
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 08/22/23(Tue)08:30:11 No.95524498▶>>95524532 >>95524611
>>95524106>>95524396
is not like 264 could not save it. with better encodes you can get a lot more quality on the same size. hardware encode is the laziest way to process shit. very inefficient in terms of quality.

it get a lot worse since most people choose the higher quality option in streaming sites because low ones are trash. a good encode at 720p 2300kbps or 1080p 300kbps can do wonders. A lot better than those hevc or AV1 at 6000.

a minute of buffer for frame comparison should give a big boost. but gpu manufacturers don't care. and streamers either. realtime fucked everything.

also youtube should reencode in a better way or at least offer the option to accept the upload of videos with better encode presets.
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
pixDAIZ !!6i8Hydtfk+n 08/22/23(Tue)08:22:22 No.95524396▶>>95524431 >>95524498
File: NVENC-video-performance-c(...).png (1.13 MB, 1920x1080)
1.13 MB
>>95524199
I think it's worse than that
>adopt ARM to ensure planned obsolescence
>"oh gee sorry guys we can't stream AV1 video to your shitbox despite it being 80% smaller than an H264 video stream, hh-ha-haha."
>"I guess we'll just have to raise our prices!"
-------------------------------------------------------------

