Internet confuses people over US military draft change... here is the truth

Some in Congress have proposed reforming America’s rarely-used conscription system – but the changes are far from a done deal

Io Dodds
2Comments
A US Army infantryman assigned to Foxtrot Company ‘Pathfinders’ 2nd Assault Helicopter Battalion, 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, looks through his sights during M4 rifle reflexive fire range training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
A US Army infantryman assigned to Foxtrot Company ‘Pathfinders’ 2nd Assault Helicopter Battalion, 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, looks through his sights during M4 rifle reflexive fire range training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina (Photo by Capt. Adan Cazarez)

Congress has not voted to make US women eligible for conscription, and nor has it resolved to automatically enroll all young American men into the military draft database – at least, not yet.

Numerous excitable posts on TikTok, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter) in the last month have claimed that sweeping reforms to the USA’s rarely-used draft system are underway.

Some focused on a bill passed by the US House of Representatives that would enroll young men automatically instead of requiring them to fill out paperwork, while others pointed to a US Senate proposal to enroll women as well.

But neither of these proposals is a done deal, and neither provides any evidence that the US is secretly preparing to draft Americans to fight in Ukraine or some other planned future war, as some online commenters alleged.

Last Friday the Republican-controlled House passed a new version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) allowing the US government to automatically pull records from other federal databases to enroll men aged 18 through 25 into the draft system.

Men of that age are already legally required to enroll in the draft system in case they are ever called up, on pain of criminal penalties. The new law would make it harder for them to refuse or avoid doing so.

However, this new version of the NDAA also includes controversial partisan provisions such as restricting abortion or transgender healthcare for military personnel and their families, meaning it is unlikely to be passed by the Senate.

US Marines with Combat Logistics Battalion 26, 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, 2nd Marine Logistics Group
US Marines with Combat Logistics Battalion 26, 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, 2nd Marine Logistics Group (Photo by Lance Cpl. Emily Hazelbaker)

One narrowly failed amendment even required the restoral of a Confederate monument in Arlington National Cemetary depicting a stereotypical black “mammy”, which was taken down in December.

Meanwhile, the Senate Armed Forces Committee has introduced its own version of the NDAA which would make women eligible for the draft.

Groundbreaking as that would be, it's also something that the Senate has repeatedly proposed over the past few years without ever managing to get it passed by both chambers of Congress.

Many social media posts conflated these two proposals or misstate their details, sometimes making conspiratorial claims about their significance.

"If the Biden regime think American citizens are going to comply with a draft and fight in Ukraine, they are mistaken," said one post on X.

"The majority of us would rather die fighting the US government, than die in a trench in Ukraine, fighting a rich man’s war. That’s not a threat. It’s a promise."

Another user on TikTok falsely claimed: "As of today, you don't need to worry about registering for the military draft. No! The government is gonna do that for you automatically...

"My main question is, why would Congress need to pass such a law right now...? We're not even at war. Right?"

The US has not used military conscription since the Vietnam War when it became a flashpoint for anti-war and anti-imperialist protests.

It was most famously used during the Second World War when more than 10 million men were drafted into the military between 1940 and 1946.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

2Comments

Conversation

|

All Comments

    1. Comment by 1Eloise.

      "My main question is, why would Congress need to pass such a law right now...? We're not even at war. Right?"

      A. Because waiting until we need it to pass this would be stupid. Will take years to pass and implement.

      B. It's a sneaky way to draft people so they can't get an abortion (not because of any military need), if the Republican version were to pass.

      C. It's only setting up the legal framework for the draft, not starting to draft anyone. There should be no change to the process, except to stop draft dodgers who today fail their legal obligation to manually register.

      • Reply by Facts Matter.

        It couldn't be F. The realization that their equipment no longer gives them a steep edge, their 'superpower' status doesn't allow them to enforce the 'isolation' they proclaim is a handicap for the other side, and their 'soft power' fist isn't as heavy as lead anymore, so the 'iron glove' around that fist needs a lot of beefing up.

    Thank you for registering

    Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in