CURRENT PRICES END MAY 12

Outside Festival feat. Thundercat and Fleet Foxes.

FROM JUST $44

CURRENT PRICES END MAY 12

Outside Festival feat. Thundercat and Fleet Foxes.

FROM JUST $44

Told at Last: Stories from Darjeeling’s High-Altitude Climbing Community

This painstakingly researched new book collects the forgotten histories of mountaineerings often-overlooked high-altitude workers

A black and white photograph taken by Frank Smythe in the Himalaya in 1933. It appears in the new book, Headstrap.
Photo: Frank Smythe collection

Heading out the door? Read this article on the new Outside+ app available now on iOS devices for members! Download the app.

Nandini Purandare and Deepa Balsavar’s important new book, Headstrap: Legends and Lore from the Climbing Sherpas of Darjeeling, tells stories from the often-overlooked Sherpa and Bhutia communities whose members have played a crucial role in high-altitude Himalayan climbing since the 19th century.

In addition to an introduction by the authors, the following excerpt contains three short profiles. The first of these tells the story of one Wangdi Norbu, who participated in expeditions to Kangchenjunga (1930), Kamet (1931), Everest (1933, 1936, and 1938) and Nanga Parbat (1934), only to lose his career (but not his life) in 1947 to a tragic, multi-stage mountain accident. 

The second tells the story of Lewa, a “highly sought-after porter and sardar” who earned a coveted tiger badge as a reward for his “amazing tenacity and endurance both as mountaineer and as leader” in the 1930s, only to be tossed aside when a Western booking agent arbitrarily decided he was too old.

The last story is about Phuchung, a 21st century climber who worked for three years as a salesman in Dubai before returning to Darjeeling, attending the Himalayan Mountaineering Institute, and heading into the mountains for work. His comments about modern mountaineering would sound familiar to Wangdi Norbu and Lewa:“People don’t climb alone,” he says. “They take Sherpas who usually look after their clients very well. … Unfortunately, after they come down, only the members’ names will be on the list of those who summited. Not the names of the Sherpas—that still happens.”

—the Editors

*

The following text is excerpted from Headstrap: Legends and Lore from the Climbing Sherpas of Darjeeling by Nandini Purandare and Deepa Balsavar (April 2024). Published by Mountaineers Books. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.

Section divider
A number of high-altitude climbers in training in the 1950s.
L to R Nawang Topgay, Gyalzen Mikchen, Ang Tharkay, Principal Nandu Jayal, Tenzing Norgay, Da Namgyal, Ang Temba, Nawang Gombu. 1954 (Photo: Himalayan Mountaineering Institute Collection)

The seeds of this project were planted in early 2012 in a remote area of Arunachal Pradesh in the eastern Himalaya. We were hiking with our old friend and trekking companion Harish Kapadia, modern India’s preeminent explorer. Travels with Harish are always filled with songs, stories, and anecdotes about the people he has met while traveling. He told us a fascinating story about the legendary climber Pasang Dawa Lama of Darjeeling—jumping naked into the icy waters of a Nepali river to advertise his having slept with one hundred women—that ignited our imagination about the community of Sherpa climbers in that hill town. We wanted to know more, and that’s how it all began.

At the end of our first visit to Darjeeling, in April 2012, we made a promise that this book seeks to fulfill: to record and share Sherpa stories and histories from this region. We uncovered many tales over the coming years, in the narrow, often grotty lanes of Toong Soong, a Sherpa settlement in Darjeeling. We found them in the warm homes of the sons and daughters of Sherpa heroes from decades ago. We traced connections and attempted to chart family trees. We discovered that there are new Sherpa climbers in Darjeeling today, but they are separated geographically, historically, and technologically from those who came almost a century ago. We dug into forgotten papers and books published by The Himalayan Club, set up in India in 1928 to encourage climbing and exploration in the Himalaya, and met with climbers all over the world who shared their memories with us.

Many of the Sherpas and other people we wanted to meet had died without anyone hearing about their remarkable lives. Over the years we returned to Darjeeling for months at a time to learn about these men and women. We kept at it, gaining confidence, making friends, and listening. The experience was both humbling and uplifting.

During the hours we spent in different homes, we realized and learned many things. We realized that memory is fallible. More importantly, our memories are not linear; they emerge from emotion, not logic, and not necessarily from fact. We occasionally came across discrepancies, either between how two people recalled the same event or between an oral recounting and a written one. For example, we interviewed Kusang Sherpa in 2013 about his arrival in Darjeeling and entry into climbing, but in his autobiography published a few years later, he recounts different details. In such cases, we have done our best to determine and recount those versions most likely to be accurate.

It took time to understand that it was the memories, personal and intimate, rather than the written accounts, that should be the focus of our work—after all, memories let us into people’s hearts and minds. Still, stories from memory are often left with gaps, which we worried about how to fill. It took time to understand that we could string together a narrative despite these imperfections, even as some facts have likely been lost along the way. We had to learn not to ask our interviewees questions that reflected our modern intellectual concerns and may be insensitive to our subjects’ conditions and priorities at the time, like “Did you ever think of doing something else to earn your living?” or “What did the women feel when their men left for the mountains?” Most of all, we learned that many Sherpas who appear in expedition accounts, both written and oral, were legendary climbers, but had no family or heirs to their stories left in Darjeeling. We are sincerely sorry that we could not cover them.

We recorded hundreds of hours of conversations, which had to be painstakingly transcribed. Narrators spoke in Nepali, Hindi, and English. The interviews were filled with hesitation, self-contradiction, doubt, and gossip. A single hour of recording took many hours to simultaneously translate and transcribe. It took a few years to record and subsequently transcribe all those conversations and interviews.

Interspersed with our trips to Darjeeling were our home lives in Mumbai, our day jobs, and our family obligations. We also took trips to other cities and towns to meet other people who knew these Sherpas and to visit libraries for research. In the early years, we were also constantly writing grant proposals and meeting with potential donors to the project. A travel agency, Cox & Kings, bought our airplane tickets for a few years, but we worked on a shoestring budget for everything else.

The hardest part came later when we had to sift through accounts, facts, dates, and names, and verify and organize them. Over 150 interviews, representing hundreds of hours, had to be condensed into a cohesive, readable, interesting narrative. Much had to be left out, in order to let the diamonds emerge.

Over the years, place names have changed. For instance, Bombay became Mumbai in 1995, and Calcutta became Kolkata in 2001. For consistency, we have gone with the more modern, Indian names for each place regardless of the timeline of the events being described, unless the reference appears in a direct quote.

A decade is a long time to write a book. Many of our narrators have died over this period. Still, we hope to keep their memories alive on the pages of this book—not an anthropological work or an academic tome but a tale about a fascinating community of mountain people and climbers. Finally, we take full responsibility for any oversights, factual inaccuracies, or misinterpretations.

Section divider

Wangdi Norbu 

The renowned porter Wangdi Norbu’s illustrious career encompassed many of the early-twentieth-century expeditions to the great Himalayan peaks: Kangchenjunga in 1930; Kamet in 1931; Fluted Peak in 1932; Everest in 1933, 1936, and 1938; Nanga Parbat in 1934; and several expeditions to the Garhwal and Assam. His porter book is filled with glowing testimonials from some of the biggest names of the time, like these two from the British climbers Frank Smythe and Hugh Ruttledge:

“Wangdi Nurbu accompanied the 1931 Kamet expedition. On this he did excellent work and carried to the highest camp at 23200 ft. He is a tremendous worker and thoroughly trustworthy in every way. He sets a splendid example by his tenacity of purpose under the most adverse circumstances.” —F. S. Smythe

“A real ‘stilt.’ Nearly died of pneumonia at the Base Camp, but turned up for work the moment he could. A hard case who will work splendidly for those who understand him, but he wants holding. Very strong.” —Hugh Ruttledge, Leader, Everest 1933

A photograph of five climbers in 1937—four of them are Sherpas.
Frank Smythe’s expedition to the Valley of Flowers, Garhwal, India in 1937. L to R Nurbu, Tewang, Frank Smythe, Wangdi Norbu, Pasang. (Photo: Frank Smythe collection)

In 1947, Norbu’s career was cut short at the peak of his prowess by a horrific accident on Kedarnath (6,940 meters) in India. It was the first post-war Swiss expedition to explore the southwest part of the Garhwal Himalaya, and Wangdi was the Sherpa sardar. He fell while approaching the summit and slipped down an icy slope, carrying his ropemate, Alfred Sutter, with him. Their fall was arrested when the slope eased off but Wangdi suffered a broken leg, a fractured skull, and a knee severely damaged by the point of a crampon. The other climbers were unable to bring him down that day, so they injected him with morphine and left him bivouacked on an ice bridge just inside a crevasse.

A collection of old Sherpa medals
Medals like these were distributed by the Himalayan Club and much valued by the Sherpa community. These belonged to Nawang Topgay. (Photo: The Sherpa Project collection)

A rescue team sent up the next day was unable to locate him. When the Swiss climber René Dittert along with the Sherpas Tenzing Norgay and Ang Norbu finally reached Wangdi a day later, they discovered a horrible sight. Thinking himself abandoned, in terrible pain, thirsty, and hungry, Wangdi had cut his own throat. There was blood everywhere, but he was alive. In an epic effort, the team first dragged then slid Wangdi down, and finally the Sherpas carried him to basecamp. Wangdi recovered from this accident but was never able to climb again.

Wangdi Norbu’s son Dawa Tsering recalled that a year or two later Andre Roch and other members of the expedition came to Darjeeling. They brought with them an expedition documentary made using footage filmed during the climb. Dawa remembered seeing the film at The Everest Hotel though its name escaped him. He did remember, however, that Roch gave his father a table clock and him some chocolates. Upon returning from other expeditions, Dawa Tsering told us, his father sometimes brought home good boots or a sleeping bag or leftover fruit. Other than food, everything else was soon sold because the family needed the money.

Dawa proudly showed us the relics left from his father’s career: a Tiger Badge, a porter book, a few letters, and a single photograph. When his father died, in 1952, Dawa was eleven. “After my father died, my mother burned everything. Even my father’s pictures,” he said, noting that this is a Tibetan custom. When we met him at Dorjee Lhatoo’s house, he had just entrusted his precious legacy to Lhatoo. He told us, “I gave all this material to Lhatoo because I want it to be displayed in the HMI mountaineering museum. It is very valuable.”

The porter book is the key. It helps build the story of who Sherpas such as Wangdi Norbu were. It reveals how they were perceived by the men they carried loads for, and provides a résumé of sorts of their careers.

Section divider

Lewa: The Tiger Who Rejected His Stripes 

A black and white photograph taken by Frank Smythe in the Himalaya in 1933. It appears in the new book, Headstrap.
Lewa in 1933. (Photo: Frank Smythe)

A much respected and highly sought-after porter and sardar of the late 1920s and 1930s, Lewa was with Paul Bauer on Kangchenjunga in 1929 and with G. O. Dyhrenfurth on the same mountain in 1930. He made the first ascent of Jonsong with a fellow Sherpa called Tsinabo, and despite having frozen feet, he was also on the first ascent of Kamet in 1931 with Shipton, Smythe, and R. L. Holdsworth. So severe was Lewa’s frostbite that most of his toes had to be amputated. The indomitable Sherpa was back climbing the very next year on Chomiomo. That was followed by Everest in 1933 and Nanga Parbat in 1934. Fritz Bechtold, one of the climbers on the latter peak, wrote, “As first Sirdar, Lewa was chosen, a man who hitherto had distinguished himself on every expedition by his amazing tenacity and endurance both as mountaineer and as leader.”

The final entry on his climbing record shows a series of travels through Tibet and elsewhere with the explorer and botanist Ronald Kaulback from 1935 to 1938. In recognition of his phenomenal career, Lewa was awarded the thirteenth badge when the Tiger was instituted in 1939.

In those early days, Lewa was a familiar sight around Darjeeling. Dorjee Lhatoo remembered seeing him and his friends as a child. Walking to Chowrasta from Toong Soong, the men would be holding on to each other for support after one bowl too many of tomba (a millet-based alcoholic drink fermented by tribes in Nepal, Sikkim, and Darjeeling). Lhatoo told us this story about Lewa’s badge:

“You see, Lewa went to Mr. Kydd, who was the local recruiting agent. He was well known as someone who employed Sherpas to go on expeditions and treks. Mr. Kydd said to him, ‘Lewa, you are too old. Give a chance to the younger people.’ Lewa asked, ‘So, how do we make a living?’ ‘That’s not my problem,’ said Mr. Kydd. Apart from Lewa, there were a couple of other people who were also not being employed. They had brought their badges, and they said, ‘Then why have you given us this?’ They were ignored by Kydd. Then Lewa is reported to have thrown his badge down the hill! Once he did that, the others did it too—they all threw their badges, and then clapped their hands and went home.”

Without expedition work, Lewa found a job as a watchman looking after a series of shops in Siliguri, which was just developing. He lived alone, sending what money he could home to his wife and school-going children in Darjeeling. One day in 1948, he didn’t show up for work and people assumed he had gone home. No one looked for him. Later on, when there was a stink coming from his room, they discovered the dead Lewa. Ang Tsering told Dorjee Lhatoo that they went down and brought Lewa’s body to Darjeeling to cremate, smelling to high heaven. Lewa was only forty-six years old.

Section divider

Phuchung: A Young and Articulate Sherpa 

Phuchung is not from Makalu, but he is an example of the newer Sherpas. He was born in Manebhanjan, a village close to Darjeeling, and his grandparents were traders on the India-Nepal route. When Phuchung was in his first year of college, his father died and the responsibility of looking after his family fell on his shoulders. He left for Dubai, where he worked as a salesman for three years before returning to Darjeeling. Back home, he completed all the HMI courses and started working with expeditions. His brother-in-law Sangye Sherpa helped him get a job at the HMI, where he rose through the ranks from guest instructor to permanent instructor. At first, he had intended to finish college and get a government job, but Phuchung had grown to love what he was doing and he wanted to learn more. “I want to climb all fourteen peaks above 8,000 . . . Not [possible to climb] K2 on an Indian passport, but at least the other thirteen. And I am thinking of doing some new courses like ski courses and rescue courses,” he told us enthusiastically.

Phuchung climbed Everest in 2012. He told us that many older Sherpas lament the fact that Everest has become an easy climb: “People say it’s like a road, but no matter that there is a fixed rope, you have to climb by yourself; nobody is going to push you or carry you.” His ascent was tough at times, but he reminded himself, “You are a Sherpa—you can do it.” It’s this confidence that helps Sherpas lead others up the mountains. Phuchung explained, “People don’t climb alone. They take Sherpas who usually look after their clients very well. That is their duty: to climb mountains, look after their clients, and bring them back safe. Unfortunately, after they come down, only the members’ names will be on the list of those who summitted. Not the names of the Sherpas—that still happens.” What Phuchung said is important. Every year we encounter several expedition accounts in which Sherpa summiteers are not listed. In fact, there are often claims of “solo” ascents in which Sherpa support is conveniently left out.

Phuchung had recently married a Darjeeling girl. He told us, “My wife knows nothing about the mountains. I tried to explain to her that even during a course we have to look at the safety of the students, sometimes risking our lives. There is no phone network; we have to stay for twenty to twenty-five days in the mountains. But she doesn’t understand. I am thinking of making her do one course so that she can understand.”

About the authors

The authors, Nandine Purandare and Deepa Balsavar, standing side by side among green trees

Nandini Purandare is editor of the internationally renowned Himalayan Journal. As a writer and editor for the Avehi-Abacus Project, she has developed educational materials for public schools across India. With a background in economics, Purandare has consulted for various organizations and research centers and is an enthusiastic trekker and avid reader of mountain literature. She, along with co-author Deepa Balsavar, founded the Sherpa Project to record oral histories through in-depth interviews of members of the climbing Sherpa community.

A well-known illustrator and storyteller, Deepa Balsavar has created more than thirty children’s books. She has won numerous awards, including Tata Trusts’ Big Little Book Award for her contribution to children’s literature, worked as a consultant with UNICEF in South Asia, and served as a core team member of the Avehi-Abacus Project for two decades. Balsavar is an adjunct professor in communication design at the Industrial Design Centre, IIT Bombay.

Video loading...

Surviving Everest’s Deadliest Day

Keywords:

  • 1% for the planet
  • 2022 giro d'italia
  • 2024 winter gear guide
  • 2023 winter gear guide
  • video

Are Bolt-On Holds on Rock “Better” Than Chipping?

Are bolt-on holds ugly? Yes. But they can be easily hammered off, whereas chipped holds may be harder to fix. (Of course, it’s best to do neither!)

Heading out the door? Read this article on the new Outside+ app available now on iOS devices for members! Download the app.

In 2009, my wife, Kristin, and I were on our honeymoon on the Spanish island of Ibiza. We’d come for the limestone cragging, not the dance music and clubbing, but it was still “party season” that September, and packs of raucous Euros stumbled about the Western Mediterranean island’s club-lined boulevards into the wee hours, shouting, puking, and generally carrying on. We’d come randomly, after the Spanish photographer David Munilla had sent his new Ibiza guidebook to Climbing Magazine, where we worked then. In the book, the sea looked blue-green, the climbing looked steep, and the crags were close together.

So we went.

Ibiza’s climbing was super fun, though many routes still had their original steel bolts, sketchy and rotting in the salty air. Then it began to rain—and rain and rain. One day, looking for somewhere dry, we went to an inland crag called Jolibud (the Spanish pronunciation for “Hollywood”) that looked wicked overhanging in the photos. But it was soaked, with black streaks running down the wall. As we walked along the base, I spotted a series of curious blobs that looked different from the other tufa features. Then I realized: These were bolt-on holds!

Kristin at Jolibud, Ibiza. (Photo: Matt Samet Collection)

Per the guidebook, to maximize the real estate at Jolibud, the locals had experimented with these “resin holds” as well as “a hammer and chisel and sika (how well this was done is a matter of taste) [….]” I didn’t think much of it at the time. I’d lived in Italy, where around Torino drilled, sika-lined pockets and glued-on rocks were commonplace on the blank gneiss, with similar tactics in nearby France, where I sometimes went to climb around Briançon. And I’d seen “outdoor artificial routes” before, during a trip to Smith Rock in October 1990. There, on a chossy roof high up a side gully, the locals had built training routes using gym holds. One—Bend Over and Receive—even got a mention in Climbing when a local fired it, for one of America’s first 5.13 onsights. (The editors likely had no idea it was an artificial climb. The routes were later removed when—as I heard through the grapevine—Smith Rock State Park expressed their dismay.)

More recently, Magnus Midtbø, in a reaction video to viral climbing clips on his More Magnus YouTube channel, talks about a multi-pitch climb with bolt-on holds. The route, Seenot, on the Falkensteinwand outside Salzburg, Austria, climbs smooth limestone above the picturesque Wolfgangsee Lake. On a cruxy-looking corner, someone has installed a bolt-on hold on the face, to facilitate passage where the crack pinches down. “There’s a climbing hold on the route,” says Midtbø. “[….On] a lot of routes in the middle of Europe and even in southern France, there [are] a lot of routes with artificial holds on them—[and] it’s really ugly. But sometimes it’s better than chipping because these artificial holds, you can actually just hammer off if you don’t want to use them.

“So, future generations, they could just knock them off and not use them. But if you drill into the rock, it’s harder to hide. So that’s the argument for placing artificial climbing holds on outdoor routes.”

*****

Far from endorsing the practice, which he repeatedly labels “ugly,” Midtbø is instead saying this could be one reason for bolt-ons: to avoid chipping, so that a route could go free at some future standard. But Seenot looked far from cutting edge; more holds had been added higher, all, it seems, to give the route a more-consistent difficulty, a very European, plaisir-type approach to rock climbing.

As I watched Midtbø’s video and pondered all this, as well as the artificial routes I’d seen in Ibiza and at Smith, I recalled a similar climb from the early 1990s in my own backyard of the Front Range, Colorado. The route, Public Enemy, in Clear Creek Canyon west of Golden, had sparked a minor controversy, eventually going through a few iterations to reach its present-day form, a 5.13c with “one old drilled pocket” that goes partway up the River Wall but stops at an anchor 30 feet shy of the top. The climb tackles a steep, leaning black-and-gray panel, imposing from US 6 and capped by a massive, two-tiered roof/headwall with ghostly white streaks.

“We were probably out at Sonic Youth one day, and I’m always looking at new stuff,” says Kurt Smith, 60, a climbing legend originally from California who was part of Public Enemy’s FA. With his friend Mike Pont, Smith had in 1990 bolted and freed the classic, double-overhanging corner of Sonic Youth (5.13a) just left of Public Enemy, part of the first wave of sport routes on the gneiss of Clear Creek, at the time a chossy backwater. Smith, who’d moved to Colorado from the California proving grounds of Yosemite Valley, Tuolumne, and Joshua Tree—where he’d established dozens of bold, difficult, ground-up FAs up to 5.13—was working with Pont as a setter and employee at Paradise Rock Gym in Denver. The two, says Smith, were “joined at the hip.”

Kurt Smith working a Clear Creek project in 1990. (Photo: Kurt Smith collection)

Continues Smith, “That whole face caught my eye. I remember thinking, ‘There’s probably a route here—this should go.’” When Smith rapped in, however, he realized that the upper headwall looked unclimbable. He, Pont, and the Boulder local Pete Zoller got a rope on the face but could only climb the first two-thirds before it “seemed to really blank out.”

“We really didn’t want to chip it,” recalls Smith. “A lot of that was going in Europe, Idaho [City of Rocks and Leslie Gulch, two early sport areas] […] and so for me it was just, ‘Let’s slap a couple of plastic holds from the gym on it and just go make it a training route or whatever.’” The trio bolted a handful of plastic holds from Paradise onto the upper headwall, and Smith sent the full pitch at 5.13+.

“We were just out there, we’re young (all three men were in their 20s), we’re just trying to get another route in and just find ways to get stronger,” he says. “If somebody could do it without the holds, like by grabbing onto some micro-crimp, they could just go up there, take the holds off, and then, ‘There you go!’ We didn’t even really think about it.”

When I moved to Boulder in autumn of 1991, I knew of Public Enemy through a profile of Smith in a small publication, The Sport Climbing Connection. Clear Creek was one of the first frequented sport areas in the Front Range—until  people caught on to Rifle; then, it just became somewhere to train for Rifle. In the meantime, the bolt-ons had disappeared, and you no longer saw them from US 6 while driving by—en route to Rifle. As Zoller later told me, two local climbers had taken offense and removed the grips. (Says Smith, “The old guard, rightly so, were bent out of shape. I knew when we bolted holds on that thing that people would be upset.”) Zoller told me he got into a heated discussion with one of the men in the parking lot at The Boulder Mountaineer, a climbing shop in town, when he asked for the holds back; apparently, they’d been donated to a kids’ climbing program.

Public Enemy went dormant until 2011, when a local climber, Brian Kimball, snagged the retro-FA to the low anchor. Per Kevin Capps’s Clear Creek Canyon, 2nd edition, “[…] Kimball came along and cleaned it up, filled in some of the drilled pockets (one still remains, but the route can be climbed without it, although it’s much harder), and hung fixed draws” as part of the many linkups up to 5.14b Kimball would concoct on this same panel. (The origin and timing of the alleged drilled pockets, which were lower on the route, remain unclear.)

*****

From the Public Enemy brouhaha, Smith says that he learned how to better let the rock “dictate what you’re going to do,” and that, “Since then I’ve walked away from plenty of projects that I couldn’t climb and just left the bolts there for somebody else.” In Rifle in 1991, he created his last artificial hold—a drilled pocket on his climb Daydream Nation (5.13c) in the Skull Cave—send the route with it, then, realizing that “That was really dumb,” came back, filled the pocket in, and re-sent the line. (The hold is visible, as a right-hand grip, at minute 49 in the first Masters of Stone film.) Smith says that later in his first-ascent career—which went on to span dozens of benchmark FAs in Rifle and El Potrero Chico, including the world-famous El Sendero Luminoso (5.12+; 1,500 feet)—had he encountered another climb like Public Enemy, he’d either have walked away or just put the anchor in below the blank section.

Today, the top third of Public Enemy remains unclimbed. One climber who has checked it out is Chris Deuto, who grew up just west of Clear Creek Canyon in Saint Mary’s and cut his teeth in the canyon, doing his first 5.14a on the River Wall and establishing new climbs up to 5.14b in the canyon. Deuto, 20, has been climbing since age 7, when he started at the Boulder Rock Club with his parents and, later, continued as a member of the gym’s youth team.

Chris Deuto working the upper headwall of Public Enemy. (Photo: Cody Snow)

“None of the routes on that wall go to the top,” Deuto says, and so he started to wonder, Could it be done? Deuto rapped down the headwall, where the old bolt holes from the gym holds were still visible. He says that the top third of Public Enemy will certainly go free, though it will be very difficult—“the hardest thing in Clear Creek.” He and Kevin Capps rebolted the headwall around 2020, more or less following the path of the gym holds, though one bolt may need to be moved to avoid a contrived sequence.

“My vision for the line is to start on the 5.12a, the warmup [Love Your Enemies, which finishes at the same anchor], because the climbing up there above the anchor is already so hard,” Deuto says. Deuto spent a couple days on the headwall and “couldn’t pull a single move,” but figures it will break down into a V12/13, to the one hold—a fingerlock—good enough to clip from, to a V13/14 to the top, stacking up to V15/V16 for the integral section.

“Really natural, good rock, aesthetic movement, in this exposed position—it’s going to be really hard, I think. 5.15 for sure,” Deuto says, adding that once the headwall gets sorted, you could begin with any of the starts to the low anchor, including the 5.14b Positive Vibrations. Deuto thinks you could also do the route on gear, leading the 5.12a on pro (which has already been done) and then loading cams into a good horizontal at the lower anchor, though on the headwall you’d need to avoid hogging the key fingerlock with pro.

As for Deuto’s feelings about bolting on holds versus chipping, he brings up a nuanced point, one perhaps known only—or mainly—to active first ascensionists: “With sport climbing, what most people don’t realize is that most routes they’re climbing on were modified in some way, even if it’s justified as cleaning. Because most sport cliffs aren’t solid enough to house a perfect line of holds.” Deuto lists Rifle, where many holds have been comfortized or reinforced but perhaps would only be visible as such to a practiced eye—or are by now so covered in chalk that you’d have no idea. He says that as long as you’re open about your tactics, and don’t wholesale sculpt finger pockets in blank rock, you’re probably operating within fair ethical boundaries; putting up new climbs, especially on softer rock like limestone or sandstone, is a massive gray area. Deuto cites the 5.15b Sleeping Lion, Chris Sharma’s latest testpiece on the limestone of Siurana, Spain, on which Sharma and Alex Megos agreed Megos could glue a key hold back on after Megos broke it, to preserve the route’s flow, even though the climb would still probably have gone. (“It’s not nice at all,” says Megos, in his German way, about this less pleasant sequence.) In this case, the climbers showed the whole process on YouTube.

Meanwhile, Smith points out—before we all clutch our pearls—that manufacturing has been part of free climbing since the Golden Age of the 1970s, when Jim Bridwell chiseled footholds on the second pitch of Outer Limits, the classic 5.10b on the Cookie Cliff in Yosemite, and Ray Jardine chipped a short section on the Nose, crossing a blank slab on 5.11d edges on the so-called “Jardine Traverse” in an effort to free the climb. Says Smith, “It’s part of the history of climbing whether we like it or not. It’s been going on forever.”

And, in fact, it has: In 1882, the guides Jean-Joseph Maquinax and Daniele Battista used a hammer to create holds on the first ascent of the Dent du Géant’s south peak while standing on iron spikes they’d pounded into cracks; in 1892, the English climber Norman Collie carved footholds with an ice axe on the crux of Moss Ghyll gully in the Lake District; and in Yosemite in 1934, on the first ascent of the Regular Route on Cathedral Spire, Dick Leonard used his piton hammer to create a “series of nicks” along a fragile flake he was hesitant to layback. Since then, climbers the world over have chipped, enhanced, glued, and otherwise modified thousands of holds, even if we all pay rote lip service to how “Chipping and gluing are bad” without considering how difficult it is to delineate chipping from cleaning, or how routes at the outer edges of difficulty, where the grips are sparse, can’t really afford to lose any holds—hence the occasional need to reinforce with epoxy. As someone who’s put up dozens of climbs over the past 35 years, I can confirm that it’s extremely rare to find a solid climb with perfect holds that needs nothing beyond a quick brushing. You get those only rarely (usually on granite or water-hardened rock), so if you don’t want your route to be patently unsafe, covered in friable rock and unreliable holds, then you’re going to need to clean it.

Are bolt-on holds ugly? Aesthetically, yes: They rarely match the rock color and they protrude like warts. Even your garden-variety non-climber stumbling by on the trail could pick them out—and then complain to the powers-that-be. But consider that this same civilian, down on the ground, would likely not be able to tell a drilled pocket from a natural one, especially once both holds are covered in chalk; they’d have no idea, and many climbers wouldn’t either. So which scenario is more detrimental, at least from an access standpoint?

In the grand scheme of humankind’s many impacts on our planet, I’d posit that manufacturing and bolting on holds are very small ones that will mostly go unnoticed by anyone but climbers, and have minimal environmental impact compared to industrial-scale depredations like air pollution, plastic waste, tainted waterways, and maritime oil spills. However, within the microcosm of the climbing world, where we’ve agreed to play by certain rules, both violate the idea that “manufacturing is cheating.” The needle has seemingly swung away from the more wholesale, and often distasteful, approach to hold manufacture that went on in the 1980s and 1990s. But I also believe that most of us would be shocked to learn just how many holds on the world’s current hardest sport climbs have at the very least been cleaned, if not comfortized and/or reinforced, even with the big rise in standards. Or how shocked your average-Joe climber would be to learn that hard big-wall free climbing, say on El Capitan, relies heavily on old piton scars—essentially chipped pockets—in the seams and cracks. There is nowhere human beings go where we don’t conform the landscape to our passage nor leave some trace of said passage—just like every other living thing; it’s naïve to pretend otherwise, despite our blinkered American infatuation with some fictional, sepia-toned prelapsarian “wilderness.” And it’s idiotic to insist that rock climbing always reflect this unattainable ideal without considering what really happens with first ascents on subpar rock. Sure, we should aim to minimize our impact when climbing, but we should also bring that same approach to all our actions in life—or it’s all just performative, self-righteous bullshit.

So it is better to bolt on a hold than to chip? If you feel you must do one or the other, them I’d say the evidence points toward yes, at least in terms of preserving the challenge (but probably not access!). The fact that the full Public Enemy could today go at 5.15, the new world standard, is a case in point. But realistically, it’s best to do neither. It’s probably best to, as Smith suggests, slam an anchor in where the climbing stops being feasible for you, and then let future generations take it from there.

Also Read