Let me make sure I fully understand the problem we are talking. We would like to design a new car sharing platform similar to Uber, Lyft, or other competitors with a focus on people with health conditions or impairments, is that correct?
Ok, great. To start us off, I would like to ask: do we have any specific group in mind? Answer: not at this moment, it is up to you to define the group. Ok great. Also, when we are talking about this group, can we assume that they are the users requesting rides? Answer: Yes, these users are the ones requesting rides.
Alright, so at this time we are looking to design a car sharing platform similar to Uber and others with a special focus on people with health conditions or impairments. We are being generic at this moment in the specific group, but we know that this group is the one actually using the app to request rides.
I will answer this question by walking my way through four different categories: 1. Understand the company and current market; 2. Understand who our user persona is; 3. Identify their pain-points; 4. Identify solutions to overcome these pain-points.
Is this approach ok for you?
Ok, awesome. Let me take a moment to collect my thoughts here.
So, we are looking to create a new car sharing platform. This market has two big competitors today, Uber, and Lyft. They are the ones driving innovation and the direction of the market today in the United States. Other countries may have some local solutions, but they all behave the same. The user, through their apps, request a ride from place A to place B. They are connected to a designated driver who knows in advance how much they will make on that ride. Uber and others charge a fee of that ride from the driver, making money.
Ok, now that we understand how this market works, we are looking to design a new platform for a specific group of customers. The best north start metric in this case will be user retention, i.e., how many rides have the user booked.
Now, let’s understand our user persona. We can divide our target audience in four groups: 1. User’s physically impaired; user’s visually impaired; Users who have mental health issues; user’s vocally impaired, i.e., not able to speak.
Looking at this population, I would love to focus on the second group. From my experience and observing the obstacles that some friends have faced in the past, I believe there is a big, not attended market here that other big companies are leaving behind. Is that ok? Alright, great. Let me take a quick moment to reflect on their pain-points.
Ok, so I believe I can summarize their pain-points into three different groups:
1. Ordering a ride: user may face difficulties in ordering a ride if they are using a new app and are not used to the user experience.
2. Finding their ride: imagine that you are on the 5th avenue in NYC and are trying to find where your ride is. For us, it is already complicated, imagine for a visually impaired person?
3. Arriving at your destination: how can these users be sure that they are arriving at the destination they asked for?
There are a few solutions that I can think of to overcome these pain-points:
1. For ordering a ride, we could develop an easy-voice navigation app where the user can, through voice command, define their pick-up and drop-off location. The app would speak out the final price, estimated time of arrival, and all other details and ask the user to confirm if he or she wanted to continue with booking.
2. Our company could provide specific devices to be installed in the driver’s vehicle where, through NFC technology, would connect to the user’s phone. The phone, then, could vibrate if he or she walks close or away from the vehicle. Once inside the vehicle, their phone would emit a sound or a different type of vibration to make sure that this is the right driver and vehicle.
3. Similar to the last feature, once arriving to the destination their phone can emit a sounds or vibration to alert the user that he or she has arrived. On top of that, in terms of security and keeping he or she updated during the whole journey, their phone could vibrate an X amount of time to represent the minutes remaining. For example, the user asks for a ride that is supposed to take 12 minutes. As the ride start it would quickly vibrate 12 times and reduce it every minute that they get closer to the destination.
Going back to our North Star metric, increase user retention, I believe we should focus on my last feature. The reason is that, for the first feature, all our phones already have voice commands that can be well adapted to any given app. Therefore, yes, we may improve user experience but that won’t differentiate us from the competitions. For the second feature, it sounds a great idea, however, we are now talking about a new hardware and software development. On top of that, NFC technology, as of today, requires close proximity to work well. We could use Bluetooth or other technologies, but there is always the possibility of interference, which could ruin the user’s experience and decrease user retention.
The last feature sounds like a way for us to differentiate from the competitors and I would like to expand a little bit on that. It seems like an easy implementation solution that could bring a lot of benefits for the end-user as it would empower them to be the owners of their journey. They would understand from the moment they are inside the car until the moment they are done with the ride what is going on and how long would it still take for them to arrive. It is a discrete solution if we go with the vibration option, which increases security. Talking about security, we could add on top of this feature future add-ons, for example, if the driver, for some reason, goes into a different direction or decides to take a different route, say, for kidnapping or other more concern issues like that, the app could identify that and connect the user to their safety contacts or even the police.
One downside of this solution is that it can be easily copied by competitors. However, today, none of the competitors have this option available. Once we have this app and feature in the market, visually impaired are loyal type of users who dislike changing from app to app because of all its learning curve. As we keep creating adds-on and features to this new app we will differentiate ourselves from the beginning and acquire these loyal users, making it less likely for them to move to competitors. Finally, a last side, however, not last important issue may be on acquisition of drivers. Most of the drivers, on the other hand, are already on all these platforms and have little benefit to migrate to a new one. We would need to focus a big effort in marketing and benefits for them to move to our new platform, however, having the right capital funds I am certain we can find the right user acquisition solution.
In summary, we were looking into designing a new car sharing platform for the disabled people. More specific, we are looking into the visually impaired group. Our North Star metric is user retention, and we are focusing on developing a solution to help this group be the owners of their own ride journey by alerting them at each minute of the ride. They can expect when they will arrive at their locations and will have safety features included in if, for some reason, the driver decides on a negative/dangerous behavior. There are some downsides that we need to be aware of, first, on the competitors copying our solution and secondly on acquiring enough drivers to our new platform. The first is easily solved as this group tends to not move platforms frequently because of the learning curve. The second can be worked on by having the right marketing and funds to promote user acquisition.