The lackeys of the financial plutocracy who love to talk in a sarcastic and Gallant tone about those rates of support for autocrats in the order of 80-90%, in the sovereignist regimes they call "dictatorships", not to mention the adjectives, live well with polls based on 110% of respondents, for example. And here we get lost because we no longer know if they are just mere lapses in abundance, structural math problems or a natural and systematic need to stretch the rope and test how far you can go to make fun of the cognitive abilities of the foolish masses of "well-informed democratic citizens" who follow the "news", the "statistics" and the "experts".
We'll find posts according to your preferences and create a whole feed from them. Just sign in to check it out.
word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word
Awakening of the Dragon/China丨Пробуждение Дракон
Teresa Ng
The lackeys of the financial plutocracy who love to talk in a sarcastic and Gallant tone about those rates of support for autocrats in the order of 80-90%, in the sovereignist regimes they call "dictatorships", not to mention the adjectives, live well with polls based on 110% of respondents, for example. And here we get lost because we no longer know if they are just mere lapses in abundance, structural math problems or a natural and systematic need to stretch the rope and test how far you can go to make fun of the cognitive abilities of the foolish masses of "well-informed democratic citizens" who follow the "news", the "statistics" and the "experts".