The appeal to the unity of good and evil may actually be a ploy by the evil side to prevent good from confronting them (evil). At the same time, they may be trying to convince people that good is the wrong people masquerading as righteous.

In other words, it could be a sophistry to keep us earthlings in the dark about the actual current situation on earth.

The bad side benefits from the spread of such information, because they will not be denounced for it.

At the same time, it can make people think of the good side as "fools bound by a sense of conflict.

Let me give you a simple, familiar example.

Suppose there was a bully at elementary school.

Let's say that boy A, a powerful bully, bullies boy B, a literary boy.

Then C comes in and stops A from bullying B.

Then, a teacher D comes along.

Teacher D stops A and C.

When C says, "A was bullying B," teacher D says, "There must have been anger in you, too. That is what is pouring fire into the conflict. Aren't you just putting on the mask of justice?" And he chides C.

Next teacher D says, "Please get along with both of us. Let's shake hands and be done with it." 

What would happen if this were to happen?

In the end, A's bullying behavior will go unchecked, and A will most likely continue to bully B.

And C will be blamed and will not be allowed to stop what A is doing.

In the future, bullying and crimes by A and other bullies will be rampant in that school.

In fact, have you ever had this kind of experience?　

Or have you seen someone around you having these experiences?

There are many people like teacher D who, if there is bullying, instead of stopping the person who is the aggressor, will say that the victim may have had problems as well.

In other words, even if the bully or someone who took action to stop the bullying points out the problem, they are blamed for disturbing the harmony of the organization and inconveniencing the people in that organization.

Isn't this how bullying is now rampant without blame, both at the small organizational level and at the global level?

----------------------------------------------------------

Above text was inspired by the insights of "To Our Brothers in the Universe" and I devised the text to make it more universal and I have tried to make it more universal.

I thank "To Our Brothers in the Universe".

(However, I don't agree with all of his information except for this insight.) 

----------------------------------------------------------

By the way, I have had the experience of confronting A, as B, for his problematic behavior at my former place of employment.

A was a habitual offender of threats, verbal abuse, and violence.

I had heard about what he had done at my former workplace, and there were also accusations of his history of violence, etc. on the Internet.

In fact, as A's new trainer, I taught A how to do his job, and once during this process, he became violent with me. A few hours later he cooled down a bit and apologized to me, so we kept it between us as a strict warning. However, after he finished his training period for new employees, he became violent to other people, and again to me.

I decided that A and I, B, could not solve this problem alone.

Therefore, I consulted my boss D.

As a result, my boss D gave me a response similar to teacher D regarding A's problematic behavior.

Boss D said to me.

'You two get along fine.”

However, A never showed any remorse or attitude toward us, so I repeatedly asked my supervisor D to take the next actions.

After much effort, Boss D said to me, ”I will contact the company he belongs to so that some sort of disciplinary action will be taken against A."

But the company to which A belonged never contacted my company.

This is because my boss D lied to me. He did not contact the company to which A belonged.

Because, and this is my guess (and I have heard such rumors from other trusted employees as well), Boss D was receiving bribes from the company A belonged to. 

About ten days after this incident, A resigned from the company.

However, I took issue with Boss D's response and filed charges.

Then, next, Boss D and the president conspired to force my resignation.

(That is, it is conceivable that my boss D and the president of my company could both have received bribes from the company to which A belongs.)

However, I told the labor inspector's office everything and made them settle all the wrongdoings they had committed against me.

(Japanese labor inspectors, like police officers, can arrest criminals who are committing illegal acts.)

But the president and D etc, of this company are probably definitely still cheating today. So I have no doubt in my mind that many employees are still suffering as usual.