A taxonomy of green governance: A qualitative and quantitative analysis towards sustainable development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103693Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study proposed a taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development.
  • This study proposed the influencing factors of green governance to achieve sustainable development based on the existing literature.
  • A case study was conducted to evaluate whether a country needs to adopt a green governance policy to achieve sustainable growth.
  • This study provides some practical implications based on the findings of the paper.

Abstract

It is undeniable that our environment is constantly evolving and citizens are facing new issues and challenges related to the environment around the world. Green governance is essential to achieve the goals agreed upon by local and global governments. The concept of green governance makes it possible to understand the integration of the actors of each governance form during decision-making. In this article, we identify the research gap and propose a taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development. We used factor analysis to construct the taxonomy of green governance. We also proposed the critical influencing factors of green governance to build sustainable development. To evaluate the importance of green governance for reducing CO2 emissions and other energy-related consumption, this study conducted two case studies with empirical analysis on the OECD Indian dataset of green growth indicators. The Indian green growth indicators are predicted using a machine learning technique that employs linear digression, support vector machine (SVM), and Gaussian process. The analysis shows that the taxonomy of green governance—global governance, adaptive governance, climate governance, ecological governance, self-governance, energy governance, and information technology (IT) governance—are related to each other and can work on the same objective by pursuing different activities. In addition, the case study analysis shows that the SVM is the superior technique in terms of predicting the time series data in this study. Based on the analysis, this study suggest that green governance is vital for achieving global sustainable goals for future growth, and policy-makers should keep this in mind when making environmental policy decisions.

Introduction

Abnormal climate change due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and other energy-related consumption, has been an ongoing concern in the world since the beginning of industrialization, while everyone agrees that human activity has contributed to the causes of climate change. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) established an international environmental treaty in 1994 to address the dangers of human interference with the climate system by stabilizing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere for sustainable development. The UNFCCC was expanded to include the Kyoto Protocol, which went into effect in 2005 and was later superseded by the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement is an international treaty with members of 196 countries that addresses climate change mitigation, adaptation, and financing, which went into effect in 2016. The Agreement intends to strengthen parties' ability to adapt to the effects of climate change and raise sufficient finance. Through the Paris Agreement, many nations have viewed climate change as a global issue, prompting countries to reconsider and better understand mankind's place in nature, as well as the relationship between economic development and the environment. However, the international treaty is falling short of its own global climate change targets. Some environmentalists and analysts, for example, have criticized current pledges under the Paris Agreement as being insufficiently binding to meet the agreed-upon temperature targets. New approaches and governance instruments are therefore needed to address the challenges.
Green governance is a direct response to mounting calls to address the challenges posed by earth's climate problems in the way humans relate to them for global sustainability. Green governance provides an understanding of the integration of actors in a group's decisions and actions. For example, from the local to the international level, actors within the concept of green governance are not limited to states and governments, but include a plethora of public, private, and non-state actors, encompassing a larger and more diverse number of actors (Gupta and Sanchez, 2012). As a result, green governance is critical to achieving the globally agreed-upon goals of governments and other stakeholders for global sustainability. Li et al. (2018) created a green governance framework for cooperation based on sustainable development among enterprises, governments, social organizations, the public, and nature by investigating the synergy between humans and nature. While, Lin et al. (2019) proposed a framework of the green governance context along two dimensions (foreign direct investment (FDI) policy and environmental regulation) and contributed to the green governance literature by extending the green governance context typology, with a specific focus on EMNEs' IB strategies in different green governance contexts. However, the study focuses solely on the governmental pressure exerted on firms' IB strategies, but green governance systems involve a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, firms, social organizations, and the general public, etc. (Li et al., 2018). On the other hand, there has been little research on how different forms of governance are defined within the framework of green governance as well as how actors are classified within each governance form in order to carry out their activities for sustainable development. Furthermore, there has been little research into whether each separate forms of green governance are closely related or not to accomplishing global shared goals. For example, some researchers have argued that these issues deserve further investigation (Lin et al., 2019, Capatina et al., 2019, Mahmood and Orazalin, 2017).
Based on the above discussion and in the context of sustainable development, the research questions are being addressed in this study, concerning the extent to which governance can be form in the various interdependent groups under the green governance framework. Can we categorize the different forms of governance under a green governance framework? Are the different forms of governance interrelated? Is the green governance policy required to achieve sustainable development? In this context, the main objectives of this study are threefold: firstly, we need a single and simplified taxonomy of green governance to classify different forms of governance and learn their interrelationships with their key actors in terms of their key roles and objectives for sustainable development. To fill the research gap, a taxonomy of green governance is proposed to achieve the common goals of all stakeholders, as each stage of human development is closely linked to nature. Through the decentralization of partnership and collaboration of multiple actors, a taxonomy of green governance is needed to promote global sustainability. This will help researchers and policy-makers to understand and identify different forms of governance related to different fields of study more broadly. Secondly, we need to identify the critical factors of green governance to make appropriate decisions for current and future sustainable growth. Therefore, this study proposed the critical influencing factors to achieve green governance for sustainable development based on the existing literature. Thirdly, we need to determine if green governance is required to tackle the climate change and its related issues in achieving sustainable development. To do that, this study will conduct a case study to track the progress of the Indian green growth indicators for sustainable development. Finally, this study will provide some implications based on the findings of the analysis.
The main contributions for this study are summarized as follows:
  • First, this study proposed a taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development by classifying the different forms of governance and identifying their relationships with their key actors and their roles for achieving certain objectives to tackle the climate change and its related issues. To build the taxonomy, this study first conducted a literature review on the related topic to bridge the research gap and adopted an exploratory analysis. This study then builds the criteria for the analysis of green governance taxonomy by defining the key roles and activities that actors undertake in order to achieve their goals for sustainable development under each governance form. A statistical method (factor analysis) is used to identify different governance groups and analyze whether different forms of governance are interrelated or not under the green governance taxonomy.
  • Second, through exploratory analysis, this study proposed the influencing factors of green governance to achieve sustainable development based on the existing literature. The table matrix is built to support the proposed critical influencing factors.
  • Third, a case study was conducted to evaluate whether a country needs to adopt a green governance policy to achieve sustainable growth in the Indian green growth indicators provided by the OECD.stats (OECD 2021). A machine learning technique-linear digression, SVM, and Gaussian process is used to track the progress of the Indian green growth indicators for better accuracy results.
  • Finally, this study provides some practical implications based on the findings of the paper. The systematic overview which we represent in this paper is the first of its kind in the literature.
The remainder of the study's structure is classified as follows: Section 2 discusses a review of the literature and related works; Section 3 presents a proposed taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development; Section 4 suggests a critical influencing factor of green governance; and Section 5 conducts an empirical analysis of green governance. Finally, Section 6 discusses the study's conclusion and future research.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Definition of governance and green governance

Before discussing about the green governance, we must know about the concept of governance. The notion of governance is not new, as it can be described in a variety of ways, and there is no agreement among academics on its basic aspects (Kusis et al., 2017). However, Gupta and Sanchez (2012) define governance as "new kinds of regulation that go beyond typical hierarchical state action." Furthermore, Li et al. (2018) state that governance is an institutional framework that is utilized to

Proposed taxonomy of green governance

Today, many authors have paid particular attention to the study of green governance to promote sustainable development. However, existing research for sustainable development, lacks a conceptual taxonomy of green governance. Existing studies have not determined which kinds of governance are categorized under the green governance framework, their relationships with numerous actors, and what the essential roles of each actor are in achieving particular objectives to realize the goal of man and

Proposed influencing factors for green governance

The previous section of this study proposed a conceptual taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development. However, in order to make an appropriate decision for current and future sustainable growth, we need to determine what are the factors of green governance that promote sustainable development. As a result, in this section, we proposed the critical influencing factors to actively promote green governance for sustainable development based on the existing literature. The proposed

Analytical procedure

The objectives of empirical analysis are: first, we used a "keyword search" technique to construct the taxonomy of green governance for sustainable development (Al-Hashemi, 2010, Wang and Zhang, 2005, Goel and Yadav, 2013, Jha et al., 2013, Hulth and Megyesi, 2006). Based on the 136 references on the related topic of green governance, we created a data to build the taxonomy of green governance. We used the factor loading analysis to evaluate the empirical objective. Second, to determine whether

Conclusion

The concept of green governance is emerging day by day and many authors are particularly focusing on the green governance to mitigate global environmental problems in favor of a sustainable development. Green governance is a cycle in which each actor of governance must act from time to time for the betterment of society.
Based on the existing literature, this study proposed the taxonomy of green governance to tackle climate change and constructed a criteria analysis of each governance form to

Funding

This work was supported by Inha University Research Grant.

Declaration of Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (135)

  • P.D. König

    Citizen-centered data governance in the smart city: From ethics to accountability

    Sustainable Cities and Society

    (2021)
  • Y. Liu

    Sustainable development in urban areas: Contributions from generalized trade

    Sustainable Cities and Society

    (2020)
  • M. Mahmood et al.

    Green governance and sustainability reporting in Kazakhstan's oil, gas, and mining sector: Evidence from a former USSR emerging economy

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2017)
  • M. Mahmood et al.

    Green governance and sustainability reporting in Kazakhstan's oil, gas, and mining sector: Evidence from a former USSR emerging economy

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2017)
  • S.K. Mallick et al.

    Understanding future urban growth, urban resilience and sustainable development of small cities using prediction-adaptation-resilience (PAR) approach

    Sustainable Cities and Society

    (2021)
  • T. Mattijssen et al.

    The benefits of self-governance for nature conservation: A study on active citizenship in the Netherlands

    Journal for Nature Conservation

    (2018)
  • A.M. Nunbogu et al.

    Doing it ‘ourselves’: Civic initiative and self-governance in spatial planning

    Cities

    (2018)
  • E. Ostrom

    Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development

    World Development

    (1996)
  • C. Pahl-Wostl

    A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes

    Global Environmental Change

    (2009)
  • F. Peng et al.

    Discrimination of natural images and computer generated graphics based on multi-fractal and regression analysis

    AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications

    (2017)
  • K.W. Abbott et al.

    Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance

    International Organization

    (2016)
  • L. Albrechts

    Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective

    Planning Theory

    (2013)
  • R. Al-Hashemi

    Text summarization extraction system (TSES) using extracted keywords

    International Arab Journal of Information Technology

    (2010)
  • S. Ali et al.

    IT governance mechanisms in public sector organisations: An Australian context

    Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM)

    (2007)
  • M. Almog-Bar et al.

    Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review

    Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

    (2014)
  • A. Amran et al.

    The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality

    Business Strategy and the Environment

    (2014)
  • J. Armstrong et al.

    Strategic adaptive governance and climate change: Policymaking during extreme political upheaval

    Sustainability

    (2017)
  • J.S. Bansard et al.

    Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance

    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics,

    (2017)
  • E.B. Barbier

    Global governance: The G20 and a global green new deal

    Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal

    (2010)
  • J. Baylis

    The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations

    (2020)
  • M. Betsill et al.

    Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape

    Global Environmental Politics

    (2015)
  • J.F. Bissonnette et al.

    Comparing polycentric configuration for adaptive governance within community forests: Case studies in Eastern North America

    International Journal of the Commons

    (2018)
  • E. Boris et al.

    Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classifications, and data

    Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

    (1998)
  • K. Bosselmann et al.

    Enabling a flourishing Earth: Challenges for the green economy, opportunities for global governance

    Review of European Community & International Environmental Law

    (2012)
  • T. Bradley et al.

    Green governance? Local politics and ethical businesses in Great Britain

    Business Ethics: A European Review

    (2017)
  • H. Bulkeley et al.

    Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK

    Urban Studies

    (2006)
  • L.J. Cao et al.

    Support vector machine with adaptive parameters in financial time series forecasting

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

    (2003)
  • A. Capatina et al.

    The role of an eco-knowledge hub in leveraging intellectual capital green governance

  • B. Cashore et al.

    Designing stakeholder learning dialogues for effective global governance

    Policy and Society

    (2019)
  • S. Chan et al.

    Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: The road from Paris. Review of European

    Comparative & International Environmental Law

    (2016)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    A novel online incremental and decremental learning algorithm based on variable support vector machine

    Cluster Computing

    (2019)
  • G. Christoffersen

    The role of China in global energy governance

    China Perspectives

    (2016)
  • A. Clear et al.

    Nonprofit advocacy tactics: Thinking inside the box?

    VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations

    (2017)
  • F. Cleaver et al.

    Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: a critical institutional reading

    Ecology and Society

    (2018)
  • K. Collins et al.

    Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation

    Environmental Policy and Governance

    (2009)
  • B.A. Cosens

    Legitimacy, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem management

    Ecology and Society

    (2013)
  • J. Delman

    Performance Reviews, Public Accountability, and Green Governance in Hangzhou

  • B. Dieng et al.

    On'green governance

    International Journal of Sustainable Development

    (2017)
  • G.B. Doern

    From sectoral to macro green governance: the Canadian Department of the Environment as an aspiring central agency

    Governance

    (1993)
  • D. Doloreux et al.

    A taxonomy of eco-innovation types in SMEs: Exploring different firm profiles in the Canadian Wine Industry

    Sustainability

    (2019)
  • Cited by (49)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text