MENU
ABOUT US
Subscribe
LOGIN
Premium
expand-arrow-icon
News Briefs
Startups
Stock Markets
Free Stories
Renewables
Current Affairs
Who reads us
Corporate
Companies
Start your journey into the world of startups, big business and markets by reading two stories on us every weekSign Up

Does Wikipedia’s open-edit model make its content any less reliable?

Despite questions swirling around the verity of the online encyclopedia’s content, its open-edit model ensures checks are built in.

13 November, 2024
8 min read
LinkedIn
Twitter
Gift Story
Does Wikipedia’s open-edit model make its content any less reliable?

Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, has found itself in the crosshairs of the Indian judiciary. As it fights a defamation case filed against it by news agency ANI, questions have been raised about how its open-edit model affects the quality of the content on the free online resource. 

To be precise, the question was raised by Justice Subramonium Prasad, who, according to CNBC-TV 18, said last month, “Anybody can edit a page on Wikipedia? What kind of page is this if it is open to anybody?” 

This question by the Delhi High Court judge came …

Subscribe to read this story
We publish over 500 original, detailed stories every year on startups, corporates, stock markets and economic current affairs.
Limited time offer $125 $99 for 1 year
SUBSCRIBE
Already have an account? Sign in
You may find interesting
How Wikimedia India went bust
An assembly of nearly 1,000 people seems inconsequential in a megapolis bursting at the seams. But for the Wikimedia cognoscenti thronging the neo-Gothic, stained glass splendour of Mumbai University’s convocation hall, 18 November 2011 was at once Anno Domini and a Calling of the Disciples—the day WikiConference, India’s first-ever (and flagship) Wikimedia event kicked off. Wikimedians from across the world congregated in Mumbai to enthuse about India’s role in the open knowledge movement. One of them was the man himself: Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia and its non-profit parent, the Wikimedia Foundation, or WMF. Just 10 months earlier, his foundation had formally recognized the Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN), an affiliate body tasked with promoting Wikimedia’s 13 projects, ranging from Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons, a free media repository comprising more than 50 million images, audio, and video files. India represented a hotbed of potential for WMF. It was the only non-European, non-North American country in the top 10 by number of Wikipedia editors. Imagine, then, what could be achieved in a region of billion-plus people: more heft for the free information …
Roshni P. Nair
04 November, 2019