‘How Can a Dalit Student Write So Beautifully, So Nicely?’ Caste-Based Stereotyping and Its Implications for Dalit Students in Higher Education
Abstract
This paper presents a social-psychological study of caste stereotyping in higher education in India. It is about the lives of dalit students and their experiences of navigating through educational spaces with the awareness of being targets of stereotyping associated with their caste identity in the academic domain. With the help of in-depth interviews, the study delves into how dalit students respond to negative caste stereotyping, and what facilitates these responses. Fourteen dalit students (male = 8, female = 6) studying at two central universities in Delhi (India) participated in the study. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The analysis helped develop the following two themes: (1) The pervasiveness of caste stereotyping in the academic domain: ‘How can their handwriting be so good?’, (2) Institutional climate shapes responses to stereotyping: ‘this is not a personal issue, it is an entire group’s issue’. The analysis shows dalit students’ active efforts to navigate the negative caste stereotyping in educational contexts. Specifically, the analysis highlights the role of institutional climate in shaping these responses and transforming vulnerability (because of caste-based stereotyping and stigma) to empowerment and assertion. While the passivity and subordination of stigmatised groups such as dalits are taken for granted, this research demonstrates that given a conducive social environment such as a supportive institutional climate, dalit students’ experience of higher education may be positively impacted. The role of institutional climate in the empowerment of disadvantaged group identity and elements that promote such a climate are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aronson J., Lustina M. J., Good C., Keough K., Steele C. M., & Brown J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 29–46.
Augoustinos M., & Walker I. (1998). The construction of stereotypes within social psychology: From social cognition to ideology. Theory & Psychology, 8(5), 629–652.
Augoustinos M., Walker I., & Donaghue N. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Sage.
Balagopalan S., & Subrahmanian R. (2003). Dalit and Adivasi children in schools: Some preliminary research findings. IDS Bulletin, 34(1), 55–62.
Barreto M., & Ellemers N. (2010). Current issues in the study of social stigma: Some controversies and unresolved issues. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 431–445.
Branscombe N. R., Schmitt M. T., & Harvey R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135–149.
Braun V., & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Braun V., & Clarke V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
Braun V., & Clarke V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Browne K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47–60.
Crenshaw K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1249.
Creswell J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
de Lemus S., Bukowski M., Spears R., & Telga M. (2015). Reactance to (or acceptance of) stereotypes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(4), 236–246.
de Lemus S., Spears R., van Breen J. A., & Telga M. (2017). Coping with identity threats to group agency as well as group value. In Bukowski M., Fritsche I., Guinote A., & Kofta M. (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 151–170). Routledge.
Deshpande A. (2000). Does caste still define disparity? A look at inequality in Kerala, India. American Economic Review, 90(2), 322–325.
Deshpande A. (Ed.).(2013). Affirmative action in India. Oxford University Press.
Deshpande M. S. (2010). History of the Indian caste system and its impact on India today. California University Press.
Deshpande S. (2006). Exclusive inequalities: Merit, caste and discrimination in Indian higher education today. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(24), 2438–2444.
Devine P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.
Dunham Y., Srinivasan M., Dotsch R., & Barner D. (2014). Religion insulates ingroup evaluations: The development of intergroup attitudes in India. Developmental Science, 17(2), 311–319.
Ellemers N., & Barreto M. (2015). Modern discrimination: How perpetrators and targets interactively perpetuate social disadvantage. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.001
Fiske S. T., & Taylor S. E. (1991). Social cognition. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Fritsche I., Jonas E., Ablasser C., Beyer M., Kuban J., Manger A. M., & Schultz M. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(1), 19–32.
Guru G. (2001). The interface between Ambedkar and the Dalit cultural movement in Maharashtra. Dalit Identity and Dalit Politics: Cultural Subordination and the Dalit Challenge, 2, 160–94.
Giroux H. A. (2022). Pedagogy of resistance: Against manufactured ignorance. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Haslam S. A., & Reicher S. D. (2012). Contesting the “nature” of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s studies really show. PLoS Biology, 10(11), e1001426.
Hoff K., & Pandey P. (2006). Discrimination, social identity, and durable inequalities. American Economic Review, 96(2), 206–211.
Hoff K., & Pandey P. (2014). Making up people: The effect of identity on performance in a modernizing society. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.08.009
Inzlicht M., & Good C. (2006). How environments can threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. In Levin S., van Laar C. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 129–150). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Israel J., & Tajfel H. (1972). The context of social psychology. Academic Press.
Jaspal R. (2011). Caste, social stigma and identity processes. Psychology and Developing Societies, 23(2), 27–62.
Jogdand Y. (2023). Ground down and locked in a paperweight: Toward a critical psychology of caste based humiliation. Critical Philosophy of Race, 11(1), 33–67.
Jogdand Y., Khan S. S., & Mishra A. K. (2016). Understanding the persistence of caste: A commentary on Cotterill, Sidanius, Bhardwaj and Kumar (2014). Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 554–570.
Kaiser C. R., & Wilkins C. L. (2010). Group identification and prejudice: Theoretical and empirical advances and implications. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 461–476.
Klandermans B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell Publishing.
Klandermans P. G. (2014). Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology, 35(1), 1–22.
Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
Leach C. W., & Livingstone A. G. (2015). Contesting the meaning of intergroup disadvantage: Towards a psychology of resistance. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 614–632.
Leach C. W., Mosquera P. M. R., Vliek M. L., & Hirt E. (2010). Group devaluation and group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 535–552.
Leyens J. P., Yzerbyt V., & Schadron G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. Sage.
Major B., Spencer S., Schmader T., Wolfe C., & Crocker J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(1), 34–50.
Martelli J. T., & Parkar K. (2018). Diversity, democracy, and dissent: A study on student politics in JNU. Economic and Political Weekly, 53(11), 1–30.
McGarty C., Spears R., & Yzerbyt V. Y. (2002). Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. Cambridge University Press.
MHRD. (2019). All India Survey on Higher Education 2018–19. Department of Higher Education, Government of India.
Morse J. M. (Ed.). (1994). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Sage.
Nambissan G. (2006). Dalits and the rights to education. In Kumar R. (Ed.), The crisis of elementary education in India (pp. 224–265). Sage Publications.
Nambissan G. B. (2002). Equity in education? The schooling of Dalit children in India. In Shah G. (Ed.), Dalits and the state (pp. 79–128). Concept Publishing.
Newheiser A. K., & Barreto M. (2014). Hidden costs of hiding stigma: Ironic interpersonal consequences of concealing a stigmatized identity in social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.002
Noy C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.
Ovichegan S. K. (2015). Faces of discrimination in higher education in India: Quota policy, social justice and the Dalits. Routledge.
Rao S. S. (2013). Structural exclusion in everyday institutional life: Labelling of stigmatised groups in an IIT. In Nambissan G., Rao S. S. (Eds.), Sociology of education in India: Changing contours and emerging concerns (pp. 199–223). Oxford University Press.
Reicher S. (2011). Psychology, domination and resistance. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 204–217.
Sawariya M. (2021). Caste and counselling psychology in India. CASTE: A Global Journal on Social Exclusion, 2(1), 189–201.
Simon B. (2011). Collective identity and political engagement. In Azzi A., Chryssochoou X., Klandermans B., & Simon B. (Eds.), Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 137–157). Wiley-Blackwell.
Simon B., & Klandermans B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.
Smith B. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(1), 137–149.
Steele C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
Subašić E., Reynolds K. J., Reicher S. D., & Klandermans B. (2012). Where to from here for the psychology of social change? Future directions for theory and practice. Political Psychology, 33(1), 61–74.
Tajfel H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In Israel J., & Tajfel H. (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69–119). Academic Press.
Tajfel H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel H., & Turner J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin W. G., & Worchel S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel H., & Turner J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Worchel S., & Austin W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson Hall.
Thorat S., & Neuman K. S. (Eds.). (2012). Blocked by caste, economic discrimination in modern India. Oxford University Press.
Valmiki O. (2003). Joothan: A Dalit’s life. Columbia University Press.
van Laar C., Levin S. (Eds.). (2006). The experience of stigma: Individual, interpersonal, and situational influences. In Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 1–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Willig C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press.
Wright S. C., Taylor D. M., & Moghaddam F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003.
Zhang B., Hu Y., Zhao F., Wen F., Dang J., & Zawisza M. (2023). Editorial: The psychological process of stereotyping: Content, forming, internalizing, mechanisms, effects, and interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1117901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1117901
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 8, 2024
Issue published: June 2024
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Social Inclusion Studies.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 65
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 0
There are no citing articles to show.
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
Get access
Get access
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
Access journal content via a university, library or employer subscription.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
