
-------------------------------------------------------------
Reality measurement Anonymous 08/28/23(Mon)23:36:01 No.35741073▶>>35741516
At some point while watching Steins;Gate,
I became captivated by the concept of the divergence meter.

From that I had an idea.
What if one could measure the state of the current observable reality/worldline? And what if one could then determine the state of one's ideal reality/worldline? The device could then possibly display a difference between the two states, as a percentage. In that way, one would get an idea of how far apart they are.

100% would mean the states are completely different,
while 0% would mean that the states are the same.
Simple enough concept right? It could display fractional.

I have seen a lot of Bashar's videos and think a lot of the notions mentioned make a lot of sense. Apparently one is always shifting as that is how time works. He also says that the state of being determines the circumstances. Maybe one just needs to somehow measure one's own state of being then to determine the current state of reality. He also talks about one's frequency or vibration. So maybe we can measure that. In my view, each individual being has their own view of reality, so measuring one's own state of being might then make sense. The collective reality which we share might be considered the worldline, each of us has a different view of it but it has the same kinda things in it seemingly. So our individual realities then might be subsets of this collective reality or worldline.

The issue arises when attempting to make the actual measurement. In what way do we approach this? In the Titor postings, gravitational variation is seemingly the way to measure a worldline. This could be a thing since gravity affects spacetime. I thought of another potential way to measure the state of observable reality and that is to use radionics devices. Although I'm not sure what the best way to go about it may be, as there can be many ways to do this.
>>
 Anonymous 08/29/23(Tue)00:02:52 No.35741270▶
Maybe state of being can be measured like EEG or EKG?
https://goldenmean.info/brainheart/
Or something similar
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 08/29/23(Tue)00:41:43 No.35741530▶
Using a radionics device is a skill, like scrying, so one can become better at it over time. Using a radionics device, one can basically scry for numbers, like by using a rubbing plate and some dials. When turning the dial, eventually one can, while rubbing the plate, get a stick reaction on a certain number, which one then takes into the value, then one just goes for the next and so on until the numerical value is substantial enough

Focusing on the state while doing this, one could potentially get the number of a frequency representing said state, which could then be used as a value that's fed into something like the divergence meter. One can scry both current and desired states in this way, but it might not be infallible, especially to a beginner. This could be used for getting placeholder values to begin with, as its difficult (if possible) to find out if these values are actually accurate for said states.
-------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous 08/29/23(Tue)01:27:21 No.35741926▶
Gravitational sensors exist now;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerometer
http://www.designtest.com/images/patents/5479616_Capacitive_based_gravity_sensor.pdf
As it says in the wiki article;
>When two or more accelerometers are coordinated with one another, they can measure differences in proper acceleration, particularly gravity, over their separation in space—that is, the gradient of the gravitational field
>MEMS accelerometers are increasingly present in portable electronic devices and video-game controllers, to detect changes in the positions of these devices
-------------------------------------------------------------

