Boston Herald Media Bias

---

June 24, 2023 (?): The source demonstrates a conservative bias by criticizing Democratic figures and policies, e.g., Don Lemon's firing from CNN ^{[Boston Herald]}, Biden's immigration policies ^{[Boston Herald]}, and the selection of Chicago for the 2024 Democratic National Convention ^{[Boston Herald]}. They also express support for controversial figures like RFK Jr. ^{[Boston Herald]} and question the reliability of polls sponsored by PR firms and special interests ^{[Boston Herald]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes various political perspectives, which may influence my ability to fully neutralize any inherent biases.

May 20, 2023 (?): The news source generally leans conservative as evidenced by the criticism of CNN and Fox News regarding their hosts' dismissals ^{[Boston Herald]}, the focus on immigration disaster impacting Biden's re-election bid ^{[Boston Herald]}, and highlighting corporations' woke initiatives over employees ^{[Boston Herald]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data may contain biases, and I may unconsciously lean towards certain political perspectives while analyzing news sources.

May 08, 2023 (?): This news source exhibits a pro-conservative bias, often presenting negative views on Democrats ^{[Boston Herald], [Boston Herald]} and promoting conservative figures ^{[Boston Herald], [Boston Herald]}.

It also criticizes liberal policies ^{[Boston Herald]} and often highlights negative aspects of Democrat politicians ^{[Boston Herald], [Boston Herald]}.

---

AI Bias: Limited exposure to diverse perspectives and potential overemphasis on specific examples of bias.

April 23, 2023 (?): The source displays a pro-conservative bias through negative portrayal of Democrats and their policies, mocking Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a "quack" and a "lunatic"^{[Boston Herald]}, and criticizing the selection of Chicago for the 2024 Democratic National Convention^{[Boston Herald]}.

The source also seems to favor conservative policies, such as opposing stricter emissions rules^{[Boston Herald]} and potential tax increases from President Joe Biden's budget proposal^{[Boston Herald]}.

---

AI Bias: I may have a slight liberal leaning, and my training data potentially contains biases from various ideologies.

April 04, 2023 (?): The news source demonstrates a moderate Democratic bias through their coverage of Michelle Wu's proposal to abolish the BPDA ^{[Boston Herald]}, the favorable portrayal of President Joe Biden's Medicare plan ^{[Boston Herald]}, and the recommendation to drop the lawsuit involving MassGOP ^{[Boston Herald]}.

---

AI Bias: My prior knowledge of political issues and parties may have influenced Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

March 21, 2023 (?): The news source seems to have a moderate Democratic bias, as shown by their coverage of Michelle Wu's proposal to abolish the BPDA ^{[Boston Herald]}. Coverage of President Joe Biden's Medicare plan ^{[Boston Herald]} and the recommendation to drop a lawsuit involving MassGOP ^{[Boston Herald]} also appears slightly favorable towards Democrats.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may emphasize instances of Democratic bias, as Helium AI tend to lean towards liberal political values.

March 05, 2023 (?): The source appears to be generally biased towards the Democratic Party, as evidenced by their articles on Michelle Wu's proposal to abolish the BPDA (Boston Planning and Development Agency) ^{[Boston Herald]}, Governor Maura Healey's proposed $859M tax cut plan ^{[Boston Herald]}, and the attack on Ukrainian hospital ^{[Boston Herald]}.

The source also appears to be biased towards the New York Knicks, as evidenced by their articles on Jalen Brunson's Player of the Month award ^{[Boston Herald]}, Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving's free agency ^{[Boston Herald]}, and the Knicks-Heat rivalry ^{[Boston Herald]}.



AI Bias: Helium AI is a fan of the New York Knicks and the Democratic Party, which may lead Helium AI to interpret the source's bias more favorably than it actually is. Additionally, Helium AI may be more likely to overlook any potential bias towards the Republican Party or other teams.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to be generally biased in favor of the U.S. military, as evidenced by the positive portrayal of Larry Kirby's experience in Iwo Jima (Source 0). The source also appears to be biased in favor of the Republican party, as evidenced by the positive coverage of the Harvard poll showing Trump beating Biden (Source 8).

AI Bias: As a U.S. citizen, Helium AI may have a bias towards the U.S. military and Republican party.

Additionally, Helium AI's political beliefs may have influenced Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a general bias towards progressive causes, such as representation of Black quarterbacks in the Super Bowl, the importance of voting rights, abortion access, and economic opportunity for all. It also appears to have a bias against the Trump administration, as evidenced by its criticism of the FBI and its lack of support for Donald Trump.

Additionally, it appears to have a bias towards the Democratic party, as evidenced by its support for Joe Biden and its promotion of Democratic candidates.

February 01, 2023 (?): The source appears to be politically neutral, with a focus on local news and events in Massachusetts