
-------------------------------------------------------------
Time To Realize It's All A Scam Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:24:50 No.432396498▶>>432396804 >>432397704 >>432398453 >>432398817 >>432398829 >>432399757 >>432400003 >>432400237 >>432400847 >>432401258 >>432401909 >>432402223 >>432404098 >>432404528 >>432406583 >>432407368 >>432407599 >>432408449 >>432411123 >>432412217 >>432413094 >>432413525 >>432413830 >>432414079
1903: America is a chill country with lots of good down home country folks doing pretty well. Some entrepreneurship, goods merchants, steamboat captains, etc.
Rich dudes:
>I want to charge monopoly prices and build ten factories to outproduce rivals and be super rich.
Reality: competition crashes prices, rich dudes can't justify making orders of magnitude more money for the "labor" of happening to own capital.

So they created a fucking system:
>Child prison labor camps with military drill bells and no days off allowed not even beautiful spring days which are perfect for playing ball in the yard.
>College, the perfect young adult socialization mind control environment which gets everyone on the same page.
>"Professionalism" and professional institutions, which soft gatekeep without official laws that anyone can vote on and without advertising their work.
>"We don't hire if you have a job gap, imagine not working 40-80 hours a week every week of your life. What could you possibly have been doing with your time for six months, if not wageslaving?
>Up or out promotion
>Networking: "Well there's no nepotism or laws about what you have to believe to work here, but that's why we screen for things off the clock at cocktail hour."
>Student loans: "Hope you weren't planning to ever stop working for 20 years".
>Wage/salary structure: "You're not allowed to ask what others are paid. Yes the company can afford to pay you more, but we musn't do that, it would inflate salaries across the industry. We're not supposed to do that."

Anons, where do you think all these "standards" and "professional culture" come from?
Why do you think corporations have legally required Board structures?
This system was design 100 years ago as a soft tyranny.

Professional corporatism is not the free market. It's a very soft, quiet form of communist bureaucracy.
Modern society is literally a scam
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:42:39 No.432398307▶>>432398671 >>432399081 >>432399261 >>432415619
>>432397761
Stop talking about communism.
Rockefeller occultists set up a system in schools, colleges and the work place, through professional institutions funded by philanthropic organizations, to directly manage professional culture and work standards in minute detail.
You just take it for granted because it's what you're used to.
>used it for social purposes
Through what mechanism? Always the government, huh?
When people were doing it through family, churches and mutual aid societies.
When production side labor and family business were switching to coop. Switching from gold to silver.
When money was being pulled from big city banks.

That process was interrupted through government intervention and basically warfare by regulation.
People were seduced into the system with basically war bounties, fat salaries and toys and gadgets, but at the price of learning how to be a team player. Of learning the unspoken rules of the very real system
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:36:49 No.432397704▶>>432398007 >>432401781
>>432396498 (OP)
Yeah of course they'd slide this thread.
Nobody is willing to admit that this system was actually designed. They think this is all a market outcome, and can't even see the obvious levers of control that are part of it.
Why do you think ESG is happening?
Why do you think professionals are so willing to sell the country down the river?
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:46:37 No.432398671▶>>432399557 >>432399661
>>432397761
>>432398307
Basically, free America was conquered by the Rockefeller system over 100 years ago.
It hasn't been about whatever "capitalism" means since then.
There is no such thing as "capitalism".
You are correct, this idea of "neoliberalism" which has to become "closed circuit fourth industrial revolution smart economies", is what it all really is.
But there was no stable system that is both 20th century corporate capitalist, but not neoliberal.
The 20th century model burned through natural wealth, then had to bomb and rob foreign markets, and ran of their money by the 1970s, so they turned to tech, stock buybacks, financialization to rob the world economies even more.
It's only the underdevelopment of Asia that even allowed this.
They were growing so they didn't notice that 90 cents of every dollar they grew was stolen from them
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:48:02 No.432398821▶>>432399975
>>432398647
No, sorry, there is a Rockefeller system. They hired sociologists and psychologists to develop it. They set up teams to build it up and stand it up in every university and most major corporations. At the teaching colleges.
This is my point. People ignore this because they think what we see is just "modern capitalism" and fail to see the actual designed system that we're living it
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)05:50:58 No.432399091▶>>432400425 >>432400598
>>432398453
Compromise can be spoiled through basic game condition manipulation.
Concealing information distorts game analysis. Some humans are psychologically predisposed to certain behavior like psychopathy and narcissism, and they also operate using concealed information about their true nature.
Exploiting short-term versus long-term thinking. Divide and conquer.

This is how compromise was destabilized.
But American social, cultural, real wealth has been spent. It's gone
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)06:02:22 No.432400166▶>>432400976 >>432401542 >>432402403 >>432402591 >>432403335 >>432403938
>>432399261
No.
In America we have "civil society institutions" like churches (a state institution in Euroland), charities, social clubs, civic clubs, mutual aid societies.
These were slowly subverted and converted into "professional institutions" like the American Medical Association, or corporate charities like Salvation Army.
"Philanthropic organizations" is more or less what you said. But in America they are the specific locus of funding and organization between capitalists and this professional structure they were building.
In America, these organizations overlap heavily with the government, and are hardly "NGOs".

But yes, NGOs are the "export" version of the philanthropic organization, with elements of the professional institutions built in. They are Rockefeller colonial orgs outside of America.

Because, Euroland and the world don't have a strong tradition of civil society. You're peasants
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: GrDoGtbP)  06/28/23(Wed)06:06:57 No.432400598▶>>432401968
>>432399091
Sure, but all of this relies on exploiting inhomogeneities in the society. The psychopaths and narcissists react differently to the same conditions, and thus represent a faultline that the society can be fractured along. Trying to optimise conditions for one group will pesimise conditions for the other. Anyone concerned with maximising cooperation would be trying to find ways to identify these inhomogeneities and segregate them into locally homogeneous societies to eliminate
>Improved conditions for me means worse conditions for you
as a conflict source.

1. People segregating into locally homogeneous societies to minimise the degree to which compromise inhibits cooperation.
2. Water, oil etc demixing to minimise the thermodynamic free energy cost of surface area between the fluids.

Cooperative society vs competitive society is literally just a thermodynamic phase transition in the society
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)06:59:05 No.432405516▶>>432406467 >>432407154 >>432408737
>>432405042
It's not that. I agree with you.

The problem is, how the fuck do we disentangle this system. Most of it is not government based.
When we mostly grew our own food and had chilckens in the yard, we could afford to "walk away" from corporate America.
Almost nobody (percentage wise) in America can do that anymore.
We could repeal all regulations, and would still be stuck with these corporate systems.

At least, I want to discuss that there is actually a designed system that mandates our pattern of modern life in America. And it will show its hand if anyone succeeds in ever building a successful alternative path.
The rest of the time, it stays invisible and you'd think this system was just a market outcome.
>>
 Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)07:02:40 No.432405817▶>>432406045
>>432405432
Witchcraft, kabbalah, Hermeticism, masonry.

The idea is that individual thought and being is evidence of an injury to the divine world soul, which is meant to be one, and the "Great Work", "Tikkun Olam", the society that comes when all racial and gender divisions are dissolved, and we are all brown, raceless trannies, is going to be one of magical truth and harmony which our spiritual divisions blind us from seeing today.

They want a society with no independence, where your very thoughts are imposed upon, and you are forced to conceive of yourself as a worthless appendage of a greater whole.
So, communist economics, or computer interface mind meld Borg shit.
The basic concept is pretty clear.

This is the ideology behind these people, and why they are engaged in self-sacrificial, selfless, intergenerational efforts to build this thing.
Even tolerance, though not bad in itself, has been used as a "let's cause people to care less about their own culture so that they defend it less."
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)07:10:55 No.432406527▶
>>432406026
Yeah this happens a lot.
The same shampoo will be put into bottles with labels for the local grocery store for some reason.
There's not really a lot of "capitalism" happening, all this growth and competition is in the books. Our production capacity is high, but vulnerable to supply shocks and labor shortage.
Not as communism, but as a basic market force, more wealth ought to end up in workers' wallets.
They could easily walk away from bad deals until a more accurate equilibrium emerged. The top 20% of wealth holders should never mathematically control more than 80% of the wealth.
But the system I'm talking about is designed to neuter game players, to rig the market game. To make it impossible to walk away and wait for a better deal.
It's gotten so bad though it's kind of happening a little
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)07:42:09 No.432409131▶
>>432407154
>abstract dogma and feel-good bullshit
Lol, exactly

It's "the critique" within liberalism. Liberalism leads straight into nihilism. All the "values" in a liberal society are vestigial traditions that liberals of that era have so ingrained they take them for granted even though their philosophy doesn't uphold them.
So, every generation, all you have is a critique of why a tradition or norm restricts. But liberalism is unable to say, "Because REALITY restricts, we need counter norms to minimize the damage from reality." Liberalism can say reality restricts, but it cannot positively argue for norms, there's no basis for it to do so.

Ask liberals about this. It's always denial and then bullshit like
>Well I do have values, treat each other well and be reasonable.
By what standards nigga?

Anyway, I have in my repertoire a non-traditional ideal religion, but lately I've been wanting to just use the Bible unironically just because it seems to piss them off so badly.
My concept is the orthogonality of the sacred and secular.

The idea is that we actually don't believe that evidence of the Bible is in history, that the Bible is a transubstantiation of history, and where through faith and grace, the reality of saints and so forth can become true, that we can graft the sacred history onto our mundane present through grace, but we do not seek the sacred in the secular.

I also want a soft Marcionite interpretation of the Bible, which is just basically saying that Jesus is answering a question the Jewish nation has posed, but that said and done, he is not a product of Judaism nor of a Jewish quality. Almost like Judaism is kind of an antithesis to Christianity in the same paradigm. Like, it's the wrong answer to the question, which Christ by contrast shows what is correct
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: toGVC7cv)  06/28/23(Wed)07:57:36 No.432410623▶
>>432408737
Then you don't understand the Rockefeller system.
We would have to totally let it all fall apart.

We don't have the banking technology to manage investment in a post-bimetallist paradigm.

We don't have enough food we grow in our own yards to deal with the disruption needed to sort out the details.

All I'm saying is the average American is currently in a situation of choosing between one control system or another.
The market way of doing things won't work because we live our lives in the Urban, single family household, professional career momentum, credential premise of education, pattern of life.

What, you expect normies to go on boomer Facebook to figure out how to deal with radical economic and social change in a meaningful and responsible way?
-------------------------------------------------------------

