
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: KoNkJLkF)  02/06/23(Mon)08:38:38 No.415030682▶>>415031148
>>415029385
No, they weren't. Those were infected cell cultures. 0 viruses have been isolated. The way "viruses" are studied is by studying cell cultures infected with the "viral" disease. So the viruses are studied by observing infected cells, and the only evidence we have that that disease is caused by "viruses" is that the disease as classified as a viral disease. It is self-referential circular logic and not scientific in the least. Or might you explain why viruses are not detectable via electron micsroscopy despite being at least trillions of times bigger than the smallest objects observable by electron microscopy?

-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: KoNkJLkF)  02/06/23(Mon)09:30:22 No.415035628▶>>415036438
>>415031148
>It has been done countless times
If you're going to call Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis a liar, then at least provide proof. Should be simple enough to find an image taken with electron microscopy, and not a CG one. All it takes is one image for you to prove Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis a liar.

At least you now admit no virus has wver been isolated. Though you got weirdly angry while admitting it.
-------------------------------------------------------------

