Skip to content
1981
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1752-7066
  • E-ISSN: 1752-7074

Abstract

Digital audio workstations (DAWs) occupy a prominent space in the creative arts. Songwriters, composers, producers, and audio engineers use a combination of software and virtual instruments to record and make music. Educators increasingly find DAWs useful for teaching concepts in signal flow, acoustics and sound synthesis, and to model analogue processes. As the creative industries shift to primarily software-based platforms, the identities, roles, and responsibilities of the participants intersect and blur. Similarly, networked technologies change the space and place of creative activity. Now, the ‘studio’ exists virtually anywhere. For educators working with students, these changing paradigms present a series of challenges. This article explores the DAW’s possibilities across three areas: space and place, theory and identity, and pedagogy. The article advocates for a less technocratic model of teaching and learning with DAWs in favour of an approach that cultivates a balance of aesthetic awareness and creativity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00017_1
2020-08-01
2024-09-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, A.. ( 2018), Dawn of the DAW: The Studio as Musical Instrument, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Behind the magical mystery door: History, mythology and the aura of Abbey Road Studios. ’, Popular Music, 35:3, pp. 396417, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1819212862?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true. Accessed 5 September 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burgess, R. J.. ( 2014), The History of Music Production, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dinkelspeil, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Berkeley’s Fantasy Studios Closure came because of financial struggles. ’, Berkleyside, https://www.berkeleyside.com/2018/07/31/berkeleys-fantasy-studios-closure-came-because-of-financial-struggles. Accessed 15 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duignan, M.,, Noble, J., and Biddle, R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Abstraction and activity in computer-mediated music production. ’, Computer Music Journal, 34:4, pp. 2233, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/404254/pdf. Accessed 3 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Emmerson, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Teaching electronic music: Journeys through a changing landscape. ’, Revista Vórtex, 8:1, pp. 18, http://periodicos.unespar.edu.br/index.php/vortex/article/download/3430/2271. Accessed 2 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaston-Bird, L.. ( 2020), Women in Audio, New York:: Focal Press and Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Greene, M.. ( 1973), Teacher as Stranger: Educational Philosophy for the Modern Age, Belmont, CA:: Wadsworth Publishing;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Greene, M.. ( 1978), Landscapes of Learning, New York:: Teachers College and Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Greene, M.. ( 1995), Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harkness, G.. ( 2014;), ‘ Get on the mic: Recording studios as symbolic spaces in rap music. ’, Journal of Popular Music Studies, 26:1, pp. 82100.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hein, E.. ( 2017;), ‘ The promise and pitfalls of the digital studio. ’, in S. Ruthmann, and R. Mante. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Technology and Music Education, New York:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 23341.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hepworth-Sawyer, R.,, Hodgson, J.,, King, L., and Marrington, M.. (eds) ( 2020), Gender in Music Production, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. King, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Studio pedagogy: Perspectives from record producers. ’, in A. King, and E. Himonides. (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York:: Ashgate and Routledge;, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Knowles, J. D., and Hewitt, D.. ( 2012;), ‘ Performance recordivity: Studio music in a live context. ’, in R. J. Burgess, and K. Isakoff. (eds), 7th Art of Record Production Conference, San Francisco State University;, San Francisco, CA:, 2–4 December 2011, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/48489/. Accessed 3 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Manovitch, L.. ( 2001), The Language of New Media, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Marrington, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Composing with the digital audio workstation. ’, in J. Williams, and K. Williams. (eds), The Singer-Songwriter Handbook, New York:: Bloomsbury Publishing;, pp. 7791.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McGrath, S.,, Chamberlain, A., and Benford, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Making music together: An exploration of amateur and pro-Am Grime music production. ’, in Audio Mostly (ed.), Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016, pp. 18693, Norrköping, Sweden:, October 2016, https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2986416.2986432. Accessed 3 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McNally, K.,, Thompson, P., and Scott, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Towards a pedagogy of multitrack audio resources for sound recording education. ’, Audio Engineering Society Convention, Audio Engineering Society;, 147:October, pp. 18, http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=20670. Accessed 17 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Moir, Z., and Medbøe, H.. ( 2015;), ‘ Reframing popular music composition as performance-centred practice. ’, Journal of Music Technology & Education, 8:2, pp. 14761, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.8.2.147_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Morton, D.. ( 2000), Off the Record: The Technology and Culture of Sound Recording in North America, New Brunswick, NY:: Rutgers University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Norman, D.. ( 1998), The Design of Everyday Things, New York:: Basic Books;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pignato, J. M., and Begany, G. M.. ( 2015;), ‘ Deterritorialized, multilocated and distributed: Musical space, poietic domains and cognition in distance collaboration. ’, Journal of Music Technology & Education, 8:2, pp. 11128, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.8.2.111_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pras, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ What has been left unsaid about studio practices. ’, in A. King, and E. Himonides. (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York:: Ashgate and Routledge;, n. pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Randles, C.. ( 2012;), ‘ Music teacher as writer and producer. ’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 46:3, pp. 3652, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/484781/pdf. Accessed 3 May 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Romney, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Beyond audacity: Supporting sonic futures through the digital audio workstation. ’, Communication Center Journal, 3:1, pp. 13446, http://libjournal.uncg.edu/ccj/article/view/1590. Accessed 25 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schmidt Horning, S.. ( 2013), Chasing Sound: Technology, Culture, and the Art of Studio Recording from Edison to the LP, Baltimore, MD:: Johns Hopkins University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Slater, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ Processes of learning in the Project Studio. ’, in Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York:: Ashgate and Routledge;, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor, T.. ( 2001), Strange Sounds: Music, Technology & Culture, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thorley, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ The rise of the remote mix engineer: Technology, expertise, star. ’, Creative Industries Journal, 12:3, pp. 30113, https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2019.1621596. Accessed 17 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Toynbee, J.. ( 2000), Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions, London:: Arnold Publishers;.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Waldron, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ The convergence of networked technologies in music teaching and learning. ’, in S. Ruthmann, and R. Mante. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Technology and Music Education, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Walzer, D., and Lopez, M.. (eds) ( 2020), Audio Education: Theory, Culture, and Practice, New York:: Routledge and Focal Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zagorski-Thomas, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ How is theoretical research meeting the challenges of pedagogy in the field of record production?. ’, in A. King, and E. Himonides. (eds), Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York:: Ashgate and Routledge;, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Walzer, Daniel. ( 2020;), ‘ Blurred lines: Practical and theoretical implications of a DAW-based pedagogy. ’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 13:1, pp. 7994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte_00017_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jmte_00017_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
crwdcntrlscore