Spire Global: Strong Buy Once The Financing Closes

Mar. 24, 2024 5:25 AM ETSpire Global, Inc. (SPIR) Stock41 Comments
Edward Vranic, CFA profile picture
Edward Vranic, CFA
6.12K Followers

Summary

  • Spire Global, Inc. has experienced a significant increase in its stock price, similar to other AI companies, and is currently at a discount after a recent financing announcement.
  • The financing round will raise approximately $30 million immediately and includes warrants that expire in July 2024, suggesting confidence in the company's future performance.
  • If the company uses the majority of the funds to pay down debt, it will have a positive impact on its financials and improve its balance sheet.

Andreus

When one thinks of a small cap company that delves into the space, data and AI sectors, profits are generally not something that comes to mind. An exception to that rule may be Spire Global, Inc. (NYSE:SPIR). The stock

This article was written by

Edward Vranic, CFA profile picture
Edward Vranic, CFA
6.12K Followers
I am a private investor based out of Toronto, Canada and I have been investing since 2003. After 8 years in Corporate Finance with a Canadian Telecom company I have decided to dedicate myself full-time to the capital markets. I write on Seeking Alpha to demonstrate my financial analysis and writing skills across a variety of industries and to take advantage of any story-based trading opportunity that may arise. My passion and greatest depth of knowledge is on Canadian small cap stocks and I consider my blog posts to be some of my best work. I am interested in any freelance opportunities that may arise outside of Seeking Alpha on Canadian or American listed stocks.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of SPIR either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Comments (41)

Sort by
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
I'm wondering why not a single of my fellow investors asked as to why this so called smart money invested at 14$/ share when they could have just waited a few weeks to buy a significant stake for 40% less ... but actually, it's always the same .... if there were a thematic "inverse smart money capital raise" ETF I already could retire ... and that again was so easy to predict ... it's ludicrous ... this cheap money period still prevails (at least for investment funds) ...
jsiebel720 profile picture
jsiebel720
25 Apr. 2024, 6:53 PM
@Barbell Investment Ideas because the economic structure of this country is run by Jay Powell, which is why we’re in the shape we’re in. ‘Nuff said.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
told you 3 weeks ago it's a HOLD for the time being ... and I feel no joy in saying that as it's a significant position and a real underperformer in my portfolio ... but yeah, mgmt doesn't deserve better ... also these institutional investors who bought a significant stake on the Nvidia news ... it speaks volumes as to how professional money managers do business these days ... everyone knew that the price was gonna crash hard on this development ... if mgmt were smart they would disclose that they sold probably (as per my estimate) 0.5 - 1.0 million shares between $17-19 via their ATM program ... but we will have to wait till next earnings release to see what they actually have done
jsiebel720 profile picture
jsiebel720
15 Apr. 2024, 7:32 PM
@Barbell Investment Ideas Oh God. Don't pat yourself on the back here. The entire NASDAQ is getting killed due to Bidenflation & sharply higher interest rates, not anything fundamentally wrong with SPIR business model. As 2024 moves on, if the company hits on their guidance, they will outperform.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@jsiebel720 lolololol ... I was again spot on here but not looking for a thank you from you guys (or maybe I was "lucky" because of "Bideninflation" as you would phrase it) ... it's just an underperforming stock compared to any small-cap subset you can put together ... over almost any possible past time horizon ... with one exception: you bought at the ATL which came in at c. 95% below their IPO price .... and referring here to the Nasdaq development ;) ... does it have a beta of 10??? but yeah, mgmt is great here, of course
D
@Barbell Investment Ideas i would like to know what stocks are you holding that have the potential of 3x at least.looks like you wrote an article saying strong buy, and now you take the chance to push down the stock every time you can, looks like you wrote it down to get out of the pos asap
jsiebel720 profile picture
jsiebel720
27 Mar. 2024, 11:59 AM
Now that the 1:8 reverse split & the "blindsided dilution" has sunk in, reading all the posts on all the recent articles published, ( especially posters who have been burned by SPAC entry into the market ), everyone needs to remember 2 cardinal rules; 1) DYODD 2) It's just as important when to buy as to what to buy. Case in point, GRRR. Bought some low, bought some too high, but I know what I own, & will take my chances. Given the AI froth out there, need to focus on fundamentals, business model & prospects, & path to profitability. Also remember, CFO @ SPIR is relatively new. It appears that he is making the elimination of Blue Torch debt a priority, which is fine by me. The sooner that overhang is eliminated, the better we'll all be. & this dilution will become a distant memory by the end of next year.,
SkylineView profile picture
SkylineView
27 Mar. 2024, 2:29 PM
@jsiebel720 "The sooner that overhang is eliminated, the better we'll all be."

After thinking about the $30M liquidity covenant, I realized they have a high interest $118M loan of which they can only properly use $88M, so the effective interest rate is even higher.
H
HE-King-Alpha
25 Mar. 2024, 10:38 PM
In their last CC they said they'd focus the cash on acquiring revenue, because they think the math really work in their favor (high revenue/low revenue acquisition cost):

"We described also the lifetime value to cost of acquiring a customer. And that's effectively where we think the biggest return would be for the shareholders at this point, because we have very, very strong returns on those investments on the acquisition side."
G
Germax
26 Mar. 2024, 5:15 PM
@HE-King-Alpha the complete picture comes with this statement from the CC: „It remains our objective to refinance our current loan in the second half of 2024 or very early 2025 at the latest.“
beach_trader profile picture
beach_trader
25 Mar. 2024, 10:45 AM
This is a fast growing software (guided to 35%) company in a sector not hugely correlated to the Nasdaq, with big potential market, which will make it very attractive to small cap funds. So now it trades around 2.5 x sales, with the dilution. In 6 months, nobody will care what the CFO does - they either have terrible debt, or issue equity - whatever. As long as they have plenty of cash to operate and grow I don't care. This is the problem with a busted SPAC that burned through a lot of cash - have to take companies as you find them. If it didn't have these issues and had IPOd in last year, it would be trading at 6-8 sales.
LikesToLearn profile picture
LikesToLearn
24 Mar. 2024, 8:01 PM
Keep in mind that reverse split adjusted they IPO'd at $80 and quickly burned through all their SPAC cash. As you said getting the Blue Torch loan was desperation as the terms are toxic. The current raise is good for Blue Torch (they will get a lot of their money back, with a nice profit) and good for management (first step away from the edge of the abyss) and increases the chance they will be able to refinance with conventional debt (which management has stated they want to do once the company qualifies). Is it good for individual investors? Remains to be seen. I don't see any good reason for new shareholders to be opening positions in this stock. There are much better choices out there. Why mess around with this one?
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@LikesToLearn you should busy yorself a bit with the company ... they didn't burn through all their SPAC cash ... they raised the debt to acquire a company for $130m ... but why bother with facts, right ...

but I agree the stock is a HOLD right now
LikesToLearn profile picture
LikesToLearn
26 Mar. 2024, 7:12 PM
@Barbell Investment Ideas Here are the facts. The first thing they did after their SPAC merger was to purchase Exact Earth for $161 million in cash and stock. It was only a month after going public. They then proceeded to blow through all their remaining SPAC cash, and their credit line, and then refinanced their $71 million credit line with the Blue Torch $120 million credit line (at horrible terms).
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@LikesToLearn ok, boy, just to get the facts straight here ... one needs to look at the closing date in case of a stock transaction lol:

"The final consideration was 165.8m CAD ($130m), which consists of 137.5m CAD paid in cash and 28.3m CAD paid in common shares via issuance of 5,230,167 shares valued Spire's closing price of $4.27 on completion (29 Nov 2021)"

so in plain English: cash cons (c. $108m) + stock cons (c. $22m) = total cons (c. $130m) -> equity value (enterprise value is a bit lower)

and yes, obviously, this cash consideration had to be refinanced, which they did a couple of months later with the Blue Torch loan (it goes without saying that the original SPAC cash amount was not intended to be used for such an acquisition)
p
patientbull1
24 Mar. 2024, 2:18 PM
‘Once it pays off that loan, it can refinance debt at a good rate and then use the proceeds to buy back stock.’

Most of the article makes sense to me but I I find it difficult to understand above statement.

You believe stock will be significantly higher than 14 in the near future.

But, also believe that SPIR can borrow again (may be at 10% instead of current 14%) to buyback shares at say 50% higher than current price. In that case to buy back what they are selling now their debt will go 50% higher than the current debtload! (actually market makers / HF / traders will front run stock way higher if they knew that $4 million shares are going to be bought back).

Even traditional lenders (if they entertain such hilarious move at all) will put strict covenants if this emerging growth company who has just turned FCF positive and GAAP loss making proposes to raise more debt than before to buy back own shares at a significantly higher prices than they sold few months back to pay off debt!

This doesn’t appear plausible.

Management will likely run for their life at the name of the debt from now on. Management itself has effectively lost 45% of their holdings due to debt.

And honestly after all this, if they even remotely mentioned debt again, market and most shareholders will puuke all over it.

With all due respect, current dilution is permanent and can’t be undone for all the practical purposes.
Edward Vranic, CFA profile picture
@patientbull1 I don't know what to tell you other than to look at other companies that buy back shares. Certainly at some point of time before they were profitable, they also diluted. Dilution is not permanent and can be undone. Albeit, likely at prices higher than they initial dilution. But that implies the stock price went up, which is what we all want.
p
patientbull1
24 Mar. 2024, 3:23 PM
@Edward Vranic, CFA

Theoretically yes but that’s why I wrote for all the practical purposes.

Who knows what happens after 5 years when no one anticipated what transpired in the last year.

Mature companies swimming in cash above and beyond their reinvestment needs buy back stocks.

SPIR which as per their last earnings call, very much eager and rightly so to ramp up sales and marketing costs as the first use of their free cash flow is not likely to have enough free cash to buy back meaningful shares in the near future to reverse what they have diluted in the last year.

And, no debt please for buy backs. (again this for SPIR and not meant for Apple or some other giants who can borrow at less than their dividend yield).

Anyways, thanks for the good article. Best wishes.
p
pol mesnil
24 Mar. 2024, 12:49 PM
With "IF", you can put PARIS in a bottle..and the share price at 20...
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
unfortunately, management can't be trusted here anymore ...
I can't see the/ a good part of this offering ... they sold 10% of their shares for a price of about 13$/share (taking into account the value of the warrants valued at 1$ as per my estimate)
long-term investors can only hope that these warrants expire worthless, ie the price must not cross the 14.50$ threshold within the next 100 days ... upside would be even more capped by this additional dilution and Canaccord would lower the TP by another dollar (ceteris paribus as it's just math ... the additional proceeds will be used to pay down debt and not to provide for more future growth) ...look at their sales expenses ... it's a ridiculously high number given the number of customers they are targeting ... but it's getting better since Blue Torch got a seat at the table ... I love their influence on company's decisions ... but I don't love their interest receipts ;) and a last word re capital allocation: management significantly overpaid for exactEarth at an equity value of $131m (approx. 7x EV/LTM revenue) ... in order to buy this slightly growing company back then it raised this Blue Torch debt of $120m ... at the time of the acquistion the stock was trading a couple of times higher than today ... only because of this capital allocation decision I had the opportunity to go all-in at levels between $3 and $5 ... it goes without saying they could have financed the deal back then with a capital raise at a share price of OVER $50/share ... that's where the stock was trading after the announced acquistion
Edward Vranic, CFA profile picture
@Barbell Investment Ideas it sounds like you have an axe to grind and are using your personal views on the management team to cloud your judgement. This deal is unambiguously good. It's true that good companies can hold debt on their books. The debt SPIR has on its books is trash. Basically toxic dilution (because it came with warrants) at near loan shark rates. The company accepted that at the time because it was desperate. It's no longer desperate so it should get rid of the debt ASAP.

If you actually read my article you'll see that EPS IMPROVES because the dilution from the issuance of shares is more than offset by interest payment savings. Once it pays off that loan, it can refinance debt at a good rate and then use the proceeds to buy back stock. Presumably at higher than $14.50 so technically a loss on the overall equity transactions but all shareholders gain, and the dilution is eventually undone. Everyone wins (except shorts and people who panic sold low).

Also you have it backwards. Hope that the SP stays below $14.50 so the warrants expire? No! The deal is almost certainly done this way because the investor thinks the SP will be well above $14.50 in the next three months. They profit from the in-the-money warrants and management can pay off even more debt just as the termination fee drops from 2% to 1% of principal paid.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@Edward Vranic, CFA a few points
1) I'm holding a very significant stake in this company with an average price of around $6 (and just because I kept accumulating shares the way up) ... a long-term investor
2) everything in the msg above is based on facts ... except for the first sentence to be precise
3) they took out the loan because they had to finance the (massively overvalued) $120m acquistion and NOT because they were desperate ... lol ... they had a full cash balance as a result of the SPAC transaction
4) the loan didn't come with warrants ... problem was they kept breaching their covenants, hence the issuance of warrants as remedy
5) why would I care what the investor thinks the stock price is at in 3 months from now??? I can only pray the stock price stays below $14.50 ... but rather unlikely, I agree ... I hope these warrants with a value of more than $1 as of today (as you rightly calculated) expire worthless ... if mgmt executes the share price will be above $20 in 6 months from now ... why not dilute at theses levels???
6) I'm pretty sure the dilution is higher than publicly known as they most likely used theri ATM offering on Tuesday/ Wednesday (which would be a comparatively good move at least)
jsiebel720 profile picture
jsiebel720
24 Mar. 2024, 9:53 AM
In the other recent SA articles published recently you refer to, I have tried to make the point that the issuance & dilution are definitely painful in the short term, the reduction of the Blue Torch debt more than outweighs the dilutive nature of the offering. The short 100 day exercise time frame of the warrants is a +. Also, Signal Ocean's investment @ $12 & NVDA interest inspire confidence. Did trade out of some of my position between $16 -$18, Bought back & Added to position from $15.30 down to <$12 ( coulda traded it better ), but did buy the bulk of additional shares < $12. I clearly stated that the stock price was overextended in the high teens, but is now a buy in the low teens. The risk / reward ratio is excellent here, & if it drops und $12 again Monday, I will add more to my already over weighted position.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@jsiebel720 probably a big coincidence that the traders who made money on the back of another management blunder are now celebrating mgmt's decisions and the firm overall ... but who would talk his book here lol
Edward Vranic, CFA profile picture
@jsiebel720 I saw this narrative pop up, and wanted to expand on this idea with the numbers I laid out in the article. If management uses the money to pay down the debt, it's anti-dilutive.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@Edward Vranic, CFA to be fair, it's only anti-dilutive in FY24 but highly dilutive from FY25 onwards (just math based on the leverage effect) if mgmt executes against its stated growth strategy
p
patientbull1
24 Mar. 2024, 6:30 AM
Very good article. thanks.

In the press release, they clearly indicated that proceeds would be used to pay down debt, for working capital and general corporate purposes. As they are positive for cash coming out from operation, I don't think they have any other use for the proceeds particularly as they have $50 million in cash equivalent currently sitting in the balance sheet.

I personally think and hope that they would have sold 1-2 million shares using ATM Facility in $ 17-19 range.

They can use $58 million from direct offering after fees reducing outstanding debt to $57 million. They can use ATM (either already done or could be done in future) raising say approx $27 million + use $30 million (out of $50 million cash sitting in the balance sheet) and get rid of debt altogether. They will no longer need to worry about minimal $30 million of cash (related to debt covenant) if they pay off debt entirely.

Once they are cash flow positive + no longer paying nearly $17 million of net interest a year, they no longer need to hold more than say $20-25 million of cash.

In this case total dilution would be around 20% direct offering + 5% signal + 5% in warrants to Blue torch + ~7% in ATM. If we add 10% dilution last year - company gave away at least 45% of current shareholders' rights forever to pay off debt - this was self inflicting.

However, once that is behind, agree that shares are still very undervalued and hopefully market will see SPIR in the new light as deep tech, debt free, cash flow positive and hopefully GAAP profitable in couple of years.

Only concern will remain is management's judgement (can't blame on previous CFO who did not hold that many shares, largest holder CEO himself has wall street experience and comes across as very smart and financially well aware but pulled some surprising negative moves).

As a long term shareholder, I can only wish that they have learnt something from this debacle.

Long SPIR for long term.
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@patientbull1 almost every well-run company carries a significant amount debt (maybe apart from today's cash-gushing tech titans) ... Corporate Finance 101
SkylineView profile picture
SkylineView
24 Mar. 2024, 10:38 AM
@Barbell Investment Ideas yes, but do well-run companies find their financing through Urgent Capital LLC?

... “we paid Urgent Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, a fee for introducing us to the Lenders, for the purpose of loan financing, in the amount equal to $0.6 million in cash”…
Barbell Investment Ideas profile picture
@SkylineView no and I criticized mgmt for this sort of financing in my article 6 months ago ... but nowadays, everyone (except for me) seems to love Spire's mgmt ... interesting turn
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!