Spire Global: An AI Buy Story, But In Space

Jun. 14, 2024 4:59 AM ETSpire Global, Inc. (SPIR) Stock8 Comments
Joseph Parrish profile picture
Joseph Parrish
1.3K Followers

Summary

  • Spire Global offers an opportunity to invest in space and AI simultaneously, with potential for positive cash flows in the near future.
  • The company's business model revolves around a large satellite fleet providing data solutions in areas like maritime travel, aviation, and weather, with a focus on maximizing sales.
  • Despite short-term uncertainties and risks like non-insured space assets and debt, SPIR's integration of generative AI with satellite data positions it well for significant growth potential.

EvgeniyShkolenko

Spire Global (NYSE:SPIR) is an opportunity to bet on space and AI at the same time. Early in its life as a public company, one might think the stock is one to avoid.

Currently, the

This article was written by

Joseph Parrish profile picture
Joseph Parrish
1.3K Followers
My articles are written with a mind to owning a stock for years, not trying to predict price movements in a few months. I don't do target prices; I do valuations.I first entered investing in 2020 as an individual value investor, keen to understand the fundamentals of businesses and buy their shares at attractive prices. From May 2022 to May 2023, I worked as an investment advisory representative at Fidelity Investments. I am now self-employed through other ventures.Part of my technique is to write an article as though it is a letter to my future self. I look at it as a chance for my ideas to improve and grow as I follow each company. As such, I tend to start from a place of caution. I used to write many Sell pieces. As of March 2024, I stopped doing that, and I simplified my approach to "Buy or Don't Buy." Many of my articles will either be Buy or Hold going forward. I have yet to issue a Strong Buy rating to any security.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Comments (8)

Sort by
jason.baksted profile picture
Nice analysis and valuation. I am not an insurance expert so I have to ask, would it make sense to insure 170 satellites that cost in low 6 figures, which has an expected lifetime of <8yrs? The benefit of a LEO constellation is as sats naturally deorbit, they can be replaced by an upgraded mode. Perhaps insurance could be useful for the entirety of the constellation but agree that such a policy does not exist...and if some event were to knock out an entire satellite constellation, well, we would all have much bigger things to worry about than stocks!
Only other small point of note, the current solar storm did not necessarily delay space services customers, it simply shortened the lifetime of some of spires existing assets. My understanding is we will see some higher front end capex spend on the space services as Spire spends up front to build and launch the customer's sat but then makes it back via a subscription model once the asset is on orbit.
p
patientbull1
14 Jun. 2024, 10:59 AM
@jason.baksted

'as Spire spends up front to build and launch the customer's sat but then makes it back via a subscription model once the asset is on orbit.'

As far as I understand, SPIR recoup their space services customers' capex from customers at certain predefined milestones - so SPIR start building customers' satellites from its own fund and as it progresses, customers pay back that amount at regular interval.

So, SPIR does not make money at building stage. It does not invest for customers' capex either but just its working capital ties up at that stage until after launching when customer pays back full amount of capex. They make profit through data provision over the lifetime of the satellite.

I am sure new CFO would be trying to revert this process i.e. receives first instalment from customer before starting to build satellite and more instalments at pre-defined milestone achievements. That way, it would not have to tie up valuable cash in working capital receivables.
Joseph Parrish profile picture
Joseph Parrish
14 Jun. 2024, 11:36 AM
I think that's a good summary, Jason.
jason.baksted profile picture
@patientbull1 Yes, I think you have it correct, I was trying to give a very short answer as to why we're seeing space services capex tick up.
rt94103 profile picture
rt94103
14 Jun. 2024, 9:57 AM
Mulitbagger thesis could well be foiled by take private. Long none the less.
beach_trader profile picture
beach_trader
14 Jun. 2024, 9:12 AM
Good article, but your valuation models are just shot in the dark - not just yours, but everyone’s. A small change in one of the variables creates large change in value. I would stick to the metrics investors use, growth rate, gross margins and determine if price to sales or ARR is appropriate. everyone uses these shorthand metrics as a proxy for good reason
H
Hugh Arhue
14 Jun. 2024, 8:08 AM
Thank you author for your perspective on $SPIR.
p
patientbull1
14 Jun. 2024, 5:31 AM
Great technology but share price performance bought down by debt and balance sheet troubles.

www.thalesgroup.com/...

Above MOC shows it’s potential - a €50B company asking SPIR to make satellites for joint service provision with aspirations to eventually replace Air traffic management system in the next decade.

However, it also has same problems as before as all investments are front loaded and revenues only come after 3 years.

This now explains why management did utilise only $10 million out of 40 million raised in share sale to prepay debt and that too as lenders made them to do that due to yet another covenant breach.

Business is still in investment phase needing lots of capital and at same time trapped with shark loan causing them $20 million in yearly interest.

Only panacea appears to be controlled and at progressively higher price dilution as company becomes FCF positive in next quarter + refinance debt with less evil lender.

If for sale, this company would definitely go for much higher price in the private markets.
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!