We accidentally proved the opposite conclusion from what our "funding" was trying to have us prove, so let's put some spin on it to try to save ourselves

To question science is the foundation of scientific method itself. Scientists who are not questioning science are not even scientists

-------------------------------------------------------------
Science is a tool, like a hammer, wrench, or screw driver. Have you ever advised anyone to study a hammer to improve their carpentry skills? Perhaps contemplating a wrench will make you a better mechanic.

Science is information derived by the unbiased application of the "scientific method". A process where a theory is postulated, and then physical experiments are conducted in an effort to invalidate the theory. The results of said experiments must be physically observable.

>Simulations
>Stats
>Math

These things are not substitutes for strict adherence to the scientific method. They can be used to analyze the information obtained, but they can never replace actual physical experimentation.

Now if you are doing anything other than that and calling it "science", it is akin to painting with a hammer or welding with a wrench...

Studies which seek to support a theory are not science, nor are they scientific. Experiments that produce the desired outcome fundamentally invalidate any claims of "science" and are mere quackery. This quackery is 99.9% of what you believe to be science today
-------------------------------------------------------------

