Install Steam
login | language简体中文 (Simplified Chinese) 繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese) 日本語 (Japanese) 한국어 (Korean) ไทย (Thai) Български (Bulgarian) Čeština (Czech) Dansk (Danish) Deutsch (German) Español - España (Spanish - Spain) Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America) Ελληνικά (Greek) Français (French) Italiano (Italian) Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) Magyar (Hungarian) Nederlands (Dutch) Norsk (Norwegian) Polski (Polish) Português (Portuguese - Portugal) Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil) Română (Romanian) Русский (Russian) Suomi (Finnish) Svenska (Swedish) Türkçe (Turkish) Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese) Українська (Ukrainian) Report a translation problem
I am just simply stating the vulnerability of your argument, opinion, or remarks.
--
If you are questioning about me, my philosopy, or something like that.
Another persons which included you and me, can determine how this conversation shown below, was correct or not or something else.
(It's possible that I lacked composure at the time. looking back for now.)
https://web.archive.org/web/20240706023021/https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/comments/3273096003
I can say No. perhaps "for me".
> and you don't want them to answer you back?
No, and you have a serious misunderstanding. here's why.
--
Most people wouldn't to see unnecessary, pointless, useless, less-directional arguments like this at here. needs to considerate.
And being considerate of other users is the natural thing for a socially skilled person would do.
(I'm not sure actually I am skilled, though. for example, do you easily believe someone who says they are?, wouldn't say such because it sounds fraud for me.)
--
As I have continuously stated, the words you have sent so far are too messy, vague and indistinct. making it hard to answer.
So you are bothering against me, or perhaps you've been bothering against another person you ever met on the internet or IRL so far, with the possibility of you are doing intentionally.
(Not to bothering against another person is what socially-skilled persons do, right?)
--
Dealing a very arrogant, delusional, twisted deviant who thought he was the most superior in the world.
This person negatively labeling against other users' mods with oftenly vulnerable reasons, has a possibility of questionable for lacking theory or evidence.
And have been making "do not download" list on his profile so far.
(Some of the reasons he indicated are convincing, but he is still lacking of respectful attitude.)
--------
Thank you for using my stuff I ever made.
--
Sentences that may contain discriminatory, by a specific user, and my responses against it, have been archived and removed.
--
I'm apologizing to all users who have been experienced something uncomfortable by seeing the conversation.
I'm afraid for that I couldn't understand what you are trying to something to tell me because of a language barrier.
But this link shown below might be useful.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3273500768
So please don't worry and sorry for sending potentially misleading reply.
With that kind of guts and passion, creating a patch would be easy. like me in the past...
Probably I can make a video tutorial for someone like you...
Dislikes, then Fork It. that is normal event of occurring on the internet. I won't complain even If you do this...
But keeping it's attack slot set to just 1 target is still fair. Setting it to 2 might even things out but anymore than that would be overpowered. The attack should definitely be raised. Please! Think about it in a almost technical standpoint!
Hint: Great White Gorillos on everywhere.
Well, actually I am recognizing it's too ungodly weak for now.
maybe I will increase the damage dealt in the future or not.
Anyway, needs to be more tested at least.
But it's not an issue, thank you for making this mod.