First problem is that whomever made that video threw any chance of credibility out the window when they tried to open java bytecode in notepad++. Second problem is that there is no MCP for 1.8 so none of what is shown in the video with regards to jar contents is possible. The names are obfuscated. It's NOT in the class files.
Alright guys yes it's fake it's just a lighting problem with the endermen. I'm getting an endermen-herobrine thing started because this guy knew about the obfuscation tables although it's possible to be a sub-type of an endermen much like coloured sheep but there would not be a seperate entity with it.
"Wow, and you had me so convinced!" I said with sarcasm.
it's just a lighting problem with the endermen.
No, you edited the skin.
I'm getting an endermen-herobrine thing started because this guy knew about the obfuscation tables although it's possible to be a sub-type of an endermen much like coloured sheep but there would not be a seperate entity with it.
"knew about the obfuscation tables" is nonsense, because obfuscation doesn't involve a table, it involves the munging of name tables, but the original names are lost and you cannot outright "reverse" obfuscation, with or without dining room furniture. MCP is a group of folks who look at the obfuscated code and give meaningful names to the variables, methods, and classes.
secondly it's a "subclass" not a sub-type, and of course it's possible. making derived classes is nothing special. Also, coloured sheep are not sub-classes of sheep, they are instances of the same class but with a different "armour" on.
"Wow, and you had me so convinced!" I said with sarcasm.
No, you edited the skin.
"knew about the obfuscation tables" is nonsense, because obfuscation doesn't involve a table, it involves the munging of name tables, but the original names are lost and you cannot outright "reverse" obfuscation, with or without dining room furniture. MCP is a group of folks who look at the obfuscated code and give meaningful names to the variables, methods, and classes.
secondly it's a "subclass" not a sub-type, and of course it's possible. making derived classes is nothing special. Also, coloured sheep are not sub-classes of sheep, they are instances of the same class but with a different "armour" on.
Oh well thanks on correcting me so i don't make the same mistake of misinforming other people and yes it really was a lighting bug I had with one of the mods (GLSL Shaders) that i tried updating myself I'm a amatuer coder, i only said obfuscation tables because that's what comes up when I decompile :tongue.gif:
Is it real or is it fake? You Decide..
Video Credit goes to xNiggle (Me :tongue.gif:)
^ Don't forget to click this ^
But farlands do exsist.
^ Don't forget to click this ^
- View User Profile
- View Posts
- Send Message
Curse PremiumFirst problem is that whomever made that video threw any chance of credibility out the window when they tried to open java bytecode in notepad++. Second problem is that there is no MCP for 1.8 so none of what is shown in the video with regards to jar contents is possible. The names are obfuscated. It's NOT in the class files.
secondly:
Nothing was found.
Fake, although it was probably just a glitch with the enderman.
2nd: At the end, you wrote
Farlanders: True, or Real?
^ Don't forget to click this ^
Is that a fact, or are you assuming that?
- View User Profile
- View Posts
- Send Message
Curse Premium"Wow, and you had me so convinced!" I said with sarcasm.
No, you edited the skin.
"knew about the obfuscation tables" is nonsense, because obfuscation doesn't involve a table, it involves the munging of name tables, but the original names are lost and you cannot outright "reverse" obfuscation, with or without dining room furniture. MCP is a group of folks who look at the obfuscated code and give meaningful names to the variables, methods, and classes.
secondly it's a "subclass" not a sub-type, and of course it's possible. making derived classes is nothing special. Also, coloured sheep are not sub-classes of sheep, they are instances of the same class but with a different "armour" on.
Oh well thanks on correcting me so i don't make the same mistake of misinforming other people and yes it really was a lighting bug I had with one of the mods (GLSL Shaders) that i tried updating myself I'm a amatuer coder, i only said obfuscation tables because that's what comes up when I decompile :tongue.gif:
^ Don't forget to click this ^