
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 09/11/23(Mon)07:39:53 No.95924656▶>>95924686 >>95924863 >>95925096 >>95925447 >>95934993
>>95924581
>Name one advantage that they have besides a license that allows corpos to rake them over the coals?
Not only big corpos cucked linus and the Linux kernel and made their own bitch, you also endorse you personally being cucked by said companies by learning, using, and contributing to their kernel for free and not being able to exploit your own code commercially without them have it
Once they decide they are done with linus they will thrash it like a used condom

Are you listening to yourself or you are cucked to the point you are unable to see who is cucking who?

-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 09/16/23(Sat)21:53:36 No.96036601▶>>96036624 >>96050641 >>96052719
>>96036517
see retards like this are exactly what >>96036351 is all about.
this is a distorded view on FreeBSD, but you are obviously too stupid to even know that FreeBSD has nothing to do with what luke smith told you OpenBSD is. FreeBSD is not about being minimal or secure, or even special. It's a universal operating system just like Debian. A complete system with bloat like sendmail still included (will be phased out next release though). Netflix, Sony, even PlayStation use FreeBSD for their computation tasks. The only cockslave for corps is Linux. FreeBSD doesn't accept commits from companies like google, microsoft, redhat that kill the userbase and kernel like in linux. What choice do you even have on the supposedly alternative OS like linux? Even on gentoo you HAVE to run parts of systemd to make anything work. I do not care for GPL or BSD but I can assure you that the linux world has been cucked every day.
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 09/17/23(Sun)14:30:55 No.96050565▶
File: 1693281542721434.jpg (827 KB, 2404x1260)
827 KB
>>96050492
you don't even know what this means nigger. your os is the one who is polluted by corporate garbage. i am sorry that you have to deal with cannonical and redhat poisioning every aspect of your linux world. and that's just the tip of the iceberg, the things you can actively see. worse is that every subtier tech nigger company commits useless and borderline malicious code to the kernel and other tools that you now can't escape from.

freebsd i sort of like wtfpl, you let others do whatever with your code but not let them commit trash that isn't in line with the project's view. freebsd never had to rewrite their sound architecture, while linux had to at least 3 times. all fails. even pipewire can't compare with the simple way of doing sound on freebsd.

i hope one day you will find peace with your shitty duct taped mess that you call an os, with no documentation, random software versions and reeinventing the wheel every decade. hey. at least you got docker so you can spin up more shitty OSs on the fly
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 10/21/23(Sat)01:22:13 No.96807126▶>>96807160 >>96814757 >>96836341
>>96806481
i read a post not too long ago that i found pretty convincing. that, paraphrasing,
>the BSD license actually PROTECTS bsd from corporate takeover since corporations can freely spin off their own derivatives. whereas otherwise they might be compelled to throw their weight at redirecting the development of the source product in the aims of making their own ends possible.
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 10/21/23(Sat)08:14:31 No.96814757▶
>>96807257
openbsd does have a foundation and get corporate donations (surpassing freebsd even) because they rely on it for secure core network infrastructure but the difference is that
1. they don't get influence over the foundation because
>https://www.openbsdfoundation.org/membership.html
>As stated in our bylaws, membership in the corporation is at the discretion of the directors. We are not actively seeking new members at this time.
2. the foundation is totally separate from openbsd and its only purpose is to fund clearly defined activities in a transparent manner (you can even directly donate to opebsd if you wish)
>https://www.openbsdfoundation.org/activities.html
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwCZuN4qQPI&t=2529s [Embed]
theo talks about it here
>>96807126
this does hold some weight
the nature of the of no politics, freedom, voluntary contributions has amounted to a drama-free environment focused on technical merit. it's such a breath of fresh air
ever notice that there is usually a huge bureaucratic entity accompanying big gpl projects?

-------------------------------------------------------------

It cucks the developer, not the user. A cuck would have to search linuxforums and stack overflow for information that should be in a manual. A cuck sweats whether pacman -Syu is going to make his system unusable. A cuck sits and watches "A stop job is running ( 0 min 31 sec / 10 min) [***]". A cuck desperately types apt-get -f install to revive his frankenstein system. A cuck consciously uses a distribution marked "unstable". A cuck can't do anything but watch as GTK and Qt battle on his computer. A cuck has to solve the mysteries of boot log by wrangling with binary files. A cuck doesn't use software with a particular license because of some fat American autist who eats toe jam.
