Prompted by French fur-trader Pierre-Charles Le Sueur's 1700 report of caves containing saltpeter (potassium nitrate) along the Minnesota shore of Lake Pepin, this study investigated the concentration of nitrate in cave sediments along the Mississippi River bluffs in Minnesota and to a lesser extent the entire Upper Mississippi Valley. Elevated concentrations of nitrate, up to 3.5 percent dry weight of sediment, were found in a wide variety of rock voids. These sediment nitrate concentrations are comparable to the nitrate accumulations found in Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, an historical nineteenth-century saltpeter mining locality, which range up to 4 percent. This is enough to show that Le Sueur's claim of finding saltpeter (more likely, a saltpeter precursor, such as calcium nitrate) in Minnesota caves, for making gunpowder in the wilderness , is credible, but other considerations raise serious doubts. In any case this is the earliest report of cave saltpeter from North America...

Arguably the most important Western source on the early history of gunpowder technology is the late thirteenth century manuscript, Das Fuerwerkbuch. When it was translated into English in 2000, it contained a commentary on the chemistry of many of the formulations given. These were largely dismissed as useless alchemical nonsense which could not work. Although some mysteries remain, much of the formulation can be understood either as contemporary 'best practice' or by comparison with modern pyrotechnic and explosive knowledge. This paper re-examines the underlying chemistry and demonstrates some surprising innovations anticipating much later claims. Note An extended and peer reviewed copy of this paper was published in ICON Vol 21, 2015 available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/24721698?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

This thesis re-appraises how the creation and inclusion of niter theories and salt principles played into the reformation of early modern scientific philosophies, suggesting that the adoption of these theories by major figures of the period calls for closer attention by historians of science. In particular, it raises the question of why and how such a humble, earthly mineral took on a supernatural role and became a staple in some of the leading scientific philosophies of the early modern era. I show that salt, or more specifically saltpeter, would not have assumed this identity without the growing importance and popularity accorded to gunpowder weapons beginning in the Renaissance. It was the hermetic alchemist, Paracelsus, who first developed a metaphysical notion of saltpeter and incorporated it into his natural cosmology. Historians of science, such as Allen Debus, Walter Pagel, and Henry Guerlac, have discussed Paraclesus’ first claim to treatment of niter theories and their association with the observed effects of gunpowder. However, I argue that additional evidence, found in Paracelsus’ writings, is needed to further demonstrate this historical connection and to identify differences in the understanding of Paracelsus’ conception and employment of salt as one of three principles of matter, alongside sulfur and mercury, together forming his celebrated tria prima. An examination of the parallel rise of gunpowder weapons and the utilization of saltpeter as their principle source of power showcases the philosophical links between science and emerging technologies in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The transition of saltpeter from a primary component in a technological instrument to a conceptual manifestation of the fundamental structure of reality reflects an epistemological transfer of concepts from craft knowledge to metaphysical and philosophical beliefs. Such narratives may help us understand the development of early modern natural philosophers’ beliefs about causality, agency, and creation.

Saltpetre in medieval gunpowder; Calcium or Potassium Nitrate? Until recently, it has been accepted that the formulation of gunpowder has always been based on variable mixtures of charcoal, sulphur and potassium nitrate. This has recently been challenged. It has been asserted that early gunpowder was based on lime saltpetre that is calcium nitrate. This paper examines that claim.

In 2001 The Arms and Armour Society sponsored a translation of Das Feuerwerkbuch. (FWB) This manuscript contains the earliest (Western) references to gunpowder. The editorial comment of the translation contained the unsubstantiated assertion that, since certain processes were not specifically mentioned in the text, they were not carried out and that consequently the nitrate of medieval gunpowder was calcium based. This has been shown to be incorrect but the concept seems to have taken root among some historians unable to understand the clear technical evidence in the manuscript.ii Although the processes described in the FWB were evidently capable of delivering substantially pure potassium nitrate, there remains a possibility that some calcium (or magnesium) nitrate could remain as a minor impurity sufficient to affect the quality of the gunpowder. This present paper gives evidence that such contamination was sometimes (but not always) present but was neutralised during the manufacturing process.

yes to you