
-------------------------------------------------------------
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1164923.pdf
Strikingly, few national laws or international agreements restrict the weaponization of or attacks on the human brain. While current U.N. treaties against biological and chemical weapons, specifically some neuro-microbiologicals, chemicals, and toxins are prohibited, currently most neuroweapons fall into a legal and regulatory gap, as it does not fit either of these two categories.110 The two UN disarmament treaties, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) (also known as just the BWC – Biological Weapons Convention) and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which serve as non-binding and non-enforceable mechanisms to restrict weaponization, are typically reactive in nature.

Regulation may be forthcoming, but it is not proactive in addressing emerging neuro S&T. Additionally, as this is a new area of science, many definitions established decades ago are either too broad, vague, or not applicable to potential neuroweapons. Similar to nuclear development, science often forges ahead of political and ethical matters of use, a term called “the Collingridge dilemma” named after the academic who coined it. This is clearly the case for neuroweapons. Dr. Malcolm Dando, Professor of International Security at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford in the United Kingdom, and author and expert in weapons proliferation, highlighted the potential misuse of advances in neuroscience in his 2015 book, Neuroscience and the Future of Chemical-Biological Weapons.111 In it, he documents the development of neuro S&T under civilian research that has numerous, potentially dangerous, dual-use applications, and explores efforts by the international community to ensure such research is not used for nefarious purposes. He pays particular attention to the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of neuro S&T, and is more qualified to interpret the trends in science.112

The incidents in Cuba, dubbed the “Havana Syndrome,” are not isolated events. A similar incident occurred in Guangzhou, China, in 2017,13 and as many as 200 Americans have developed UBI/AHI symptoms after serving in at least 16 different countries, including the United States.14 Every day appears to bring more information about the frequency and locations of this type of incident, including disrupting Vice President Kamala Harris’ recent trip to Vietnam, an alarming fact considering the highest levels of security provided.15 “There are probably a couple of hundred incidents across the U.S. government and across the globe,” current CIA Director William Burns recently stated.16 For obvious reasons, the government has kept most of this information close-hold, refraining from speculation presumably as the intelligence and justice communities investigate, analyze, and draw inferences. As the quote at the beginning of this chapter

While the first instances of Havana Syndrome took place in Russia or countries where Russia retains significant influence, in 2017 and 2018 more cases took place in Guangzhou, China, where the United States operates a consulate. The first case occurred when a Commerce Department employee woke up in her bed in late 2017 due to a pulsing, humming sound that not only came from a specific direction but gave her intense pressure in her head.140 She experienced these sounds and sensations for months, and was eventually medically evacuated back to the United States in 2018 where she has lingering effects of the attack, such as memory loss, vision impairment, coordination issues, and a brain scan that is similar to the victims in Cuba.141 Almost a dozen total consulate personnel were evacuated from China in June 2018 due to suffering from Havana Syndrome symptoms.142

There were also reports of Havana Syndrome in the Central Asian country of Kyrgyzstan, though it is unclear exactly when in 2020 these instances took place.156 A U.S. military officer stationed in Kyrgyzstan pulled his car into a busy intersection and began feeling an intense pressure in his head and his two-year old son, who was in the backseat, began screaming.157 As the officer quickly left the intersection the sensation subsided, and his son stopped screaming.158 Additionally, a CIA officer from the same location—though with no ties to the military officer—reported a similar incident as well.159 Significantly, retroactive analysis of cell phone data indicated both victims were located near GRU—Russia’s military intelligence service—vehicles when these events happened. While not definitive proof of Russian involvement due to the frequency of Russian intelligence officials following U.S. officials, it is nonetheless strong circumstantial evidence of Russian involvement.160

In July of 2021, Adam Entous, a reporter for The New Yorker who previously reported on Havana Syndrome, revealed that there were now two dozen suspected cases of Havana Syndrome in Vienna, Austria, which represents the largest number of cases in any country other than Cuba itself.161 While there are not many public details available, the two-dozen affected are diplomats, intelligence officials, and other government officials who are stationed in Vienna.162 The historically permissive espionage environment and Cold War significance of Vienna are again another indicator of Russia being behind the Havana Syndrome attacks.163 A different reported case occurred in Germany, where a diplomat’s time in Berlin was cut short due to the effects.164 Later reporting indicated an additional two U.S. officials in Berlin also sought medical treatment for Havana Syndrome symptoms.165

About a month after the almost two-dozen cases were reported in Vienna, more cases occurred in Vietnam. On 24 August, Havana Syndrome symptoms were so severe that at least two U.S. diplomats had to be medically evacuated from Hanoi after an attack in their personal residences.166 Officials acknowledged these are not the first incidents to occur in Vietnam, but earlier investigations were unable to confirm exactly what happened.167 Significantly, the reports of these cases delayed Vice President Harris’ trip to Hanoi by several hours, as her delegation waited in Singapore to ensure it was safe for her to continue to Vietnam.168

Not only are they real, they've already been fucking used, you dipshit. The people who've been exposed to the effects of these devices, which are presumably microwave or ultrasound-based directed-energy weapons, have suffered neurological changes and cognitive impairment comparable to sustaining massive fucking concussions. It has been measured, in a lab, using MRIs and cognition panels done on the actual fucking victims. Judging by your level of reasoning, I would say that you've already been exposed to one, but I'm going to go out on a limb and venture that you're naturally stupid.

International law hasn't caught up. In fact, the media are trying to bury it all and write Havana Syndrome off as mass hysteria to keep the public from realizing that neuroweapons exist. You are so fucking dense, you don't even realize what the implications of a new and unspoken arms race are. One that the WEF have dipped their toes into, with their very suspicious claims about neurotech.

WEF contributors are absolutely on the cutting edge of neuroscience, behavioral science, "nudge theory", and the rest of this bullshit. They have DARPA and Tavistock-adjacent people wandering their halls. There's an entire page on their site dedicated to neuroscience, you ignoramus.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/brain-research/

These people are in league with bioethicists who say shit like this:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.12496

Advancements in technology and globalization create many opportunities. Among them are not only greater opportunities to enhance our capacities for cognition, but also to use those enhanced capacities to cause “ultimate harm,” which is an event or series of events that brings about either the annihilation of humanity or a condition of living that is so poor that life is not worthwhile.1 Global in scope, ultimate harm is characterized by high rates of death, and, for those that survive, immense suffering. Examples of potential catalysts of ultimate harm are familiar and include global warming, terrorists, and short‐sighted scientists unleashing a plague. Some argue that as cognitive enhancement increases in scope and availability, the potential for ultimate harm is greater, especially when conjoined with some of the possible catalysts of ultimate harm.2 But an event or series of events doesn’t have to be caused by an agent or agents to be ultimate harm. A large meteor or supernova could also bring about ultimate harm. Persson and Savulescu claim that in order to prevent the greater possibility of ultimate harm, it is necessary for humans to be morally enhanced.3 More specifically, it is necessary to morally bioenhance the population in order to prevent ultimate harm. Moral bioenhancement is the potential practice of influencing a person’s moral behavior by way of biological intervention upon their moral attitudes, motivations, or dispositions. The technology that may permit moral bioenhancement is on the scale between non‐existent and nascent, but common examples of potential interventions include infusing water supplies with pharmaceuticals that enhance empathy or altruism or otherwise intervening on a person’s emotions or motivations, in an attempt to influence the person’s moral behavior.

They really, really want the ability to pump the communitarian equity and inclusion juice straight into people's heads. They're not even fucking joking with that. Have you actually read Klaus Schwab's books? I have. From the perspective of Davos, our societies have become too complex to maintain an actual diverse marketplace of ideas, which creates strife and unnecessary additional complexity for the managerial class, for the administrative state. So, the next step in governance, clearly, is to simplify the people. Pacify them with the coom-consoom cycle. Dumb down their media to a Sesame Street level. Put a little Thorazine in the water supply. They don't like us having an enlightened society of informed and free citizens with agentic behavior who use the internet to help us exercise tangible political power in a way that has been denied us for so long. They don't want that. They want braindead, sedated slaves.


Direct link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gNJ4Q9jqL8A
-------------------------------------------------------------

