Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation

Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism with $15 per month
Support us
Support us
Stopping ballistics in flight is principally the task of long-range air defence systems such as the Arrow 3 and 2 systems. Photograph: Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images
Stopping ballistics in flight is principally the task of long-range air defence systems such as the Arrow 3 and 2 systems. Photograph: Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images

Stopping Iran’s attack would have forced Israel to use sophisticated – and expensive – defences

Despite launching 180 ballistic missiles, Iran is likely to have wanted to keep most of its stock in case of a full-blown war with Israel

Iran’s decision to launch about 180 high-speed ballistic missiles at Israel indicates that Tehran sought to inflict serious damage in Tuesday’s night attack, unlike the well-telegraphed drone and missile attack in April.

Their sheer speed makes ballistic weapons challenging to intercept, but the initial reports of no fatalities within Israel and one in the West Bank would suggest despite the numbers of missiles launched it was a military failure, though some of the weapons or fragments appear to have struck the ground.

Tehran’s Emad and Ghadr missiles, used earlier this year, are estimated to travel at six times the speed of sound on impact or more, and take 12 minutes to fly from Iran. That would be more than 4,600mph. But Iran said it deployed the even faster, hypersonic Fatteh-2, with a maximum speed estimated at 10,000mph.

Iran has been estimated to have an arsenal of about 3,000 ballistic missiles, though the original calculation was made by the US two-and-a-half years ago, so the number may well be higher. Tehran will have wanted to retain the vast majority of its stock in case the conflict with Israel further escalates into a full-blown war.

Firing so many ballistic missiles in a few minutes also represents a serious effort to overwhelm or exhaust Israel’s air defences. Because they are sophisticated, the interceptor missiles are expensive – and their stocks uncertain.

Stopping ballistics in flight is principally the task of the long-range US-Israeli Arrow 3 and Arrow 2 systems, first used during the Israel-Hamas war, which are supported by the medium-range David’s Sling system. The better-known Iron Dome is used for short-range interceptions, often of rockets fired by Hamas from Gaza.

In April, a former financial adviser to the IDF chief of staff said that an Arrow missile typically costs $3.5m (£2.8m) a time, and David’s Sling interceptors $1m (£800,000). Eliminating 100 or more missiles would easily run into hundreds of millions of dollars – though the missiles themselves will have cost Iran £80,000 each or more.

At that time, Tehran’s foreign minister, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, said it had given neighbouring countries 72 hours’ notice of a planned attack – which took place a fortnight after Israel bombed Iran’s embassy in Damascus. This time, Iran acted within days of Israel’s killing of the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah on Friday.

Nevertheless, warnings that an attack was going to take place on Tuesday began circulating from US sources a couple of hours or so before the missiles were launched. It is unclear how the information would have been obtained but it may have come from satellite imagery, communications intercepts or a diplomatic notification. There were unconfirmed reports that Iran notified Russia before the attack.

It is not immediately clear how many Iranian missiles hit the ground; in April’s attack, of the 120 ballistic missiles fired by Iran only nine got through, causing minor damage to two airbases, meaning in narrow military terms that that attack was also a failure.

Iran had used more than 300 drones, cruise missiles and ballistics in April, but on Tuesday dispensed with slower-moving drones – indicating that they are felt to be ineffective against an opponent with a sophisticated air defence system. It may not have used cruise missiles either.

Shahed drones, also being heavily used by Russia in Ukraine, are relatively slow and can be easily shot down by fighter jets. Cruise missiles rely on manoeuvrability to evade air defences, but are also slow compared with ballistic weapons – Iran’s Paveh cruise missile travels at about 500mph.

Ukraine, which has been constantly attacked by Russian missiles and drones since the start of the full-scale invasion, released its own interception rates in August. Its success proportion would be lower than Israel’s, partly because the length of the war has meant it has run out of some types of short-range interceptor missiles.

Ukraine’s commander-in-chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, said that while 63% of drones were intercepted and 67% of cruise missiles were stopped, that dropped to 4.5% when Russian ballistic missiles were concerned.

More on this story

More on this story

  • US defence secretary tells Israeli counterpart Iran attack an ‘outrageous act of aggression’ – as it happened

  • Israel vows to retaliate after Iran launches unprecedented missile attack

  • Missile attack on Israel signals that widely feared regional conflict has ignited

  • Biden reaffirms US support for Israel amid Iran’s missile attack

  • Iran calls missile attack on Israel ‘legal, rational and legitimate’

  • Tel Aviv footage shows moment of explosion during Iranian missile attack – video

  • Moment hundreds of Iranian missiles fly over Israel – video

  • Iran launches waves of missiles at Israel hours after US warning

  • Iran rejects western plea not to launch retaliatory attack against Israel

  • Netanyahu knows he needs this war to shore up support. Iran should not give him what he wants

More from Headlines

More from Headlines

  • US elections 2024
    Walz and Vance clash over abortion and immigration in vice-presidential debate

  • Ukraine
    Ukraine accuses Russia of executing 16 PoWs on eastern front

  • Fashion
    Naomi Campbell’s charity reported to commission over Unicef link-up claims

  • India
    ‘Life is pretty brutal’: concerns in India over high-pressure corporate jobs

  • Sweden
    Swedish government accused of trying to ‘outlaw poverty’ over begging ban plans

  • World
    Taiwan shuts down as it braces for storm’s landfall

  • Brexit
    EU pushes Keir Starmer to open door to youth mobility scheme as PM heads to Brussels

  • Donald Trump trials
    Trump makes last effort to keep hidden January 6 case evidence before election

  • Extreme heat
    San Francisco sees hottest day of 2024 as heatwave scorches US south-west

  • Film
    Daniel Day-Lewis ends retirement from acting after seven years

Most viewed

Most viewed