File: apu_ss_uniform.jpg (240 KB, 1553x1320)

240 KB JPG

Yes, it’s possible.

>>487912309 (OP)
Anon, you want what men have evolved to want for 200 million years. Blood and soil. All moralistic blather that gushes out in excess renders in your mind as faggot shit, as it should.

>>487912309 (OP)
yes retard it's called being a nazi

ancaps are retarded golems. notice every former white country is capitalist and every "still white" country is not. capitalism is the death of whites. /pol/ is a board of national socialists, the only logical position

"Nazism" "Neonazism" "Neofascism"

what a politically illiterate chart.

File: Screenshot_20241109-18280(...).png (1.14 MB, 1080x1707)

1.14 MB PNG

Sumpin' like this?

>>487912783
>>487912997
>>487913028
But I don't like want to kill those people, more like I'd rather they just keep to themselves. Like I don't have a problem with people being gay or having gay sex or being gay married, I just like would prefer they'd keep it to themselves

>>487912309 (OP)
Yeah it's called dirtbag left. Left economics and left social issues, but no political correctness. That shit is so overblown anyway, just ignore it. You rarely run into people IRL who actually give a shit about that stuff. It's mostly just the terminally online who think like that.

File: the-upper-left-hand-quadr(...).png (148 KB, 710x704)

148 KB PNG

>>487912309 (OP)
like you have literally been pulled into retardism by americas insistence that there is one political spectrum from "left" to "right" and "left" means a gay communist and right means a bible thumping ancap

those are two separate axis and you can be totally socially "right wing" and "right wing" on the global/national axis but still be left wing economically and in authoritarianism

libertarians are overrepresented, believing they are the third axis of politics, pro ultimate freedom and capitalism. but in reality almost no voters are. pic related, the american third position is national socialism, not anarcho capitalism, which is a non existent autistic meme

>>487913372
Make a group of like-minded individuals within ethno-religious geographic lines then. That's the most practical answer for someone who wants to avoid conflict, such as yourself.

>>487913372
There is no other way.

>>487913372
right and who says being a nazi means you have to be pro mass slaughter?

I am pro mass deportating all the ethnics to a different country, and pro "no more gay pride marches but you can fuck who you want behind closed doors just shut the fuck up about it". same with trans desu, shut up, dress how you like, chop your dick off (though our doctors should not be pushing them into that and humouring their mental illness), just don't touch the kids. I don't have a problem with hoes, I don't have a problem with drug users who aren't monging out on the street (but I am against dealers)

all of that is fine? but just being pro nationalism, pro closed borders, against mass immigration, pro social democracy. no one needs to die as long as they leave us alone

>>487913547
Your hair is not coming back

>>487913587
also notice the points on the borders, which demonstrate that a huge chunk of the electorate are more nationalist than the poll questions account for, and more economically left wing likewise

File: 1730446791950185.jpg (372 KB, 939x619)

372 KB JPG

>>487912783
fpbp

>I believe climate change is a big problem and we need government plans and regulation to stop it
Like what? A carbon tax? That sounds like a bad idea. Here's another bad idea: white/"white" countries go to war with non-white countries until many of the non-whites are dead. Just nuke them. Blow up India. Blow up China. Total nigger death in Africa as a result of nuclear fire are radiation. I'm saying this is a bad idea. That would be a huge loss of human culture (though whites could take over those countries when the radiation dies down which would be a positive). However, climate change fanatics might say that this is a good thing due to temporarily or permanently solving climate change. So genocide might be better than climate change if you have to pick one or the other. Some days are pretty damn hot or cold, makes me feel like mass murdering. Billions must die, lol.

>>487913372
By "keep it to themselves" I think you mean act the same way as heterosexuals. So heteros don't go around telling everyone they're straight. Gays shouldn't do that telling everyone they're homo. Only bringing it up when relevant.

>>487912309 (OP)
No. You can disagree on policy all you want and still be allowed in the lefty club. You cannot disagree on trannyism and be allowed in the lefty club. Sorry.

>>487912309 (OP)
>Is it possible to be a socialist without all the faggot shit
That's basically what "nazi" as a slur refers to in current year.

The problem with the modern left is that the entire way in which they view the world is flawed. For example there is this tendency on the left to categories issues, policies etc as either "economic" or "social". This is nonsense. Let's take casual sex as an example. It's always presented by the left as a "social issue", entirely orthogonal to economics. But if people need to compete for sex then being better off than others becomes a survival necessity. Attractiveness is based on comparison, so it's impossible for everyone to be attractive simultaneously. There *must* be a hierarchy. Since being wealthier than others makes you more attractive, and wealth is more malleable than genetics, sexual competition incentivizes people to accumulate wealth. Because attractiveness is all about comparison, how much people need to accumulate isn't fixed. You need more than me and I need more than you. From this contradiction emerges the rat-race economy. This is clearly an economic phenomenon, but it's all a consequence of sexual liberalism, which we were told is a "social issue".

There are countless examples of this. The proliferation of single parenthood is presented as a "social issue", but single parents consume twice as much housing compared to intact families, and if demand for housing doubles then house prices will increase to reflect that. The proliferation of transgenderism is presented as a "social issue", but if more people become psychologically dependent upon pharmaceuticals and surgeries then this means massive profits for those industries. Etc, etc. When leftists split issues into "social" and "economic", what they are actually doing is unintentionally admitting their ignorance. When a leftist calls something a "social issue", they are just admitting that they don't understand the economic consequences.

>>487914482
Meant "nuclear fire and radiation"

>>487913899
>no more gay pride marches but you can fuck who you want behind closed doors just shut the fuck up about it
Like there isn't heterosexual pride marches. Makes sense. I think those don't change public opinion of gays anyways: maybe makes it worse if anything. Thoughts on gay marriage? I don't have much thoughts on that or have forgotten.

basically, you have been brainwashed into thinking national socialism is an evil ideology

communists under mao and stalin killed orders of magnitude more than hitler ever killed

capitalists created the trans-atlantic slave trade and industrialised enslaving other humans, hire children to mine lithium, use sweat shops and routinely firebomb countries that try to become non capitalists

christians swept through europe murdering slavs and balts. muslims swept through the med and the balkans

every large ideology ever at one point or another has engaged in mass murder. even liberal democracy genociding the congo, starving india and ireland. monarchy relegating everyone to a serf class for milllennia

so how come no one is ashamed of being a commie, a capitalist, a king, a christian, a muslim, a liberal, but you're ashamed of being who you are - a national socialist?

don't be ashamed bro. and what's more, go ahead and actually watch some nazi cinema like jud suss or read mein kampf or something if you want to judge the actual historical nazis from your own perspective rather than what you've been told to think. because suddenly when you see that they were right about the ussr, about the jewish german revolution that lost germany ww1, about the lugenpress, about building the strongest economy in europe, about transexualism, about paedophile rings, about degeneracy, about jews being disloyal to their nations, and media/financial manipulators, you would want a pogrom too

hitler interned them in camps because they were known and proven traitors. many incidentally died because it was during wartime when nations will low on resources. the original plan was to deport them to madagascar. the population of jews in europe decreased by 6 mill across ALL of ww2. includes ones who fought in the war, fled, died of disease and died of famine

look up hitler's reason for ww2. he wanted to take back German land where germans were being abused (danzig corridor)

File: 835568B1-55F2-4123-B482-C(...).jpg (464 KB, 1381x1536)

464 KB JPG

>>487912309 (OP)
Welcome home

>>487912309 (OP)
No. The principles that created and currently guide leftism (socialism, communism etc) inevitably lead to applying the philosophy to the social and biological world. Post-modernism and neo-Marxism weren't created in a vacuum, they were the natural evolution of leftist philosophy.

>>487915135
my thought on gay marriage is that marriage is not a political institution, it's a religious institution. I was raised catholic, I am atheist. So I have no skin in the game and don't really care, but I can see why Catholics would be mad because it is an insult to their sacred sacrament. Gay people already had Civil Partnerships, conducted by the state, which conferred all of the legal rights upon a couple that marriage does, just without the name marriage. They just wanted to get marriage to stake some victory over a god they don't believe in, it's just attention whoring, I am glad russia took an orthodox stance and told them to fuck off

straight people don't have marches like I AM STRAIGHT. LOOK HOW PROUD I AM. okay they kiss in public and shit (which can also be frowned upon). nor do their marches (except in degenerate brazil) include nudity, gimp outfits, dildos, dressing up as a dog with a collar, shitting and pissing on people in public (folsom street festival in sf), or swinging their cocks around in front of kids

personally I don't mind gay people but pragmatically, gay people by and large never procreate and have 0 stake in the future, are hedonists, usually end up being a tax burden because they have no kids to take care of them and spread stds like wildfire, so I don't think we should celebrate something dysgenic but I also understand they can't change who they are. but neither can a paedophile or someone attracted to their own family, doesn't mean there aren't logical reasons to find it to be overall a negative practice that should be quietly shunned

File: IMG_7975.jpg (27 KB, 585x596)

27 KB JPG

>>487912309 (OP)
Carlo cipolla knew the truth

>>487916674
Good point (reminds me of some things in observed in the past). Elaborate on it if you want. The only sin in the Left is not being Left enough. Perhaps neoreactionary philosophy and politics is the answer.

>>487915135
also, green energy is good. hopefully we get there soon, the main problem (well actually the real main problem is having to generate an excess in summer and store it but nonetheless) is that other countries produce vastly more energy than us. also our infrastructure is not built for so much electricity. we burn gas on site. if we replaced that all for green it would exceed the capacity of the national grid. also as it stands we aren't greed enough so it really means burning gas far away and transferring the energy lossily rather than burning it on site efficiently

either way I believe that technology will solve global warming without us needing to go out of our way but we still ought to nonetheless for clean air, which is good for our health. as a physicist who specialised in nuclear and particle physics.. I am actually against fission because I don't care how much people protest, it will never be 100% safe because the entire point of the process is to have an unstable chain reaction. we can do well at controlling it but you're always a natural disaster or computer malfunction or an imbecile away from a meltdown. and our meltdowns were actually good case scenarios, no rivers were permanently polluted. and remember, our reactors exist during PEACETIME, what happens when people are trying to sabotage each other's plants, either by bombs or by hacking (see Stuxnet e.g.)

and the effects of a meltdown last 20,000 years. I strongly feel we don't have the right to decide on issues that will affect 600 generations of humans. they will have to regularly replace the chernobyl dome for millennia. fukushima will soon be leaking tritium into the Pacific every day now that they ran out of silos to store it all. they will just dilute it until it technically passed WHO guidelines then dump it into our oceans, a beta source. it's evil stuff

>>487916728
Didn't know about the Civil Partnerships thing (unless I forgot).
>gay people by and large never procreate and have 0 stake in the future
I was thinking of that in the past: gays aren't making white babies and can't biologically reproduce. They could adopt though.

>>487917546
>Elaborate on it if you want
Leftism distilled is basically hierarchies are evil and those at the bottom of the hierarchy are being oppressed and exploited by the people above them (not just the very top). This is easily applied to economics, but what about other hierarchies? What about the hierarchy in a family? Leftism HAS to apply this question outside of pure economics, because economics is intrinsicly tied to anthropology. This is how leftism evolved in the 19th and 20th centuries. To ignore all this would make one some kind of bizarre hyper-conservative leftist who basically ignores everything written not about monetary policy. Even during the French Revolution, leftists were obsessed with flipping or destroying hierarchies; this is Day 1 stuff.

What matters is outcome, do what works. But for that you need power.

>>487918070
sure but few do, and given the high rates of paedophilia amongst homosexuals I am wary of letting them near adoption. plus having no mother figure is not healthy for babies. either way, if you don't have kids, you are more likely to vote extremely selfishly, and gay people do. they tend to be single issue voters who vote as a block for whatever candidate supports gay people the most, which is almost never the candidate that supports families and the future of the country. they are massive into identity politics and vote for groups that pander to their identity rather than on policy. so I dislike them for that reason also. I don't mind a liberal who is simply liberal because they have liberal views, but someone who votes liberal because they're gay/black/an immigrant without any policy in mind deserve no respect and undermine democracy by boosting gerrymandering

Liberals just want welfare, higher minimum wage, jobs, etc. Far-leftists want commie stuff like universal income, worker control and dealing with class issues in general etc. The power system doesn’t want to give them any of those things so they set up an alternative power axis based on woke culture which normies align with because that’s the prevailing power axis but it’s deeply alienated to actual leftists. Even far-left Communist activists are alienated by the woke shit. That’s why the Democrats LOST so many voters. Those 11 million voters who stayed home are all the alienated leftists who’ve been worn down by constantly being forced to accept trannies, fags and niggers being shoved into their faces in their own media spaces.

>>487918238
>this worldview is basically [my strawman]
>and see, my strawman doesn't make sense!
every left wing government ever has been based on hierarchy. social democracy is about the common good. the state educating other people's children is good because one day they will be the engineer building the buildings you stand in, or the doctor doing your surgery. running things like mail, internet, energy, transport to be effective at levels rather than just ruthlessly profitable provides a better quality of life for everyone who uses it - and everyone has access. healthcare without a charge at the point of use keeps a nation healthy and its citizens happy. housing keeps people from being in debt slavery for life and lets them start families at the age they want to

that doesn't mean you can't start a business or choose to make and sell products for more income to buy nice things, it means your basic needs are looked after by the state, because you are a valuable member of society who in turn contributes and makes society better for everyone

somehow I doubt you have a problem having nationalised police and armed forces

>>487917546
Meant "some things I observed in the past"

>>487917630
Perhaps fusion power will solve the problems. We'll be hearing "only 10 more years until it works" for each decade of the next 7 decades.

>>487918238
I think with hierarchies it means that someone always loses in a sense or there is a difference of power. Leftism follows the abstract ideas of "freedom" and "equality" religiously. Yes freedom and equality are good in some cases, but they are certainly bad in others. With the left focusing so much on the subjective truth of feelings, they could actually end up making some stereotypical dystopia where people are atomized individuals being reprogrammed by the government to be happy interchangeable cogs. That's probably what postmodernist philosophy is going towards. It makes some amount of sense I guess if you think that emotions or feelings are all the matter. That's my not-so-educated understanding of it. One could justify hierarchies and the real suffering of living in an imperfect world and society as being part of God's plan as the absolute truth. Other than that, you could justify it as just being how things are, and you don't necessarily need to change it as the far-left wants to.

>>487918591
far ECONOMIC leftists as in actual communists who think you shouldn't own things are a teeny tiny minority of people who will never get in power in the west. but progressivism, pretending trans women are actual women, gay marriage and rights etc, censorship of right wing views and so on - are staples of liberal beliefs. most people who vote dems believe all that shit

File: i-dont-appreciate-you-mod(...).jpg (1.39 MB, 2155x1212)

1.39 MB JPG

If only there were some ideology...

That was both socialist...

AND nationalist...

>>487919417
fusion required fission as a prerequisite. the optimal fuel source is a 50 50 deteurium tritium hybrid, and the only way to get that in decent quantities is as a fission byproduct. there will never be fusion without fission

but I do believe ITER will be energy positive, and I believe that with AI we will be able to control tokamaks better in the future to prevent turbulent flow which cools down fusion and stops it from being efficient

>>487912309 (OP)
The second part is what (((they))) came up with after they realized the working class won't buy what they're selling in the first part. It's called Cultural Marxism. There are a few screencaps out there that explain it in better detail but I don't seem to have them.

>>487919202
I don't think it's a straw man as much as you think it is. Read
https://wl.vern.cc/wiki/Postmodernism_in_political_science

In the US, leftist Herbert Marcuse, basically boiled "critical theory" down to freeing man from all things that makes him unfree. In the past I was listening to some academic talk about it and he said "an example would be ‘I have to stop at red lights and follow traffic rules’".

>>487913372
>like like like like
Faggot tranny nigger-brained onionoid.

>>487919604
If you are against nuclear fission plants, then are you also against nuclear fusion plant (fission required for fusion)?

>>487921251
This audiobook which I listened to years ago also proves my point IIRC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQcNjHNXnEE [Embed]
Titled "Explaining Postmodernism by Stephen Hicks: Full Audiobook"

File: 1719331126588413.jpg (47 KB, 671x450)

47 KB JPG

>>487912309 (OP)
>I want universal healthcare and dental care in america
Dentistry is a scam. Take Vitamins.

>>487912309 (OP)
yes it called family. You can be socialist to your tribe. Roughly to the extent of 100 people. This is the maximum scalable size for socialism.

>>487912309 (OP)
bro, you're unironically a national socialist