Biofuels an alternative to traditional fossil fuels: A comprehensive review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2023.103503Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Biofuels are fossil fuel alternatives produced from agricultural biomass or other organic matter; considered sustainable, eco-friendly, and bioeconomic biofuels have come up as a topic of discussion for over a decade. Their practical use depends on the production methods, low cost-technology implementation, and substrate used. This review gives an insight into different generations of biofuels with their applications and implications. First-generation biofuels are produced from edible biomass, but even in highly efficient processes, their yield isn't enough to cast them as a better alternative to conventional fuels. The second-generation biofuels are produced from non-edible biomass, where the substrate is eco-friendly and provides a sustainable use of solid waste, but the pretreatment is overpriced and sophisticated technology is needed to carry out the process. Third-generation biofuels are produced from substrates like seaweed or microalgae for which no specific area or separate cultivation process is required. Biofuels such as biohydrogen produced through microbial dark fermentation, bio-syngas generated via gasification, and biodiesel obtained through transesterification, have emerged as promising and environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional fuels. These biofuels have the potential to pave the way for a bioeconomic system of fuel production, offering economic viability and efficiency. However, extensive research conducted in the field of bioenergy, several challenges persist, hindering their commercialization prospects. To overcome the problems of first, second and third-generation biofuels, fourth-generation biofuels are under development using techniques like co-culturing, nanotechnology, and genetically modified organisms. Future generations of biofuels would set a system for a circular bioeconomic pathway for sustainable development in the fuel industry.

Introduction

The 20th century witnessed the emergence of climate change as one of the most critical problems the world is currently facing. There is plenty of proof that human civilization is the primary cause of this climate change and that its effects are having an impact on global food and energy supply, economic and political stability, and migratory patterns [1]. The primary cause of this issue is the heavy reliance that has impact on fossil fuels, which account for nearly 80 % of all energy consumption worldwide [2]. Fossil fuels have traditionally been the main source of energy. However, the supply of fossil fuels will inevitably decline as fuel consumption rises. To combat the extraordinary rate of climate change brought on by the increase of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, there is a clear need to shift energy dependency from fossil fuels to alternative energy sources. According to BBC 2022 reports, China is the leading producer of carbon emissions followed by the US, India, Russia, Japan, Iran, Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and Indonesia [3]. To achieve the energy demand and economic goals the U.S. Department of Energy offers information that, the fleet and other transportation finds a way through alternative renewable fuels [4]. Renewable energy sources include solar, organic, wind and hydrothermal are quite important right now. The main elements driving the need to convert to an alternative solution are the reduced potential for pollution and the reduced impact on global warming. Most likely, to meet the world’s energy demands, interest is growing in biofuels that can be produced form organic material, diverse biomass feedstock both terrestrial plants and aquatic algae, have been found to provide sustainable fuels to replace fossil fuels [5]. Because they emit less carbon than other conventional fuels, biofuels are a more environmentally friendly substitute for traditional, non-renewable fossil fuels [6]. Fig. 1 compares the harmful effects of fossil fuels with the beneficial effects of biofuels.

One of the biofuels that are frequently produced is ethanol. In addition to bioethanol, other types of biofuels include biodiesel, bio-oil, biogas, and biohydrogen, which are frequently found in solid, liquid and gaseous forms [7]. The biofuels are categorized into first, second, third and fourth-generation biofuels which are based on the manufacturing process and feedstocks [8]. When it comes to the production of biofuels, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generations contribute more. Fig. 2 shows the production of biofuels in various nations in the year 2022.

There are two types of production of bioenergy: “Traditional and Modern” [9]. The traditional use of biomass is primarily in households for cooking and heating but also within small-scale industries. While there is still a need for improvement in terms of traditional biomass sustainability, and effectiveness. But modern bioenergy contributes four times as much to the total amount of renewable energy like solar photovoltaic and wind combined by advance. It is anticipated to contribute 3 % to electricity output and about 4 % to the need for transportation energy [10].

Whereas in the production of solid waste agricultural feedstocks play a significant role in which crop residue, agro-industrial waste, livestock waste and algal matter and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) are the examples of biomass that have ultimate biochemical and lignocellulosic analysis [11]. India alone makes 350 million tonnes of organic waste from agriculture. Agricultural waste contains lignocellulosic content, which can be used in biochemical and thermochemical conversion pathways to produce biofuels. The pellets, briquettes, and biochar are the solid biomass conversion product after densification and thermal process such as pelletizing [12], briquetting [13], pyrolysis [14], torrefaction [15], and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)[16] which have less moisture content, higher calorific value and more stable in nature [17]. The biochemical approach uses enzymes and microbes to break down biomass into precursors (amino acids, sugar and fatty acids) that are transformed into liquid biofuels like biodiesel, and crude oil by transesterification of fatty acids, bioethanol by fermentation of starch, methanol, and butanol by distillation of dry woods and biogas by aerobic sludge through biological, biochemical, and thermochemical [18].

The USA and Brazil are two important bioethanol, biodiesel producers and consumers. The USA uses maize, while Brazil makes ethanol from sugar cane in order to create low-cost and high production using solid feedstock [19]. The OECD-FAO 2023 Agriculture Outlook 2015–2025 predicts a modern increase in worldwide ethanol production from 115.6 billion liters in 2015 to almost 128.4 billion by 2025. Currently, the USA is followed by the EU which succeeded Brazil in the production of bioethanol. On average America generated 86 billion liters of bioethanol in 2018. As a result, this country became the world’s greatest producer of bioethanol [20].

Hence, the Inflation Reduction Act, which includes benefits for renewable biodiesel, and sustainable aviation fuel as well as supports the infrastructure and production of biofuels was enacted by the US in 2022. Also supporting increased biofuel demands in the upcoming years are India- higher ethanol blending [21], Canada- clean fuel standards [22], Brazil-RenovaBio, U.S-California and Oregon low carbon fuel standards (LCFS) and other states considering LCFSs probably grow in coming decade in order substantial decline in overall energy demands [23].

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the management of crops and woody biomass waste in agriculture. Furthermore, it explores how these waste materials can be effectively utilized through strategic management to produce biofuels as an eco-friendly alternative to fossil fuels, thereby benefiting both the environment and human health. The discussion encompasses detailed insights into 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation biofuels, including their production techniques, pretreatment approaches, and associated constraints. This review also focuses on cutting-edge methods for increasing the productivity of biofuel generation from non-food sources like algae and other waste products.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your institution

Section snippets

Agricultural waste

Plant residues, manure, and agricultural waste are valuable sources that can be utilized to generate biofuels. These bioenergy resources play a crucial role in addressing various challenges, including climate change, economic development, environmental sustainability, and social security. Bioenergy is widely recognized as a clean and renewable energy source. Agricultural waste, in particular, holds great potential as an energy resource. Crop residues, such as leftover stalks, straws, husks, and

Fossil fuels in contrast to biofuels

The use of fossil fuels as the primary source of energy generation is already causing various effects on natural resources, the environment and human health. Even though the production of biofuels emits GHG at several stages of the process, EPA’s (2010) analysis of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) depicted that several types of biofuels could yield lower lifecycle GHG emissions than gasoline over a 30-year time horizon, this emission scale decreases as we move from the first to second and then

Biofuel and bioenergy types

The agriculture sector produces a big part of lignocellulose biomass as a waste product, which is used as a substrate for various biofuels and bioenergy generation processes [39], [40]. Fig. 4 discusses about the production and utilization of different types of biofuels generated from various resources such as first, second, third and fourth generations,

Biofuel production using co-cultivation systems

The production strategy for sustainable alternatives has gained pace in recent years, with conventional production of bioethanol, biobutanol, and biodiesel lacking in practicality. Bioethanol, biobutanol, and biodiesel have been produced using newer co-culturing techniques to enhance the efficiency of the process. This production strategy is gaining fame; it simply means culturing various cells together to facilitate a broader substrate utilization spectrum. The substrate is agricultural

Advantages

  • 1.

    Economic impact: biofuels cost similar to traditional fuels but have a smaller carbon footprint. In the long run, they tend to be more efficient with a reduced effect on the environment, with lesser emissions and fewer bioproducts they have an overall better economic value for a similar product [53]

  • 2.

    Adaptability: biofuels can easily work with current engine designs. They are less flammable, more lubricated and have higher cetane. In many cases inter engine conversion is also not required which

Pretreatment

Biomass pretreatment is often performed to successfully separate the interlinked components, such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in order to increase the accessibility of cellulose to enzymes for the production of biofuel. Physical, chemical, physicochemical, and biological approaches can be used to perform pretreatment [59]. The pretreatment method is the primary treatment method provided to the biomass to form biofuel, as it forms a monomer, which upon fermentation further degrades to

Green-like Pretreatment

Green-like pretreatments make use of chemical waste from industries or liquid hot water. In the case of green liquor treatment, it makes use of a smelt solution (mixture of sodium sulphide and sodium carbonate). It carries out delignification in moderate alkaline conditions by selectively extracting lignin out of the lignocellulosic biomass. It has been known to produce less toxic or corrosive byproducts that prevent equipment damage [78]. Reducing recalcitrance in bamboo, it was shown that

Enhancement to enzymatic saccharification using surfactants

The use of surfactant following a pretreatment method has been found to enhance biomass saccharification. Tween acts as a powerful surfactant that is known to dissociate the cell wall polymers or increase the cellulases enzyme activity. When used in steam-exploded residues, it blocks the cellulase adsorption to lignin leading to an increased enzymatic saccharification and bioethanol conversion in the common reed [93]. Silwet L-77, a chemical surfactant, showed increased sugar-ethanol conversion

Future prospects

The promising advancements in the production of biofuels through eco-friendly approaches have led to the development of multiple processes to utilize the abundantly available agricultural waste. Production of biofuels through agricultural waste has been examined to have an increase in the capital cost of the pretreatment stage. The additional costs and high energy requirements for the production of biofuel should be minimized to produce a carbon–neutral product. Studies indicated that both CO2

Conclusions

This study focused on the eco-friendliness and carbon naturalness of three generations of biofuels, highlighting significant examples and discussing a production strategy involving co-culturing to broaden substrate utilization. Biofuels offer various advantages, including economic benefits, a smaller carbon footprint, high adaptability, and easy substrate availability. However, they also come with some limitations, such as high initial investment, impacts on current crop utilization, industrial

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Lubhan Cherwoo: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation. Ishika Gupta: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. G. Flora: Supervision, Investigation, Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft. Ritu Verma: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation. Muskaan Kapil: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Shailendra Kumar Arya: Supervision, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. Balasubramani Ravindran: Supervision,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea by the Korean Government (MSIT) (2020R1G1A1012069). This study was also supported by SDC, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India. Also, the funding supported from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (Grant no. B48G660116) and the Center of Excellence in Catalysis for Bioenergy and Renewable

References (101)

  • M.V. Rodionova et al.

    Biofuel production: Challenges and opportunities

    Int J Hydrogen Energy

    (2017)
  • Z. Hu et al.

    The catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae to produce syngas

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2014)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Recent advances of biofuels and biochemicals production from sustainable resources using co-cultivation systems

    Biotechnol Biofuels

    (2019)
  • Y. Wu et al.

    Bioenergy production and environmental impacts

    Geosci Lett

    (2018)
  • R. Travaini et al.

    Sugarcane bagasse ozonolysis pretreatment: Effect on enzymatic digestibility and inhibitory compound formation

    Bioresour Technol

    (2013)
  • A. Alam et al.

    Modeling of optimal green liquor pretreatment for enhanced biomass saccharification and delignification by distinct alteration of wall polymer features and biomass porosity in Miscanthus

    Renew Energy

    (2020)
  • H. Gao et al.

    Combined steam explosion and optimized green-liquor pretreatments are effective for complete saccharification to maximize bioethanol production by reducing lignocellulose recalcitrance in one-year-old bamboo

    Renew Energy

    (2021)
  • M. Hu et al.

    Distinct polymer extraction and cellulose DP reduction for complete cellulose hydrolysis under mild chemical pretreatments in sugarcane

    Carbohydr Polym

    (2018)
  • D. Kumar et al.

    Preparation and characterization of novel hybrid bio-support material immobilized from Pseudomonas cepacia lipase and its application to enhance biodiesel production

    Renew Energy

    (2020)
  • W. Xie et al.

    Immobilized lipase on magnetic chitosan microspheres for transesterification of soybean oil

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (2012)
  • W. Jin et al.

    Tween-80 is effective for enhancing steam-exploded biomass enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production by specifically lessening cellulase absorption with lignin in common reed

    Appl Energy

    (2016)
  • D. Sun et al.

    Distinct mechanisms of enzymatic saccharification and bioethanol conversion enhancement by three surfactants under steam explosion and mild chemical pretreatments in bioenergy Miscanthus

    Ind Crop Prod

    (2020)
  • M. Madadi et al.

    Using Amaranthus green proteins as universal biosurfactant and biosorbent for effective enzymatic degradation of diverse lignocellulose residues and efficient multiple trace metals remediation of farming lands

    J Hazard Mater

    (2021)
  • R. Sankaran et al.

    Recent advances in the pretreatment of microalgal and lignocellulosic biomass: A comprehensive review

    Bioresour Technol

    (2020)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Biofuels for a sustainable future

    Cell

    (2021)
  • Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I. B., Norskov, J. K., Jaramillo, T. F. (2017). Combining...
  • ...
  • U.S Department of Energy...
  • D. Singh et al.

    A review on feedstocks, production processes, and yield for differentgenerations of biodiesel

    Fuel

    (2019)
  • U.S. Department of Energy, Office of ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY...
  • United States Department of Labour Green Job Hazards - Biofuels | Occupational Safety and Health Administration...
  • W. Reid et al.

    The future of bioenergy

    Glob Chang Biol

    (2019)
  • International Energy Agency, 2018 Market report series: Renewables, https://webst...
  • N.A. Nudri et al.

    Characterisation of oil palm trunk biocoal and its suitability for solid fuel applications

    Biomass Convers Biorefinery

    (2020)
  • S. Venna et al.

    Landfill leachate as an alternative moisture source for hydrothermal carbonisation of municipal solid wastes to solid biofuels

    Bioresour Technol

    (2020)
  • K. Kurowska et al.

    Food Security in the Context of Liquid Biofuels Production

    Energies

    (2020)
  • P. Purohit et al.

    Lignocellulosic biofuels in India: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects AIMS

    Energy

    (2018)
  • OECD (2023) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2022-2031,...
  • Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas India -...
  • Government of Canada, Clean fuel regulation...
  • International Energy Agency...
  • Pattanaik, L., Pattnaik, F., Saxena, D.K., Naik, S.N. (2019) Biofuels from agricultural wastes. In: Second and Third...
  • Economic Survey (2022-23). Statistical appendix. Available...
  • Jung, S., Shetti, N.P., Reddy, K.R., Nadagouda, M. N., Park,Y.K., Aminabhavi, T.M., Kwon, E.E.(2021). Synthesis of...
  • K.B. Cantrell et al.

    Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities, Bioresource Technology, 99(17)

    ISSN

    (2008)
  • S. Behera et al.

    Scope of algae as third generation biofuels

    Front Bioeng Biotechnol

    (2015)
  • K. Nwosu-Obieogu et al.

    Utilization of agricultural waste for bioethanol production- A review

    Int J Cur Res Rev

    (2016)
  • T.W. Hertel et al.

    Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses

    Bioscience

    (2010)
  • T. Huang et al.

    Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in a double-cropping cereal rotation as affected by nitrogen and straw management

    Biogeosciences

    (2013)
  • S. Nanda et al.

    A Broad Introduction to First-, Second-, and Third-Generation Biofuels

  • Cited by (16)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text