Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERDs)

  • Review
  • Published:
Current Breast Cancer Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Update on the most recent clinical evidence on selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR +), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HER2-) breast cancer.

Recent Findings

Despite effective endocrine therapies, resistance commonly develops during treatment of HR + breast cancer and mutations in ESR1 account for a large proportion of resistance mechanisms. After demonstration of the superior efficacy of fulvestrant in ESR1-mutated tumors, recent advances allowed the development of a novel class of orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), which are beginning to revolutionize the field. The first approved oral SERD, elacestrant, is currently used in the second-line treatment of HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and a number of other oral SERDs are undergoing clinical evaluation in both the metastatic and early-stage settings.

Summary

SERDs are a rapidly developing class of antiestrogens that show activity in treatment of tumors harboring ESR1 mutations associated with resistance to earlier generations of endocrine therapy, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis MJ, Llombart-Cussac A, Feltl D, Dewar JA, Jasiówka M, Hewson N, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3781–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Robertson JFR, Llombart-Cussac A, Rolski J, Feltl D, Dewar J, Macpherson E, et al. Activity of fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: results from the FIRST study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4530–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E, Dvorkin M, Panasci L, Manikhas A, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2997–3005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32389-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. FDA approves elacestrant for ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In: FDA [Internet]. FDA; 27 Jan 2023 [cited 21 Jun 2024]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-elacestrant-er-positive-her2-negative-esr1-mutated-advanced-or-metastatic-breast-cancer

  6. Clusan L, Ferrière F, Flouriot G, Pakdel F. A Basic Review on Estrogen Receptor Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brufsky AM, Dickler MN. Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Exploiting Signaling Pathways Implicated in Endocrine Resistance. Oncologist. 2018;23:528–39. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paterni I, Granchi C, Katzenellenbogen JA, Minutolo F. Estrogen Receptors Alpha (ERα) and Beta (ERβ): Subtype-Selective Ligands and Clinical Potential. Steroids. 2014;90:13–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2014.06.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:771–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burstein HJ. Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2557–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1307118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA. 2019;321:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.19323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, Davies C, Taylor C, McGale P, et al. 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1836–46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiino S, Kinoshita T, Yoshida M, Jimbo K, Asaga S, Takayama S, et al. Prognostic Impact of Discordance in Hormone Receptor Status Between Primary and Recurrent Sites in Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016;16:e133-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.05.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gnant M, Turner NC, Hernando C. Managing a Long and Winding Road: Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2023;43:e390922. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_390922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinert T, Saad ED, Barrios CH, Bines J. Clinical Implications of ESR1 Mutations in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. Front Oncol. 2017;7:26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Malorni L, Piazza S, Ciani Y, Guarducci C, Bonechi M, Biagioni C, et al. A gene expression signature of retinoblastoma loss-of-function is a predictive biomarker of resistance to palbociclib in breast cancer cell lines and is prognostic in patients with ER positive early breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:68012–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, Toi M, Martin M, Shao ZM, et al. Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3987–98. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, Sohn J, Paluch-Shimon S, Huober J, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3638–46. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im S-A, et al. Phase III Randomized Study of Ribociclib and Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2465–72. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:904–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30292-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cristofanilli M, Rugo HS, Im S-A, Slamon DJ, Harbeck N, Bondarenko I, et al. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Women with HR+/HER2− ABC: Updated Exploratory Analyses of PALOMA-3, a Double-blind, Phase III Randomized Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:3433–42. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1929–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jhaveri K, Im S-A, Saura C, Juric D, Loibl S, Kalinsky K, et al. GS03–13: Inavolisib or placebo in combination with palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Phase III INAVO120 primary analysis. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2023; 2023 Dec 8; San Antonio, TX. Available: https://aacr.ent.box.com/s/im3djx6fp13rad4kr3fmaf5ijj251pni

  25. Turner NC, Oliveira M, Howell SJ, Dalenc F, Cortes J, Gomez Moreno HL, et al. Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2058–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kornblum N, Zhao F, Manola J, Klein P, Ramaswamy B, Brufsky A, et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant Plus Everolimus or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Results of PrE0102. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1556. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, et al. Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:520–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1109653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Osborne CK, Wakeling A, Nicholson RI. Fulvestrant: an oestrogen receptor antagonist with a novel mechanism of action. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(Suppl 1):S2-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Long X, Nephew KP. Fulvestrant (ICI 182,780)-dependent interacting proteins mediate immobilization and degradation of estrogen receptor-alpha. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:9607–15. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M510809200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Traboulsi T, El Ezzy M, Dumeaux V, Audemard E, Mader S. Role of SUMOylation in differential ERα transcriptional repression by tamoxifen and fulvestrant in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019;38:1019–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0468-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallet A, El Ezzy M, Diennet M, Haidar S, Bouvier M, Mader S. The AF-2 cofactor binding region is key for the selective SUMOylation of estrogen receptor alpha by antiestrogens. J Biol Chem. 2023;299:102757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Q, Zhang N, Yang X, Feng S, Wang F, Zhang W, et al. ERα promotes SUMO1 transcription by binding with the ERE and enhances SUMO1-mediated protein SUMOylation in breast cancer. Gland Surg. 2023;12:963–73. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Osborne CK, Pippen J, Jones SE, Parker LM, Ellis M, Come S, et al. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3386–95. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.10.058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Howell A, Robertson JFR, Quaresma Albano J, Aschermannova A, Mauriac L, Kleeberg UR, et al. Fulvestrant, Formerly ICI 182,780, Is as Effective as Anastrozole in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing After Prior Endocrine Treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3396–403. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.10.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robertson JFR, Osborne CK, Howell A, Jones SE, Mauriac L, Ellis M, et al. Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women. Cancer. 2003;98:229–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Howell A, Pippen J, Elledge RM, Mauriac L, Vergote I, Jones SE, et al. Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104:236–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cope S, Ouwens MJNM, Jansen JP, Schmid P. Progression-free survival with fulvestrant 500 mg and alternative endocrine therapies as second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis with parametric survival models. Value Health. 2013;16:403–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, Sohn J, Inoue K, Pivot X, et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2875–84. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Turner NC, Ro J, André F, Loi S, Verma S, Iwata H, et al. Palbociclib in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:209–19. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lai A, Kahraman M, Govek S, Nagasawa J, Bonnefous C, Julien J, et al. Identification of GDC-0810 (ARN-810), an Orally Bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) that Demonstrates Robust Activity in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Xenografts. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4888–904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bardia A, Mayer I, Winer E, Linden HM, Ma CX, Parker BA, et al. The oral selective estrogen receptor degrader GDC-0810 (ARN-810) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR + /HER2 -) advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023;197:319–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06797-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Weir HM, Bradbury RH, Lawson M, Rabow AA, Buttar D, Callis RJ, et al. AZD9496: An Oral Estrogen Receptor Inhibitor That Blocks the Growth of ER-Positive and ESR1-Mutant Breast Tumors in Preclinical Models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3307–18. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamilton EP, Patel MR, Armstrong AC, Baird RD, Jhaveri K, Hoch M, et al. A First-in-Human Study of the New Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader AZD9496 for ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3510–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Robertson JFR, Evans A, Henschen S, Kirwan CC, Jahan A, Kenny LM, et al. A Randomized, Open-label, Presurgical, Window-of-Opportunity Study Comparing the Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Novel Oral SERD AZD9496 with Fulvestrant in Patients with Newly Diagnosed ER+ HER2− Primary Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:4242–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tria GS, Abrams T, Baird J, Burks HE, Firestone B, Gaither LA, et al. Discovery of LSZ102, a Potent, Orally Bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer. J Med Chem. 2018;61:2837–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jhaveri K, Juric D, Yap Y-S, Cresta S, Layman RM, Duhoux FP, et al. A Phase I Study of LSZ102, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, with or without Ribociclib or Alpelisib, in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:5760–70. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Andreano KJ, Wardell SE, Baker JG, Desautels TK, Baldi R, Chao CA, et al. G1T48, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, and the CDK4/6 inhibitor lerociclib inhibit tumor growth in animal models of endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;180:635–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05575-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Maglakelidze M, Bulat I, Ryspayeva D, Krastev BM, Gogiladze M, Crijanovschi A, et al. Rintodestrant (G1T48), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, in combination with palbociclib for ER+/HER2– advanced breast cancer: Phase 1 results. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1063–1063. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bidard F-C, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, Streich G, Montero AJ, Forget F, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3246–56. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bardia A, Kaklamani V, Wilks S, Weise A, Richards D, Harb W, et al. Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1360–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bardia A, Bidard F-C, Neven P, Streich G, Montero AJ, Forget F, et al. Abstract GS3–01: GS3–01 EMERALD phase 3 trial of elacestrant versus standard of care endocrine therapy in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: Updated results by duration of prior CDK4/6i in metastatic setting. Cancer Res. 2023;83. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS22-GS3-01.

  52. Rugo H, Bardia A, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Hamilton E, Hurvitz S, et al. Abstract OT2–01–03: ELEVATE: A phase 1b/2, open-label, umbrella study evaluating elacestrant in various combinations in women and men with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Cancer Research. 2023;83: OT2–01–03. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS22-OT2-01-03

  53. Kahraman M, Govek SP, Nagasawa JY, Lai A, Bonnefous C, Douglas K, et al. Maximizing ER-α Degradation Maximizes Activity in a Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Model: Identification of GDC-0927. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019;10:50–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chandarlapaty S, Dickler MN, Perez Fidalgo JA, Villanueva-Vázquez R, Giltnane J, Gates M, et al. An Open-label Phase I Study of GDC-0927 in Postmenopausal Women with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29:2781–90. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Metcalfe C, Ingalla E, Blake R, Chang J, Daemen A, De Bruyn T, et al. Abstract P5–04–07: GDC-9545: A novel ER antagonist and clinical candidate that combines desirable mechanistic and pre-clinical DMPK attributes. Cancer Res. 2019;79:P5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jhaveri KL, Boni V, Sohn J, Villanueva-Vásquez R, Bardia A, Schmid P, et al. Safety and activity of single-agent giredestrant (GDC-9545) from a phase Ia/b study in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1017–1017. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jhaveri KL, Bellet M, Turner NC, Loi S, Bardia A, Boni V, et al. Phase Ia/b Study of Giredestrant ± Palbociclib and ± Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30:754–66. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Martín M, Lim E, Chavez-MacGregor M, Bardia A, Wu J, Zhang Q, et al. Giredestrant for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Previously Treated Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized, Phase II acelERA Breast Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:2149–60. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mayer EL, Tolaney SM, Brufsky A, Gradishar WJ, Jhaveri KL, Martin M, et al. evERA Breast Cancer (BC): Phase III study of giredestrant + everolimus vs exemestane + everolimus in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic BC (ER+, HER2– LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:TPS1119. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.TPS1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Oliveira M, Sonnenblick A, Rugo HS, Jung KH, Yam EG, Hurvitz SA, et al. Interim analyses (IA) of the giredestrant (G), G + abemaciclib (A), and G + ribociclib (R) arms in MORPHEUS Breast Cancer (BC): A phase I/II study of G treatment (tx) combinations in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic BC (ER+, HER2– LA/mBC). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1061–1061. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Geyer C, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Rimawi MF, Hurvitz SA, Martin M, et al. lidERA Breast Cancer (BC): Phase III adjuvant study of giredestrant vs. physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (PCET) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early BC (ER+, HER2– eBC). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hurvitz SA, Bardia A, Quiroga V, Park YH, Blancas I, Alonso-Romero JL, et al. Neoadjuvant palbociclib plus either giredestrant or anastrozole in oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer (coopERA Breast Cancer): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:1029–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00268-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shomali M, Cheng J, Sun F, Koundinya M, Guo Z, Hebert AT, et al. SAR439859, a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD), Demonstrates Effective and Broad Antitumor Activity in Wild-Type and Mutant ER-Positive Breast Cancer Models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20:250–62. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bardia A, Chandarlapaty S, Linden HM, Ulaner GA, Gosselin A, Cartot-Cotton S, et al. AMEERA-1 phase 1/2 study of amcenestrant, SAR439859, in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31668-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Tolaney SM, Chan A, Petrakova K, Delaloge S, Campone M, Iwata H, et al. AMEERA-3: Randomized Phase II Study of Amcenestrant (Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Monotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:4014–24. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Lawson M, Cureton N, Ros S, Cheraghchi-Bashi A, Urosevic J, D’Arcy S, et al. The Next-Generation Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Camizestrant (AZD9833) Suppresses ER+ Breast Cancer Growth and Overcomes Endocrine and CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance. Cancer Res. 2023;83:3989–4004. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J, Bermejo de la Heras B, Calvo E, García-Corbacho J, et al. Serena-1: Updated analyses from a phase 1 study (parts C/D) of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant (AZD9833) in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1032–1032. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Oliveira M, Pominchuck D, Nowecki Z, Hamilton E, Kulyaba Y, Andabekov T, et al. Abstract GS3–02: GS3–02 Camizestrant, a next generation oral SERD vs fulvestrant in post-menopausal women with advanced ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: Results of the randomized, multi-dose Phase 2 SERENA-2 trial. Cancer Res. 2023;83:GS3. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS22-GS3-02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Im S-A, Hamilton EP, LlombartCussac A, Baird RD, Ettl J, Goetz MP, et al. SERENA-4: A phase 3 comparison of AZD9833 (camizestrant) plus palbociclib, versus anastrozole plus palbociclib, for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who have not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:TPS1101. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.TPS1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Turner N, Huang-Bartlett C, Kalinsky K, Cristofanilli M, Bianchini G, Chia S, et al. Design of SERENA-6, a phase III switching trial of camizestrant in ESR1-mutant breast cancer during first-line treatment. Future Oncol. 2023;19:559–73. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2022-1196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Baird R, Oliveira M, Gil EMC, Patel MR, Bermejo de las Heras B, Ruiz-Borrego M, et al. Abstract PS11–05: Updated data from SERENA-1: A Phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of the next generation oral SERD AZD9833 as a monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:PS11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS20-PS11-05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Jhaveri KL, Jeselsohn R, Lim E, Hamilton EP, Yonemori K, Beck JT, et al. A phase 1a/b trial of imlunestrant (LY3484356), an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (aBC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer (EEC): Monotherapy results from EMBER. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:1021–1021. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Neven P, Stahl N, Losada MJV, Jimenez MM, Kaufman PA, Harbeck N, et al. 273P A preoperative window-of-opportunity (WOO) study of imlunestrant in ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC): Final analysis from EMBER-2. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:S292–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.470.

  74. Jhaveri K, Harbeck N, Aftimos P, Kim S-B, Pivot X, Saura C, et al. Abstract OT2-11-01: EMBER-3: A randomized phase 3 study of LY3484356, a novel, oral selective estrogen receptor degrader vs investigator’s choice of endocrine therapy of either fulvestrant or exemestane, in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine-based therapy. Cancer Res. 2022;82. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-OT2-11-01.

  75. Samatar AA, Li J, Hegde S, Huang P, Ma J, Bunker K, et al. Abstract 4373: Discovery of ZN-c5, a novel potent and oral selective estrogen receptor degrader. Can Res. 2020;80:4373. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2020-4373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Abramson V, Linden HM, Crew K, Mortimer J, Alidzanovic J, Nangia J, et al. 565TiP A phase I/II dose-escalation and expansion study of ZN-c5, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib in patients with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:S619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Keogh GP, Papish S, Piskorski W, Ulanska M, Jackson B, Suster M, et al. 564TiP A phase Ib dose-escalation study of ZN-c5, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in combination with abemaciclib in patients with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:S618–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Osborne C, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Diab S, Juric D, Lathrop K, et al. Abstract PS11–26: A phase 1 study of D-0502, an orally bioavailable SERD, for advanced or metastatic HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:PS11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS20-PS11-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sincere NI, Anand K, Ashique S, Yang J, You C. PROTACs: Emerging Targeted Protein Degradation Approaches for Advanced Druggable Strategies. Molecules. 2023;28:4014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Lloyd MR, Wander SA, Hamilton E, Razavi P, Bardia A. Next-generation selective estrogen receptor degraders and other novel endocrine therapies for management of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: current and emerging role. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221113694. https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221113694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Patel R, Klein P, Tiersten A, Sparano JA. An emerging generation of endocrine therapies in breast cancer: a clinical perspective. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023;9:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00523-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.T. and A.K. prepared the initial draft of the manuscript text and tables 1-2. J.F. edited and finalized manuscript text and tables and prepared figure 1. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Foldi.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Foldi reports personal fees from OncLive, personal fees from Research To Practice Inc., outside the submitted work; and has received research funding (paid to her institution) from Conquer Cancer/ASCO Foundation and the Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, M., Kahn, A. & Foldi, J. Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERDs). Curr Breast Cancer Rep 16, 402–416 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-024-00563-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-024-00563-0

Keywords