Talk:Exodus Cry

WikiProject Sexology and sexuality / Sex work	hide(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles  Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sex work task force (marked as Low-importance).

This page is being monitored and vandalized to attack the organization Exodus Cry: The biased and defamatory edits to the page constitute vandalism[edit]

This page is being vandalized and cannot be confirmed or used as a reliable source of information about Exodus Cry, its founder, its employees, its history, its activities or its views.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by FactChecker4Truth (talk • contribs) 18:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@FactChecker4Truth: Not sure if you're connected with Exodus Cry, but if you are, Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects might be of interest. Trivialist (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@FactChecker4Truth: Exodus Cry vandalism has resulted in a request for page protections. Not liking the negative national coverage of an organization is not a reason to hide it from the public. Violetta2019 (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Perez Hilton ban?[edit]

I am not sure this is worth adding to the page, but celebrity Perez Hilton posted and linked to a critique of Exodus Cry on his own website (https://perezhilton.com/pornhub-removes-videos-unverified-content/) and was suspended from Facebook (for 24 hours) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gSA3MNXPeE&feature=youtu.be. Since Exodus Cry editors were trying to rapidly remove all the critiques of Exodus Cry on wikipedia, this seems like an additional data point supporting the idea that they are trying to hide all critiques of them? On the other hand...it is Perez Hilton. Violetta2019 (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

International House of Prayer[edit]

Exodus Cry has publicly denied connections with the International House of Prayer, likely due to its vitrioloically anti-LGBT stance. It turns out Exodus Cry's listed "Secretary, Treasurer and Director" is "Lenny Laguardia" (see page 7 https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/262317116_201812_990_2019120616930514.pdf). He is senior vice president of International House of Prayer (https://www.ihopkc.org/resources/biography/lenny-laguardia/). They are openly anti-gay https://www.ihopkc.org/about/affirmations-and-denials/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tp89j9c4t98 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Traffickinghub controversies[edit]

I suggest we make a "controversy" subsection in the Traffickinghub section with information about two alleged pornhub victims (Rose Kalemba & Avri Sapir) that were marketed as leading examples of victims whose abuse was posted on pornhub, because very significant evidence has come to light that both of the stories are fabricated. So much so that at least one source has added an addendum to their article mentioning Avri Sapir pointing out that "since publishing this article, strong evidence has come to our attention that “Avri Sapir”, one of the key anti-porn activists who identified as a child sexual abuse survivor in the campaign against Pornhub, had fabricated her horrific story"

Some sources: Traffickinghub promoting Avri Sapir's Story: https://twitter.com/LailaMickelwait/status/1260116757978677249 The article that updated with a disclaimer at the bottom pointing out that the story was false https://prostasia.org/blog/the-war-on-porn-does-not-help-children/ Source used in that article as the evidence: https://terminus.keybase.pub/

The other person with a very controversial story is Rose Kalemba. A video series showed that she most likely copied the entire legal proceedings portion of her story off of a real Ohio 2010 article with identical facts like, it happened at the same time, same place as Rose's story, victims had the same ages, same number of rapists, also with the same ages, thought to have gotten off easy because one of them had a lawyer father who got them no prison time, with "victim blaming" as the main aspect of the story. Videos here: Part 1 & 3: https://www.Danotube.com/rose-kalemba-trilogy/ and Part 2: https://vimeo.com/495334209

I know pointing out that someone might be dishonest about something as horrible as sexual abuse is a very uncomfortable subject, and I take no pleasure in talking about it, but the truth is more important. Convex reproxy (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I agree that there should be some discussion about this, but I am in support. The primary sources are self-documenting. Exodus Cry's amplification of fraudulent information was picked up by mainstream journalists ^[1]. Let's give this a few days and then if it seems uncontroversial, make the edit. Jeremy Malcolm (talk) 00:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)