
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 06/24/23(Sat)02:48:18 No.35111778▶>>35111825 >>35113096 >>35113400 >>35113523 >>35113552 >>35113878
File: 1612422652001.gif (1.88 MB, 305x242)
1.88 MB
>>35111548

Masks are only effective if proper usage guidelines are strictly followed. If not, they increase chance of infection — and the spread.
Real life isn't a lab. There's no indication masks have mitigated anything.
Even more so with cloth.


This Covid virus is between 60-140Nm.
Meanwhile, the Flu is 80-120Nm.

Dia Paper mask porosity is between 50,000-60,000Nm. Dia Min.
Pore area = 1,963,493,750 Sq. Nm
Max. Virus area = 15,393.791 Sq. Nm
That's a Min. of 127,551 individual virus side by side, at once through 1 single pore of your mask!

The virus is between 60-140Nm.
Disposable surgical mask porosity is between 50,000-60,000Nm. Dia Min.
Pore area = 1,963,493,750 Sq. Nm
Max. Virus area = 15,393.791 Sq. Nm
That's a Min. of 127,551 individual virus could fit through each pore at once.
Like throwing BB's at a chain fence.


Cloth masks - 80,000-500,000 Nm.

Surgical - 3 layers Designed for >300Nm -- 200Nm is the smallest possible by using diffusion and electrostatic attraction. However, surgical masks are non-fitted, leaving obvious massive gaps.
Outer layer (Spunbond PP) - 20,000-100,000Nm. PFE = 6-10%
Inner layers is designed to absorb moisture from exhalation.
Middle layer (Meltblown PP) - 1,000-10,000Nm PFE = 19-33%
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 06/24/23(Sat)08:44:12 No.35114307▶>>35114607 >>35117956
>>35114260
They know they're full of shit.
They know they fully bought into a lie.

But in today's society they see being wrong or making a mistake as a sin; a character flaw; a moral failure. They don't see it as a part of life and growth.

They've always enjoyed simply parroting whatever the glowing screen tells them because it gives them an undue sense of superiority. Plus they get to match consensus and feel like they're part of the "informed" collective.

All of this is only further compounded by how fiercely they fought with others during those times. To admit they may have been mistaken would mean those they argued with may have been right.
So, the bullshit and denial continues on
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 06/24/23(Sat)11:58:10 No.35115569▶>>35117267
File: Maskss.webm (1.57 MB, 1600x900)
1.57 MB
>>35115184
No, what you're literally talking about is compliance for the sake of compliance so some people can maintain an illusion.

The only thing you've shown is purely anecdotal and can 100% be attributed to a coincidence or any other countless factors.
As I've already said, correlation does NOT mean causation. Nowhere in what you've shown does it demonstrate a direct correlation, it literally only assumes one.
That's not "hard data;" it's seeking confirmation bias.

You just continue to move the goalposts and present a single anecdotal paper as if it were indicative of some universal truth.

Here, I'll do the same shit now with video related.
We see in many cases mask requirements cause a dramatic increase.

tHaT'S hArD fActS!

It's fucking dumb
-------------------------------------------------------------

