Wagner march was incredible, unprecedented to the extent most foreigners simply do not understand. Like, yes, Russia had its military coups in the 18th c. But those were the palace coups, all done by the Guards. Purely praetorian business with zero participation of the army.
Yes, there was a Kornilov affair in 1917, but that happened after the coup in capital. In March they overthrew the Tsar, then there was infighting in the capital, including a Bolshevik revolt in July, and only in September part of the army marches to St Petersburg.
Half a year after the coup. Not the same thing
I think the last time anything like that happened was in 1698, when the Musketeers marched on Moscow from the Western border. And then, next time, only in 2023.
(Army leaves the border/battlefield and marches on the capital without a previous praetorian coup in the capital)
One explanation could be:
Since 1917, Soviet/Russian leadership relied upon state security to control the army, control over army being *the* one true purpose of state security, and state security being *the* one true mechanism of controlling the military.
This, however, created an element of overreliance upon state security. Therefore, some (very limited) part of the military structure was largely relieved from the state security control, so that it could be used as a counterweight against state security, just in case.
That included the military intelligence (GRU) with its Special Forces. They were uniquely positioned as the military less controllable by the KGB, less permeated by the KGB, and less answerable to the KGB.
(so they could be used against the KGB, should the necessity arise)
Original Wagner group was a small (once again, small) mercenary unit that originated from the GRU Special forces. From the very beginning, it was way freer from the state security control compared to the normal army.
Which was not a big deal as long it was small.
In the beginning, it was just a team of assassins doing the dirty (= hitman) job in Donbass et cetera. Just dozens of gunmen. Not a big deal. Then hundreds. Again, not a big deal. Syria, Lybia. They gradually grew and their reserve (veterans not in active service) grew as well.
In the course of their expansion, they have largely avoided infiltration by the state security. Based on this book, Wagners were ready to recruit anyone. The military. The police. People with unconventional tracks (= e.g. French Foreign Legion)
Anyone, EXCEPT FOR THE FSB
It is noteworthy that normally the Wagners recruited anyone. The regular police. Prison guards. Drug enforcement. Customs officers. Foreign mercenaries. They overall were not very picky.
They just never recruited from the FSB. One and only exception.
Which makes sense. The FSB is the agency created to spy on and control the military. Therefore, recruiting from the FSB you will fill your ranks with spies, agents and commissaries. Obviously, if your recruitment policy is up to you, you will never recruit anyone from there.
Now the thing is. Normal, regular military do not have any choice on whether to fill their ranks with spymasters and commissaries or not. State security guys are forced upon them, no exceptions (including on the command positions). Otherwise, they could grow uncontrollable.
Wagners, however, used to be a small hitman unit in a direct contact with the upper political leadership.
Small -> Unimportant Direct contact -> Can ask for special favours
More like one extra group of thugs directly controlled by Kremlin. Small group, most importantly.
But they grew, grew, grew and after 2022 just exploded in numbers, becoming effectively an army corps with heavy weaponry, own airforce, air defence, etc.
Step by step, iteration by iteration. All of that apparently went without any serious infiltration by the state security.
So by summer 2023 you had a large army corps with heavy (incl. air defence) equipment and with little if any regular control. And so, the impossible happened.
Were they stationed near Moscow, they might have won. They were simply too far away, in my opinion.
What is particularly interesting here is the consequences. Or rather, the absence of consequences. 1698 was followed by the mass executions of rebel musketeers. 2023 was not followed by anything comparable
Prigozhin, the military commander Utkin, few mercenaries. And that's it
Implying there are tens of thousands fellows who participated in an attempted military coup, who are very much alive and often serving in various armed units, in various capacities. That includes both regular soldiers and their commanders.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
As a person from a post-Soviet country, I could not but find the institutions of People’s Republic of China oddly familiar. For every major institution of the Communist Russia, I could find a direct equivalent in Communist China.
With one major exception:
China had no KGB
For a post-Soviet person, that was a shocking realisation. For us, a gigantic, centralised, all-permeating and all powerful state security system appears to be almost a natural phenomenon. The earth. The sky. Force of gravity. KGB
All basic properties of reality we live in
It was hard to come up with any explanation for why the PRC that evolved in a close cooperation with the USSR, that used to be its client state, that emulated its major institutions, failed to copy this seemingly prerequisite (?) institution of state power
Soviet output of armaments was absolutely gargantuan, massive, unbeatable. “Extraordinary by any standard” , it was impossible for any other country to compete with.
From 1975 to 1988, the Soviets produced four times as many ICBMs and SLBMs, twice as many nuclear submarines, five times as many bombers, six times as many SAMs, three times as many tanks and six times as many artillery pieces as the United States.
Impossible to compete with.
Which raises a question:
How could the USSR produce so much?
It is not only that the USSR invested every dime into the military production. It is also that the Soviet industry was designed for the very large volumes of output, and worked the best under these very large volumes
We are releasing our investigation on Roscosmos, covering a nearly exhaustive sample of Russian ICBM producing plants. We have investigated both primary ICBM/SLBM producers in Russia, a major producer of launchers, manufacturers of parts and components.
Each material includes an eclectic collection of sources, ranging from the TV propaganda to public tenders, and from the HR listings to academic dissertations. Combined altogether, they provide a holistic picture of Russian ICBM production base that no single type of source can.
Overall, you can expect tech moguls to have much, much higher level of reasoning abilities compared to the political/administrative class. But this comes at a cost. Their capacities for understanding the Other (masses count as the “Other”) are much poorer.
E.g. Putin is much, much less of an outlier in terms of intelligence compared to Thiel. He is much more average. At the same time, I am positively convinced that Putin understands the masses and works with masses much better.
One problem with that is that too much of the supply chain for drone production is located in China. The thing with drones is that they grew out of toys industry. Cheap plastic & electronic crap that all of a sudden got military significance
That is also the major problem I have with "China supports Russia" argument. China could wreck Ukraine easily, simply obstructing & delaying the drone/drone components shipments. That would be an instant military collapse for Ukraine.
Both Russian and Ukrainian drone industries are totally dependent upon the continuous shipments from China. To a very significant degree, their "production" is assembly from the Chinese components which are non alternative and cannot be substituted with anything else (as cheap).
No, Israel being a republic causes it to be more barbaric towards the conquered population than Russia, and with no escape. There is simply no room and no possibility for any sort of integration whatsoever.
Were Israelis slaves to a Big Man, integration would be conceivable.
Crawling on the knees before your Big Man is Lindy
Scaleable, manageable, robust
Every nation on earth will concede to it, after the sufficient amount of sticks (and may be some carrots, but that is optional). Which makes it very, very scaleable
In contrast, crawling on the knees before an other nation is not Lindy. No people on the earth will ever accept it, no matter the degree of violence applied.
That's why republican dominion over the disenfranchised colonial periphery is always so fragile. Not scaleable at all.