Supported by
U.S. Intelligence Stresses Risks in Allowing Long-Range Strikes by Ukraine
Intelligence agencies concluded that granting Ukraine’s request to use Western missiles against targets deep in Russia could prompt forceful retaliation while not fundamentally changing the course of the war.
Adam Entous and Julian E. Barnes
Reporting from Washington.
U.S. intelligence agencies believe that Russia is likely to retaliate with greater force against the United States and its coalition partners, possibly with lethal attacks, if they agree to give the Ukrainians permission to employ U.S., British and French-supplied long-range missiles for strikes deep inside Russia, U.S. officials said.
The intelligence assessment, which has not been previously reported, also plays down the effect that the long-range missiles will have on the course of the conflict because the Ukrainians currently have limited numbers of the weapons and it is unclear how many more, if any, the Western allies might provide.
The assessment highlights what intelligence analysts see as the potential risk and uncertain rewards of a high-stakes decision that now rests with President Biden, who met with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine at the White House on Thursday.
The findings may help explain in part why the decision has been so difficult for Mr. Biden to make, and show the internal pressures on him to say no to Mr. Zelensky’s request. U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters and internal deliberations, said it remained unclear what Mr. Biden would decide to do.
Mr. Zelensky has publicly and privately lobbied for the authority to use the missiles to bring the war farther into Russia.
Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, has frequently employed threats to deter the United States and its coalition partners from providing more advanced weapons systems to the Ukrainians.
Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.
Adam Entous is a Washington-based investigative reporter focused on national security and intelligence matters. More about Adam Entous
Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades. More about Julian E. Barnes
Related Content
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Dustin Chambers for The New York Times
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times
New York Times photographs by Jenn Ackerman and Kenny Holston
Chris Carlson/Associated Press
Editors’ Picks
Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times
Giacomo Bagnara
Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Trending in The Times
Rebecca Smeyne for The New York Times
Sony Pictures Classics
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Michelle V. Agins/The New York Times
The New York Times
David Malosh for The New York Times. Food Stylist: Simon Andrews.
Joseph Rushmore for The New York Times
Richard Shotwell/Invision, via Associated Press
Advertisement