I answered this question elsewhere, but I will leave my response here for those who are following it:

I always thought his IQ was somewhere between 140 and 150.

He is certainly at the entry level of genius, but not further. He understands the entire system that runs society, and many of the intricacies that play into the cause and effect. He can see past brainwashing campaigns that take out many of the “smartest” people in public life. He is often quick and articulate in his responses about a variety of subjects. Add to the fact that he had a high chess score when he was a child and has figured out a way to make a ton of money. Granted, financial success is only partially correlated with intelligence. A lot has to do with luck, connections, timing, rules in your favor, and a willingness to make pivotal decisions based on your ethical parameters.

The reason I say Tate is at the very beginning of genius (145–159 IQ category) or just below (140+) is because there are different tiers to genius. The lowest tier is the tier that understands all of the mechanisms of control that bind society. These are typically the teachers and explainers of this world. They find a way to take higher truths and make them more palatable to the masses.

The next level up (tier 2, i.e high genius, 160–174 IQ) are the thinkers who provide new frameworks for understanding things and end up creating content which basic-level geniuses learn and then teach. Since Tate never seems to take his conversation beyond learning and regurgitating (pun intended), it is clear that he's not a second tier genius.

Of course, the third tier genius, i.e. highest genius (175–189 IQ), are usually responsible for advanced breakthroughs in society and discoveries that are extremely esoteric. They largely go unnoticed, except by the intellectual communities who then utilize their ideas and integrate them into society many years later.

The last group would be the immeasurable genius— those with a theoretical IQ of 190+. These are normally the wonders of society, who live reclusive lives and end up dying in obscurity. Oftentimes, their advancements are beyond the ability of man to understand and integrate.

To conclude, It's very reasonable to measure Andrew Tate’s IQ between 140 and 150. He would make it seem like he is in the immeasurable category, but you have to see past the pompous display and character acting to really judge based on the contextual understanding of his message.

Wow.wow. inflated grades

I can't even begin to guess Tate’s IQ. All I can say is that he is very good at impressing dumb people by pretending to be one of them. But as for your paragraph about 2nd tier geniuses, Tate doesn't go beyond learning and regurgitating, because he doesn't need to. It’s not a part of his business mod…

Very interesting insights. He can spin things and monetize them well. His secret is self-confidence and throwing out the rule book. You really think he gets talking points from reclusive online incel bubbles? A lot of what he says is pretty overarching in terms of vantage point.

I would say he is close to 100–115. Highly Unlikely. I doubt he can hold a conversation with Ben Shapiro on very technical matters or Jordan peterson or destiny.

Elliott Kelley
· 6y
What are the traits and characteristics that distinguish people having different IQ levels? Suppose the IQ levels are 85-100, 100-115, 115-130, 130-145, 145-160, 160+.
I have my own chart that separates ranges by 20 points, and describes the depth of thought, or how that person thinks about things. People with an IQ of X think in terms of: 50–70: actions 70–90: labels 90–110: feelings 110–130: logic 130–150: patterns 150–170: fuzzy logic 170–190: fuzzy patterns 190–210: “heart of the problem” So for example, 90–110 is more likely to talk about how something makes them feel, while 110–130 is more likely to talk about the details of something and ask for scientific evidence. 150+ is genius range, where the person is capable of using a thought to think about something completely unrelated. The fuzzy application of fuzzy concepts. 190–210 is the range where people don’t really care about the details, and instead care about the long-term implications of the core principles that were used to create the concept in question. 70–90 doesn’t understand that words have definitions and meaning, they think words are just for grouping things together into categories. Someone on the low end of a range will find it difficult to understand the thoughts of someone in the next range up; while someone on the high end of a range might find it easy to understand such thoughts, though would have never thought of it themselves. I estimate my IQ to be 195, and I’ve found that this chart is very useful for estimating someone’s IQ in general. Generally speaking, most IQ tests are fairly pattern focused, which means they were created by people with an IQ in the 130–150 range, which means they’re generally not capable of consistently measuring IQ higher than 140. Any IQ test that requires a perfect score for full marks is a faulty IQ test anyway. I don’t know about the ranges below 50, and I don’t know what might be higher than 210.

What about destiny? Does this video prove andrew tate isn’t higly intelligent watch from 37:49– 40:41

View 36 other answers to this question
Profile photo for Geddy Friedman
Polymath & Renaissance Man
Owner at The Friedman Press2017–present
Lives in Los Angeles
613.9K content views10.2K this month
Active in 1 Space
Joined January 2014
About · Careers · Privacy · Terms · Contact · Languages · Your Ad Choices · Press ·
© Quora, Inc. 2024