Genmab: A Complicated Tale

May 01, 2024 10:27 AM ETGenmab A/S (GMAB) StockBNTX, RHHBY1 Comment

Summary

  • Genmab's stock has lost over 35% of its value since December 2022 due to unfavorable arbitration cases and high spending on launching Epkinly.
  • The company's top line is currently dominated by royalties from Darzalex, but it hopes Epkinly will contribute significantly to its revenue.
  • Genmab has a strong pipeline with eight revenue-generating medications, nine clinical programs, and nine royalty candidates in Phase 2 or later trials.
  • The company also recently made an acquisition to bolster its pipeline with some ADC candidates.
  • A full investment analysis around Genmab A/S stock is presented in the paragraphs below.
  • Looking for a helping hand in the market? Members of The Biotech Forum get exclusive ideas and guidance to navigate any climate. Learn More »

koto_feja/E+ via Getty Images

Shares of Danish antibody concern Genmab A/S (GMAB) have lost over 35% of their value since December 2022, as three arbitration cases went against it while it was spending substantially to launch Epkinly. The hope is for Epkinly to

Live Chat on The Biotech Forum has been dominated by discussion of lucrative buy-write or covered call opportunities on selected biotech stocks over the past several months. To see what I and the other season biotech investors are targeting as trading ideas real-time, just join our community at The Biotech Forum by clicking HERE.

This article was written by

Bret Jensen profile picture
Bret Jensen
49.79K Followers

Bret Jensen has over 13 years as a market analyst, helping investors find big winners in the biotech sector. Bret specializes in high beta sectors with potentially large investor returns.

Bret leads the investing group The Biotech Forum, in which he and his team offer a model portfolio with their favorite 12-20 high upside biotech stocks, live chat to discuss trade ideas, and weekly research and option trades. The group also provides market commentary and a portfolio update every weekend. Learn More.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Comments (1)

Sort by
Vikdan profile picture
Vikdan
01 May 2024, 11:30 AM
So, there is a lot more to the Genmab story than you provide here. You fail to analyze and discuss HexaBody-CD38 (or just CD38) which is likely to be Darzalex's successor. Janssen has an opt-in and this will be settled at the end of 2024/Q1 2025. This aspect is likely far more important than Epkinly in terms of moving back to Genmab's ATH.

I will add that Genmab is flush with cash, and has plenty of money to support/expand its clinical programmes and do a few more buy-outs if so desired. What stings me is the amount of stock options that management etc. receive on the back of a stuck stock price.

At the current stock price, Genmab could likely sell the Darzalex to Janssen and recoup every penny. I.e. you are getting the whole pipeline for free at the moment.
Genmab has done a good job at "branching out" out as to (likely) avoid a buy-out. This could, of course, be attributing to dragging its stock price as a buy-out is complicated with these different royalty etc. deals in place.

A comparable buy out would be Seagen though. Personally, I would have liked to see a sale of Darzalex to Janssen and possibly the sale of 1-3 of its royalty deals to their respective partners. Then they split out the rest of the company in similar fashion to the Biohaven deal.
This would have maximized shareholder value in my eyes. However, with CD38 being less than 1 year away, there is no point now. As it should propel the stock price near ATH assuming it's a good outcome.

Thanks for writing.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!