singapore is actually starting to move quite far ahead”
A Singapore AV license also gives firms a leg up elsewhere. “Singapore has a very good reputation — once we have a public access license, it’s recognized by other customers overseas as well, for example, in the UAE and in Hong Kong,” Terry Zhou, managing director of Chinese firm ZelosTech, told Rest of World. “No matter what achievement we’ve made in China, it’s not duplicable for overseas markets.”
Singapore was Zelos’ first choice when it decided to venture overseas, in large part because of the country’s political neutrality, Zhou said. “When you consider America, it’s not an ideal place for Chinese companies,” he said. Suzhou-based Zelos, which supplied AVs to FairPrice, plans to become a Singapore-registered firm, he said. “That’s our ultimate goal.”
Digital Divinity
A nine-week newsletter series exploring the ways technology is reshaping spirituality and religion.
Meanwhile, Moovita — a spin-off from the Singapore government’s Agency for Science, Technology and Research, and the only homegrown firm to produce a driverless vehicle — has ventured into China. In October, it launched five self-driving buses in Tianjin Eco-City, making it the first foreign AV provider to obtain a license in China, where thousands of AVs are deployed for a wide range of uses, including parcel delivery and ride-hailing taxis, besides busing and street sweeping.
Moovita plans to set up an AV manufacturing hub with a bus maker in Xiamen, Chan said. Its buses, which are operated by a local firm, are capable of navigating even in fog and snow, conditions alien to tropical Singapore, he said.
The fierce local competition was a draw. “China is a proving ground for us — if we can establish ourselves and have our technology proven there, we feel we should be on par with our competitors,” Chan said.
Globally, autonomous ride hailing and freight trucking can be adopted widely and more easily monitored for safety standards than personal AVs, experts say. In Singapore, the focus for now will be to roll out more logistics AVs and self-driving minibuses on “simpler bus routes with lower traffic and ridership,” Minister for Transport Chee Hong Tat said recently.
“We do want to move faster,” he said. “However, it is important to do so safely in our dense urban environment, and to also ensure that the different elements of our ecosystem are
ready.”
Cyber attacks hurt government, academic, and business establishments.
The Philippine Army is recruiting civilians to help stem cyber threats.
Young techies appreciate the opportunity to work for the country, despite lower pay.
Earlier this year, the Philippine Army put out an unusual call on Facebook, inviting civilian hackers to join its cybersecurity unit. “We have a greater enemy that wants to devour us. Do we want to let them?” Joey Fontiveros, founding commander of the Cyber Battalion, said in a Facebook Reel that has been viewed over 2 million times. “Why not join us?”
The Philippines is among the countries most vulnerable to cyber attacks, with tens of thousands of cyber threats targeting its government agencies, academic institutions, and corporations in recent years. Cyber attacks on the email servers and websites of the Philippine Coast Guard and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. this year were traced to China, authorities said. China has denied this.
In response to the threats, the Philippine government has adopted a new five-year national cybersecurity plan, formed a defense network with the U.S. and Japan, and asked the military to reinforce the security of its systems. The Cyber Battalion, which was set up in 2020, was initially staffed by soldiers. The army then decided to actively recruit civilians. It targets young IT professionals who may be open to lower wages for greater job security and the pride of working for the nation, Lieutenant Colonel Ariel Alejandro, the Cyber Battalion’s commander, told Rest of World.
The Cyber Battalion is led by Lieutenant Colonel Ariel Alejandro.
“The cyber practitioners in our military force are very limited. We need a lot more,” Alejandro said. “Our limitation is we cannot afford to offer the same benefits as private and multinational companies. [But] joining the Philippine Army through the Cyber Battalion is a way of helping the country for our young bloods.”
The Cyber Battalion currently has a staff of about 120. The unit has so far hired about 70 civilian experts in their 20s and 30s. Civilian recruits receive months-long training, including the basics of life in the military, such as morning calls, exercise drills, and some weapons training. The viral Facebook Reel, a part of this year’s recruitment drive, drew nearly 5,000 comments and inquiries. Several filed job applications, Alejandro said.
“We will recruit cyber warriors … this new breed of warriors does not have to be muscle strong.”
The job itself is “very taxing, very challenging,” said Fontiveros, who is now commander of the Armed Forces of the Philippines Cyber Group, a unit serving the military headquarters. “You look at your monitor without even the nerve to blink because you are seeing all the traffic that’s there,” he said.
It’s a very different kind of job from those in tech, financial services, telecoms, or insurance that Filipino IT graduates generally flock to. The IT industry employs around 1.5 million workers, according to the IT & Business Process Association of the Philippines. Some 850,000 fresh college graduates enter the industry every year; few are trained in cyber threats.
Worldwide, cybercrime cost companies an estimated $8 trillion in 2023, a number that is expected to triple by 2027. Last year in the Philippines, ransomware group Medusa broke into the systems of state insurer PhilHealth and leaked the personal data, including sensitive information such as government IDs and bank account details, of an estimated 42 million members when the government refused to pay the $300,000 ransom. Private health insurer Maxicare and fast food chain Jollibee have also reported data breaches that affected millions of customers.
Across Southeast Asia, Chinese state-sponsored threat groups have targeted government and private-sector organizations, according to a 2023 report from Microsoft and intelligence firm Recorded Future. These include malware, distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks, data leaks, and compromised websites and reflect Beijing’s geopolitical ambitions in the region, analysts said. Tensions have been running high between Beijing and Manila, in particular, as both states assert their claim over the resource-rich waters of the disputed South China Sea.
Former IT executive Ferdinand Lazarte, 31, has worked with the army for four years.
So “it’s not surprising that when there’s a flare-up in the South China Sea, then you would have a flare-up in cyberspace,” Miguel Gomez, a cybersecurity researcher at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore, told Rest of World. The Philippine military “doesn’t have nearly enough skilled manpower to cover all their bases. That’s a big problem.”
The Chinese embassy in Manila earlier said accusations that it engaged in cyber attacks against the Philippines were “groundless.” China “firmly opposes and cracks down on all forms of cyber attack in accordance with law, allows no country or individual to engage in cyber attack and other illegal activities on Chinese soil or using Chinese infrastructure,” it said.
Simply hiring civilian hackers is not going to solve the cyber threat problem, Sherwin Ona, an associate professor of political science at the De La Salle University in Manila, told Rest of World. The government needs to set a baseline for cybersecurity and regularly conduct audits and risk assessments, he said.
“Cyber readiness initiatives are just now beginning to grow teeth,” Ona said. “However, it’s an uphill climb.”
Still, the efforts appear to be paying off. The Philippines has improved its ranking in the United Nations Global Cybersecurity Index this year. Authorities said the progress can be attributed to the focus on strengthening cybersecurity, building capacity, and collaborating with other countries. But they also noted that the constant brain drain, with IT professionals leaving the country, posed a “big challenge.”
Civilian recruits receive months-long training, including the basics of life in the military, such as morning calls, exercise drills, and some weapons training.
The Armed Forces has set up a new entity called the Cyber Command to improve coordination among the military’s cybersecurity units. Civilians will be a part of this program too. “We will recruit cyber warriors,” General Romeo Brawner, chief of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, told reporters. “This new breed of warriors does not have to be muscle strong.”
The army hopes to recruit more civilians like Ferdinand Lazarte. The 31-year-old IT executive had always wanted to serve his country, like several of his family members who worked in the military and police force, he told Rest of World.
“My first goal was just to contribute, to be able to create a system and say, ‘I made this,’” he said. He began as a penetration tester in 2020, performing simulated cyber attacks to spot vulnerabilities, then became a forensic investigator and instructor at the Cyber Battalion. He also helped create a platform for cyber exercises and a virtual private network for the Philippine Army.
After four years, he has a bigger role than he would have had in a similar job in the private sector, he said, and is eyeing a promotion. “I enjoy the work, and I’ve learned a lot,” he said. “I see the importance of
it.”
Chinese startups supported by Microsoft and Google incubator programs worked with police
Documents reviewed by Rest of World show several companies backed by U.S. tech giants provided policing or censorship tools to Chinese law enforcement.
Joanne Lee/Qilai Shen/Panos Pictures/Redux/Rest of World
Joanne Lee/Qilai Shen/Panos Pictures/Redux/Rest of World
Two of the companies were selling censorship software or working with the police before they joined Microsoft's long-running incubator program.
The vast majority of Chinese participants don't have surveillance applications, and some programs were launched in a friendlier era in U.S.-China relations.
Startups' technology can combat phone scams and find missing children, but software has also played a role in online censorship and surveilling populations.
Silicon Valley tech giants, including Microsoft and Google, have supported tech companies that provide censorship and policing technologies in China, according to publicly available corporate and promotional materials reviewed by Rest of World.
Data Grand
Year incubated:
2017, by Microsoft
Specialty:
Text processing and automation
Key takeaway:
Has provided censorship tools since at least 2017 and provided automation software to Chinese police since at least 2020, according to Data Grand online posts.
Support for the companies through their startup incubator programs raises questions about the future of these initiatives, especially as Donald Trump prepares to take a second term as president. Experts say Chinese tech companies and their Western partners will likely face increasing scrutiny in Washington for the next four years, and the kind of tech collaboration Microsoft once pioneered with China might be facing an end.
Over the last decade, China has become a global leader in using new technologies for surveillance and policing. In some cases, the technology enforces traffic rules and finds missing children. But authorities also use cutting-edge software to censor online speech, arrest bloggers and activists, and surveil ethnic minorities, most notably the Uyghur population in the northwestern region of Xinjiang.
Two Chinese companies were selling censorship software to support government regulations or working with the police before they joined Microsoft’s long-running program. AI startup Data Grand sold censorship software to internet companies before joining the incubator in 2017, while cybersecurity firm Tophant partnered with a police research institute back in 2021, before it was accepted into the program in 2023.
Two other startups partnered with Chinese police after they graduated from the U.S. tech giant’s program. In 2018, facial recognition firm DeepGlint worked closely with police in Xinjiang, where the government deployed surveillance tools to oppress ethnic minorities. In 2021, the U.S. sanctioned DeepGlint for its involvement in human rights violations in Xinjiang. Another company, Hydata, collaborated with a police lab in Xinjiang in charge of analyzing surveillance camera footage.
The incubator program, called “Microsoft for Startups,” has supported more than 800 companies since its launch in China in 2012, according to Microsoft’s website. The program provides office space, mentorship opportunities, access to Microsoft tools and cloud computing and connects firms with investors and clients. Several U.S. tech companies have introduced similar incubator programs in China to find business partners and expand their own client base in a fast-growing tech industry.
The Microsoft accelerator focuses on cutting-edge industries such as AI, cloud computing, virtual reality, and robotics, according to a recent state media interview with James Chou, the managing director of Microsoft for Startups in North Asia. Microsoft operates similar programs in countries including the U.S., the U.K., India, Germany, Israel, and Australia.
Microsoft said in an online post in August 2022 that the combined market valuation of their China alumni reached more than 400 billion yuan ($57 billion). While most Chinese participants work in sectors that don’t have surveillance applications, U.S.-China business ties are broadly being scrutinized by U.S. politicians, as the two largest economies engage in a tech innovation race.
Tophant
Year incubated:
2023, by Microsoft
Specialty:
Cyber security
Key takeaway:
Partnered with Chinese police in 2021, according to media reports. Advertised software that could detect anti-government content online in 2021, according to a company pitch deck.
Google, Nvidia, and Amazon Web Services — Amazon’s cloud computing arm — also run incubation programs in China. Rest of World found documentation, including press releases and media coverage, which showed that one startup supported by Google, LLVision, was providing smart glasses that helped police identify fugitives for several years before joining Google’s incubator in 2022.
Microsoft did not respond to Rest of World’srequests for comment, and Google declined to comment.
The Chinese government’s use of surveillance tech, along with internment camps, in oppressing ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang came into a global spotlight starting around 2019, following a United Nations report about it in 2018. The U.S. government has since sanctioned several Chinese tech firms, including DeepGlint, accusing them of aiding the repression.
“They were investing in more general infrastructure and foundations for technology that could be applied to all these different applications.”
It’s unlikely that Microsoft or Google were motivated to incubate Chinese tech to “supercharge China’s surveillance state,” says Jeffrey Ding, assistant professor of political science at George Washington University and a leading expert on China’s technological capabilities.
“They were investing in more general infrastructure and foundations for technology that could be applied to all these different applications. It just so happened that [from the Chinese government] there is so much demand for this one application: smart surveillance. And some Chinese companies failed to diversify from surveillance tech.”
“I do think there is some responsibility from the investor to have clarity about what the likely applications with the market are going to be, especially in the Chinese context,” Ding told Rest of World.
The Chinese state’s demand for social stability has contributed to a booming market for surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, and systems used to monitor online speech. By working in security tech, companies access not only government procurement contracts but also the massive amount of data collected by the state, according to a peer-reviewed study by researchers with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, and the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Digital Divinity
A nine-week newsletter series exploring the ways technology is reshaping spirituality and religion.
“For many of these companies, state contracts are the lifeblood,” Bulelani Jili, a Meta Research Ph.D. fellow at Harvard University, who has researched China’s cybersecurity industry, told Rest of World. Jili said the companies and their Western incubators likely did not expect that U.S.-China political tensions would ramp to such high levels.
Yu Zhou, a Vassar College professor of economic geography who has studied China’s high-tech innovation, said many Chinese entrepreneurs viewed their work with the police as improving public safety, without anticipating the human rights concerns such collaborations would cause in the U.S.
DeepGlint
Year incubated:
2013, by Microsoft
Specialty:
Facial recognition
Key takeaway:
Has worked with Chinese police since at least 2018, according to DeepGlint CEO statements.
Data Grand joined the Microsoft incubation program in 2017, according to its website and a Microsoft press release. Earlier that year, the company announced on its website that it had been providing censorship services to web novel publishing platforms to help it identify pornographic or “reactionary” anti-government content. (Chinese law holds internet content providers liable for illegal content on their platforms.)
After graduating from the program, Data Grand developed automation tools for Chinese police. In Wuhai, a city in Inner Mongolia, its “big data + artificial intelligence solution” system helped police trace the movements of travelers, as part of China’s zero-Covid campaign in 2020, according to a post on Data Grand’s website. Police also used its automation system to pursue suspects and combat phone scams, according to another post on its website. In the Huawei cloud store, Data Grand has since 2021 been selling a software tool that helps online platforms censor politically sensitive information, including mentions of Chinese leaders.
Cybersecurity company Tophant was accepted into the Microsoft program in 2023, according to a Microsoft press release. In 2021, Tophant partnered with a research institute under the Ministry of Public Security to launch a joint lab on cybersecurity, according to a state media report. In a slide presentation attached to a 2021 university intern recruitment notice, the company also highlighted cybersecurity software that could detect illegal content, showing examples such as “Communist bandits,” “Hong Kong independence,” and “terrorism.”
Data Grand, Tophant, DeepGlint, Hydata, and LLVision did not respond to requests for comment. Hydata hasn’t updated its online platforms in several years, and Rest of World could not confirm whether the company was still operational.
“If Congress and the administration decide the incubation programs are a bad idea, they’re going to eventually close them down.”
James Lewis, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), said U.S. administrations before Trump and Biden were more optimistic that “the U.S. and China would work together,” so policymakers were not closely monitoring business activities in China. But in recent years, criticisms of China’s surveillance regime and growing U.S.-China tech rivalry have put American companies’ China ties under increasing scrutiny.
This year, lawmakers grilled Microsoft Vice Chair and President Brad Smith, asking him if the company’s presence in China posed a national security threat. At the Homeland Security Committee hearing, Smith said that Microsoft’s China operations served the interests of the U.S., but it was reducing the size of its engineering teams in the country.
“No one was looking at tech companies’ investments in China five years ago. But they are now,” said Lewis, a former U.S. diplomat and United Nations adviser, who has advised on multiple trade negotiations with the Chinese government. “If Congress and the administration decide the incubation programs are a bad idea, they’re going to eventually close them down,” he told Rest of World.
The two startups that began providing policing services after they graduated from the Microsoft program continue to offer such services, while enjoying an extensive business network as incubator alumni.
Hydata
Year incubated:
2014, by Microsoft
Specialty:
Data analytics and visualization
Key takeaway:
Provided technical support to Xinjiang police in 2017, according to a company announcement.
Microsoft has showcased alumni companies at industrial exhibitions and organized networking events for them to meet potential business clients, according to event updates posted on Microsoft’s WeChat channel. The channel, which for years shared updates almost weekly, has not published any posts since June 17.
DeepGlint, the facial recognition company, joined the Microsoft for Startups program in 2013 and established its first office at Microsoft’s coworking space in Beijing, its founder Zhao Yong said in a 2019 interview. In 2014, Zhao’s co-founder He Bofei said in an interview that the company decided to develop surveillance camera systems because the market was big. It built a “joint lab” with the visual investigation team of the police in Urumqi, the capital city of Xinjiang, according to Chinese media outlet Sohu’s 2018 interview with founder Zhao Yong, who called the Urumqi Public Security Bureau DeepGlint’s “top customer.” The firm was sanctioned by the U.S. government in 2021 for alleged links to Beijing’s repression in Xinjiang. In 2023, Zhao also told Chinese media that the firm was one of the few that provided facial recognition services to the Ministry of Public Security. The technology has also been used to find abducted children, Zhao said.
Hydata, an AI data analytics company that joined the startup program in 2014, demonstrated its AI data-processing technology for policing applications and other services related to government work when Microsoft employees and other incubator alumni visited the company in 2017, according to a Microsoft’s own channel post on WeChat. Wang Lei, an executive at Microsoft’s Beijing incubator office, even provided an endorsement: “Hydata’s visualization system has a very high technical content, and it’s widely used, especially in the government and public security systems,” according to the same post. The same year, Hydata announced in an online post that it had been named a “technical support unit” for the Xinjiang police, adding that it serves one-third of China’s police market. Despite its ties with Chinese police, Hydata in 2018 partnered with Microsoft in launching a local incubation program in the eastern city of Hangzhou — one of more than 20 incubators Microsoft had introduced in collaboration with local governments and partners across China since 2015, according to a post on Microsoft Azure and Chinese media reports. Hydata has not updated its WeChat account since 2021.
LLVision
Year incubated:
2022, by Google
Specialty:
Smart glasses
Key takeaway:
Has provided smart glasses for police use since at least 2018, according to media reports and company posts.
Data Grand, the company that developed censorship and policing software before joining Microsoft’s program, co-organized an “open day” event with Microsoft in 2018 for tech workers to discuss AI applications, according to a post on the incubator’s WeChat channel. In 2021, it joined other alumni startups in a showcase event co-organized by Microsoft.
The company also makes glasses that can transcribe conversations for people with hearing loss, according to its online product introductions. As part of the accelerator program, Google helped the startup in developing and marketing these smart glasses for overseas consumers, according to a blog post from the founder published on Google Cloud’s website.
The glasses that LLVision had already developed for police featured cameras and facial recognition technology that enabled officers to identify fugitives from a database of suspects and share live footage with their colleagues, the company said on its website. International media widely reported on the glasses when police used them at a busy train station in Zhengzhou in 2018.
A Congressional committee on China in early 2024 accused U.S. venture capital funds of investing in Chinese tech companies that support Beijing’s military and its repression of minorities in Xinjiang. The U.S. government is enacting new rules in January to restrict U.S. entities from investing in sensitive AI, quantum computing, and semiconductor technologies in China, which would enhance the country’s military and surveillance capabilities. Venture capital funds and tech companies are responding to the changing climate by spinning off China operations and reducing investments in the country.
Anti-China sentiment in Washington is so high that even if future restrictions on China investments are detrimental to the business of American companies, it’s unlikely that any of these companies will complain publicly, says Lewis, the former diplomat.
“No one is willing to be seen as soft on China …,” Lewis said. “The [incubation] programs are bound to get shut down.”
Chinese immigrants in America are offering their living rooms and garages as warehouses to cross-border sellers on Temu, TikTok, and Amazon.
The mini fulfillment centers help deliver orders, examine returns, and sell excess inventory to local stores.
The U.S. government’s “de minimis” crackdown may pressure more Chinese sellers and platforms to work with warehouses in America.
In Eason Lin’s cramped one-bedroom apartment in Brooklyn’s Sunset Park, the living room is a maze of hundreds of boxes. All of the packages will soon ship out to Americans who shop on Temu and TikTok Shop.
Lin, 28, hails from a small town in China’s southeastern province of Fujian and arrived in New York in 2022. Lin worked as a waiter at Chinese restaurants for a few months but grew frustrated with the grueling hours and low pay. When he heard the logistics industry was thriving, he saw an opportunity. He turned his small living room into a makeshift warehouse, offering order fulfillment services to sellers in Shenzhen, China’s e-commerce hub.
“It’s a comfortable job,” says Lin, who wakes up each morning to check orders, print shipping labels, and pack items. He transports packages on foot, either in a backpack or on a trolley, to a nearby post office, since he doesn’t own a car. For every package he processes, he charges Chinese sellers about $1.
“I can potentially make it really big,” Lin said, hopeful despite the modest earnings. Although Lin struggles with spoken English, he is able to converse with postal workers and call shipping companies to negotiate rates on bulk orders.
Many sellers ship orders directly from China to the U.S. to keep prices low. But the U.S. government’s moves to crack down on cheap e-commerce parcels from China have pushed sellers to rethink their business strategies. Rather than relying on long-distance shipping, many now use commercial logistics companies or small warehouses like Lin’s.
Eason Lin checks orders and prints shipping labels before packing items in his New York City apartment.
As demand for warehouses soars, many cross-border sellers are finding it more cost-effective to store their goods in the U.S. This shift is driven by the rapid growth of e-commerce platforms like Temu, Shein, and TikTok, which have made it easier for small Chinese manufacturers to tap into the American market.
On Chinese social media platforms Xiaohongshu and Douyin, dozens of accounts are advertising so-called “family warehouses,” located in cities including Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and Austin. They offer fulfillment service, which means shipping out packages whenever orders are placed. They also discard excess inventory and returns. Some help re-label Amazon products when the corresponding listings or accounts get blocked, so the goods can be shipped back to Amazon warehouses under new listings.
The business operators include ambitious entrepreneurs who hope to one day run industrial warehouses and stay-at-home mothers who treat the job as a side gig. Kara Li, a 46-year-old mother of two in Los Angeles, said she is currently storing several hundred packages of comforters and lingerie in her garage. Like Lin, she prints out shipping labels and brings the goods to a UPS store every day.
Li, who immigrated to America years ago, told Rest of World that most of her Chinese clients were beginners in the cross-border e-commerce industry. They couldn’t afford working with bigger warehouses, which charge extra fees if the goods are not sold out in time. Li said she offers more flexibility with storage time, as long as she has enough space in her garage. “It’s not a lot of money,” she said. “It’s just I need to take care of the children, and there are no other suitable jobs.”
Similarly, Oliver Liang, 35, operates a fulfillment business, called Logixter, out of his Los Angeles garage. Liang moved to the U.S. 12 years ago as a student. After obtaining his doctoral degree in data analytics and working for a large e-commerce company, he launched the logistics startup at home. Liang now spends more than 10 hours a day managing inventory and liaising with clients in China. He also handles returns for Amazon sellers, sorting through products that can be resold.
“It’s less risky to start the business at home,” Liang told Rest of World. “Once I get more clients, I’ll look to rent a larger space.”
The business model has been around since the early 2000s, when e-commerce entrepreneurs sold made-in-China goods directly to Americans by having them stored in the homes of Chinese students, according to Hu Jianlong, founder of Shenzhen consultancy Brands Factory. Since then, massive warehouses and fulfillment centers have emerged as part of the booming e-commerce industry.
Amazon now owns hundreds of million square feet of industrial real estate, where the company manages inventory and sorts out packages for final delivery. “The large and medium-sized sellers will work with professional logistics,” Hu told Rest of World. “Small and micro sellers cannot afford that, and they will go to family warehouses.”
Sellers say they sometimes prefer working with family-run warehouses because of their low prices and willingness to handle small batches of goods. Onism Chen, a Shenzhen-based Amazon seller, said he recently shipped to a family warehouse more than 300 bubble guns that were no longer popular on Amazon. The family warehouse offered to buy up the toys at $3 each, because it could re-sell the toys to local stores. “These family operations are cheaper to deal with,” Chen told Rest of World.
Packages from China-based sellers are temporarily stored in Lin’s living room before being shipped out.
Despite strained U.S.-China relations, the American consumer market remains a top growth driver for Chinese e-commerce companies. Temu’s gross merchandise value totaled about $12 billion in the second quarter of 2024, according to a report from Chinese tech outlet 36Kr. The U.S. accounted for about 45% of sales, the report said.
Thanks to a “de minimis” rule that allows parcels under $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free, small sellers have in the past shipped packages to the U.S. by air. Although delivery takes two weeks or longer, they can avoid the high costs of storing inventory in America.
But the U.S. government recently announced a crackdown on the de minimis shipments to protect American businesses from the low-value goods from China. The regulatory change would likely commence before Donald Trump takes office, a former White House official said at a webinar. Analysts say the crackdown will pressure more platforms and sellers to store goods in the U.S., which also helps shorten delivery time.
Get The Global, our (free) newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter and we’ll send you our latest stories, dispatches from our staff, what we’re reading, and more. A world of tech, right in your inbox.
While family warehouses are meeting some of the demand, their capacities are limited and make up a fraction of e-commerce logistics, according to Juozas Kaziukėnas, founder of e-commerce analyst firm Marketplace Pulse. “As sellers become more successful, they will inevitably need larger space and more volume,” Kaziukėnas said. “So your bedroom service will very quickly run out of capacity.”
Industrial real-estate operator Prologis estimates that Chinese logistics and e-commerce companies accounted for 20% of net new warehouse leasing in the U.S. this year through the third quarter, according to a Wall Street Journalreport. Temu itself has partnered with several fulfillment companies in the U.S. to encourage sellers to store inventory there. Ben Pu, founder of warehousing and fulfillment company ShipSage, a Temu partner, said many Temu sellers were factories new to the cross-border industry and had struggled to understand the logistics and the fees involved. “We must adapt,” Pu told Rest of World. His company manages 700,000 square feet in warehouses. “We are simplifying the process and pricing to help them quickly start selling in America.” Shein has also set up its own warehouses in the U.S.
On a Monday morning in November, Lin printed out new shipping labels in front of his desk, behind stacks of boxes that contained wallpaper, lunch bags, utensil organizers, and sex toys. In his spare time, Lin watches American movies and TV series to improve his English.
He said the money he made from his warehouse business is not even enough to cover his $950 rent, but he hopes to profit when volume picks up. He is now looking to run a warehouse of about 2,000 to 4,000 square feet. Some of his potential clients sell auto parts and furniture, Lin said, and there’s no way his Brooklyn living room can handle those goods. “The economic slowdown in China is driving so many sellers into cross-border e-commerce,” he said. “That’s good news for both big warehouses and small
warehouses.”