
-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous (ID: n0LFqiUZ)  05/10/23(Wed)14:05:39 No.426502877▶>>426502901
They are specialised in a use of force and disguising that it is a form of force, and exclusively prioritise using this force to make all other forms of force seem immoral, whilst using this form of force which most others find innately immoral and distasteful to end up using all these other forms of force anyway, usually against those who see through the trick. The main requirement is being a minority and therefore having a population to turn against itself.

Additionally, they are also a unique group type that, whilst theoretically being an already confusing mix of "voluntary" religion (this being a relatively new concept however) and "involuntary" ethnicity - are actually an OPT-IN group. Those born within the group with a natural variation of tendencies which lean them towards having a moral issue with using the aforementioned form of "subtle force" end up on aggregate causing these traits to generationally/evolutionarily leave the group by marrying outside of it, and those from outside the group with these traits will "OPT-IN" and marry into the group. It is basically self-selecting sociopathy, completely (on a multi-generational scale) "voluntary", and not even some genetic destiny - though obviously over time the genetics tend to reinforce it - hidden beneath the veil of it being an "involuntary" group, this hiding being a good example of the subtle type of force (manipulation) which is permitted, because other groups tend not to use this type of force anyway. The concept of it being "dishonourable" and if you insist on fighting, conquering etc, it being out in the open is alien to people like that in the grand scheme, and ironically will use it only in the micro, as -part- of this stealth force. Their greatest asset is not pure intelligence (as unbiased studies using original IQ tests tend to place them similar or less than other groups, and even then this is with handpicked cohorts) but their ability to use it in service of things others would find immoral.
>>
 Anonymous (ID: n0LFqiUZ)  05/10/23(Wed)14:06:14 No.426502901▶
>>426502877
The point of difference is not intelligence, the point of difference is moral. Is a man who uses his intelligence to carefully and secretly abduct and rape a child "more intelligent" than a man who chooses not to? Or did one simply refrain from using his intelligence to perform this act? If two groups with similar intellectual capacities spend their time doing completely different things, the results will be different. You can see this in how asians are so academically competent yet contribute far less percentage wise to genuine creative things - because they spend 4x more time studying than the average westerner, yet these school-obsessed types likely in real objective terms could easily matched in the brain by some council estate poorfag recluse dropout in britain, if both faced a set of tasks they similarly cared about in a vacuum.

For the longest time, survival, open violent war and "honour" were the priorities for humans, and it is pretty clear which group won that contest. The contest has now simply changed, and if the contest changes to essentially be "won" by the "greatest sicko with the least regard for morality" then many people capable of winning and scheming will simply refrain from taking part, and yes, end up being partially damaged by this on a physical sense, but, and this is the point, this desire to be moral is only partially pathological. The other part is innate, it is spiritual, it is the recognition that this particular
iteration of material plane is NOT all that is and ever will be, and that entreating with entropy for a temporary bonus is in fact, in the true long run, not actually the most intelligent thing to do
-------------------------------------------------------------

