Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Legitimacy: A Case Study in BP’s “Green Lashing”

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of legitimacy and, in particular the processes of building, losing, and repairing environmental legitimacy in the context of the Deepwater Horizon case. Following the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010, BP plc. was accused of having set new records in the degree of divergence between its actual operations and what it had been communicating with regard to corporate responsibility. Its legitimacy crisis is here to be appraised as a case study in the discrepancy between symbolic and substantive strategies in corporate greening and its communication. A narrative analysis of BP’s “beyond petroleum”-rebranding and the “making this right”-campaign issued in response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster discusses their respective implications for (green) corporate change. Further, the question is addressed why BP’s green image endeavors were so widely accepted at first, only to find themselves dismissed as corporate greenwashing now. The study concludes that where a corporation’s “green narrative” consistently evokes established narratives, its legitimacy will be judged against narrative, rather than empirical truth. Thus, the narrative will be more willingly accepted as speaking for the issuing company’s legitimacy, irrespective of whether it reflects substantive greening or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Cherry and Sneirson (2011, p. 1007), for instance, have argued that BP’s green narrative was so “wildly successful” because its cunningly added tagline “’It’s a start’ […] struck a nerve with American consumers” (ibid), who found their own environmental irresponsibility dilemma mirrored in BP’s greening paradox, “[f]or whatever their own carbon footprints might be, for whatever gas-guzzling SUVs they or their neighbors might own, for however many trips consumers made in their cars, they at least aspired to be kinder to the environment,” too (ibid).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Matejek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matejek, S., Gössling, T. Beyond Legitimacy: A Case Study in BP’s “Green Lashing”. J Bus Ethics 120, 571–584 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6

Keywords