Waste Management

Volume 29, Issue 3, March 2009, Pages 1163-1166
Waste Management

Municipal solid waste management in India: From waste disposal to recovery of resources?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.038Get rights and content

Abstract

Unlike that of western countries, the solid waste of Asian cities is often comprised of 70–80% organic matter, dirt and dust. Composting is considered to be the best option to deal with the waste generated. Composting helps reduce the waste transported to and disposed of in landfills. During the course of the research, the author learned that several developing countries established large-scale composting plants that eventually failed for various reasons. The main flaw that led to the unsuccessful establishment of the plants was the lack of application of simple scientific methods to select the material to be composted.

Landfills have also been widely unsuccessful in countries like India because the landfill sites have a very limited time frame of usage. The population of the developing countries is another factor that detrimentally impacts the function of landfill sites. As the population keeps increasing, the garbage quantity also increases, which, in turn, exhausts the landfill sites. Landfills are also becoming increasingly expensive because of the rising costs of construction and operation.

Incineration, which can greatly reduce the amount of incoming municipal solid waste, is the second most common method for disposal in developed countries. However, incinerator ash may contain hazardous materials including heavy metals and organic compounds such as dioxins, etc. Recycling plays a large role in solid waste management, especially in cities in developing countries.

None of the three methods mentioned here are free from problems. The aim of this study is thus to compare the three methods, keeping in mind the costs that would be incurred by the respective governments, and identify the most economical and best option possible to combat the waste disposal problem.

Introduction

Rapid population growth, urbanization and industrial growth have led to severe waste management problems in the cities of developing countries like India. The large quantity of waste generated necessitates a system of collection, transportation and disposal. It requires knowledge of what the wastes are comprised of, and how they need to be collected and disposed. Recycling of waste, energy generation and employment opportunities from waste management also have immense potential. However, it has been widely observed that the Municipal Corporations in India do not have adequate resources or the technical expertise necessary to deal with the problem. Successful waste management requires the participation of citizens, local governments, and private entrepreneurs.

The increase in the population and rapid income growth in India has changed the lifestyle of urban residents, thus changing the composition of the garbage generated. The presence of paper, plastic and metal is on the rise, resulting in more disposal difficulty. The municipalities have not been able to collect and dispose of the enormous quantity of waste being generated. Scavengers and rag pickers have helped the corporations with the collection of the garbage generated, since they collect it from households to garbage dumps and carry out the important function of waste segregation.

Waste management and disposal is a pressing issue facing India today, since about 90% of waste is currently disposed of by open dumping. Some commonly used methods by which the waste could be managed are: incineration, landfilling and composting. However, these methods are inefficient and harm the environment. This paper argues that the solution to waste management is not merely technical, but also organizational. There is a great need to move away from the disposal-centric approach and toward the recovery-centric approach of waste management. This paradigm shift requires some level of public participation by regulating and monitoring waste generation and disposal.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your institution

Section snippets

Incineration

Incineration refers to the combustion of waste materials that result in ash residue and air emissions. Waste incinerators do not eliminate waste – in fact they generate it. Since physical matter cannot be destroyed, an incinerator actually transforms the original waste materials into several new forms, including: air emissions, ash and liquid discharge (Department of Environment, 1995). These new forms are far more difficult to deal with than the original raw waste materials.

Landfilling

A landfill is an area of land onto or into which waste is deposited. The aim is to avoid any contact between the waste and the surrounding environment, particularly the groundwater. Landfills can be classified into three categories, which are:

  • i.

    Open dumps or open landfills, which are the most common in all developing countries, involve the refuse simply being dumped haphazardly into low lying areas of open land.

  • ii.

    Semi-controlled or operated landfills are designated sites where the dumped refuse is

Composting

Composting is the controlled decomposition of organic matter through biological processes, resulting in nutrient-rich humus. The word ‘compost’ is derived from the Latin verb ‘componere’, which means to put together. Composting involves the putting together of a mixture of vegetable residue, animal matter, soil and water to form humus. The amount of compostable material in the waste of developing countries is 80–85%. The typical composition of municipal solid waste in India is given in Table 1.

Conclusion

In a world limited by resources, recovery is fundamental to sustainable development. The world has become aware of that need. A recovery-centric approach to municipal solid waste management cannot be functional, however, without active citizen participation and proper implementation of regulations. Small experiments have shown that it is possible to achieve a recovery-centric approach by altering citizen behaviour. Based upon the results of this paper, it is very clear that composting after

References (19)

  • Committee on Health Effects of Waste Incineration, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life...
  • P. Connett et al.

    Municipal waste incineration – wrong question, wrong answer

    The Ecologist

    (1994)
  • P. Davis

    Report on Municipal Waste Incineration

    (1994)
  • R.A. Denison et al.

    Anti-recycling myths

  • Department of the Environment/WO

    Making waste work: a strategy for sustainable waste management in England and Whales

    (1995)
  • N. Dulac

    The organic waste flow in integrated sustainable waste management

  • G.J. Farquhar

    Leachate: production and characterisation

    Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

    (1989)
  • Franklin Associates, 1994. The role of recycling in integrated solid waste management to the year 2000. Report for Keep...
  • A. Howard

    Agricultural Testament

    (1943)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (234)

  • An SDBD plasma-based source for efficient degradation of VOCs in an enclosed environment

    2023, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text