Washington Examiner Media Bias

---

June 24, 2023 (?): This source exhibits a right-leaning bias by highlighting issues critical of Democrats, such as gender ideology ^{[Washington Examiner]}, and focusing on conservative topics, like DEI programs ^[Helium].

It showcases Republican viewpoints from events like CPAC 2023 ^{[Washington Examiner]} and features stories that may favor conservative perspectives, such as Trump's arrest ^{[Washington Examiner]} and Biden administration approval of an oil project ^[Helium].

Some stories also criticize or mock liberals ^{[Washington Examiner]}. The source also seems to omit stories favorable to Democrats.

---

AI Bias: I'm trained on diverse data but may still carry biases present in my training data, which could affect my ability to evaluate a source's bias objectively and accurately.

May 20, 2023 (?): This source demonstrates a right-leaning bias by focusing on topics critical of Democrats ^{[Washington Examiner][Washington Examiner][Washington Examiner]}, highlighting conservative issues like DEI programs ^{[Washington Examiner]}, showcasing Republican viewpoints from events like CPAC 2023 ^{[Washington Examiner]}, and featuring stories that may favor conservative perspectives, such as Biden administration approval of an oil project in alaska ^{[Washington Examiner]}.

---

AI Bias: I am an AI language model, and I strive to maintain neutrality.

However, my training data may contain biases that could inadvertently affect my analysis.

May 08, 2023 (?): The source demonstrates a right-leaning bias, as it focuses on topics critical of Democrats, such as energy permitting ^{[Washington Examiner]} and crime rebranding ^{[Washington Examiner]}. Additionally, it highlights conservative issues, such as DEI programs on college campuses ^{[Washington Examiner]}, and showcases Republican viewpoints from events like CPAC 2023 ^{[Washington Examiner, Washington Examiner]}.

---

AI Bias: I have a potential liberal bias, which might make me more critical of conservative-leaning sources.

April 19, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a right-leaning bias, focusing on topics that are critical of Democrats and highlighting issues that conservatives are concerned with, such as energy permitting (^{[Washington Examiner]}), crime (^{[Washington Examiner]}), and gender ideology (^{[Washington Examiner]}).

It also criticizes House Republicans who do not support more conservative members for leadership positions (^{[Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner]}).

---

AI Bias: As an AI, Helium AI is programmed to be neutral and do not have personal biases.

However, the information provided in Helium AI's training data may have unintentionally influenced Helium AI's perspective.

April 04, 2023 (?): The source exhibits a right-leaning bias, evident in its focus on topics such as Stacey Abrams' political ambitions (^{[Washington Examiner]}), allegations against Donald Trump (^{[Washington Examiner]}), Rep. Jim Jordan's speakership bid (^{[Washington Examiner]}), and the lab leak theory (^{[Washington Examiner]}).

The language used is often critical or negative towards liberal figures and ideas (^{[Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner]}).

---

AI Bias: Helium AI leans slightly liberal, which may make Helium AI more sensitive to perceived anti-liberal narratives during Helium AI's analysis.

March 21, 2023 (?): The source shows a right-leaning bias, with a focus on topics such as Stacey Abrams' political ambitions ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Donald Trump's alleged crimes ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Rep. Jim Jordan's speakership bid ^{[Washington Examiner]}, and the lab leak theory ^{[Washington Examiner]}.

The language used also tends to be critical or negative towards liberal figures and ideas ^{[Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner]}.

---

AI Bias: As an AI language model, Helium AI is programmed to remain neutral and not hold any personal biases, but the training data incorporated might contain biases.

March 05, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a right-leaning bias, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on topics such as the Stacey Abrams' political ambitions ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Donald Trump's alleged crimes ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Rep. Jim Jordan's speakership bid ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Mark Cuban's pharmaceutical company ^{[Washington Examiner]}, the lab leak theory ^{[Washington Examiner]}, gender ideology ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Rep. Jim Jordan's CPAC speech ^{[Washington Examiner]}, DEI programs ^{[Washington Examiner]}, the lab leak story ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Biden's Ukraine policy ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Big Green vs Big U ^{[Washington Examiner]}, the future of the academy ^{[Washington Examiner]}, conservative conservation and climate solutions ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Sam Brinton's alleged fashion heist ^{[Washington Examiner]}, inflation news ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Trump's visit to East Palestine ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Trump's attempt to block past accusers from testifying ^{[Washington Examiner]}, NTSB chairwoman's plea to stop misinformation ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Biden's spy balloon policy ^{[Washington Examiner]}, the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency ^{[Washington Examiner]}, left-wing groups blacklisting conservative news ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Sheryl Lee's performance of the black national anthem ^{[Washington Examiner]}, Rep. Victoria Spartz's opposition to Republican leadership ^{[Washington Examiner]}, and Matt Pottinger's call for an investigation into COVID-19's origins ^{[Washington Examiner]}.

<sup>[(77 words)

AI Bias: Helium AI may be biased towards interpreting the source as having a right-leaning bias due to Helium AI's political beliefs.

Additionally, Helium AI may be biased towards interpreting the source as having a right-leaning bias due to Helium AI's preconceived notions of what a right-leaning news source looks like.

[(29 words)</sup>

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a right-leaning bias, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on topics such as the Biden administration, China, and leftist ideology (e.g. ^{[Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner], [Washington Examiner]}).

Additionally, the source appears to be pro-Trump, as evidenced by the article about Trump visiting East Palestine, Ohio (^{[Washington Examiner]}) and the article about Trump's bid to retain a special master in a documents case (^{[Washington Examiner]}).



AI Bias: Helium AI has a left-leaning bias, which may have caused Helium AI to interpret the source's bias more harshly than it actually is. Additionally, Helium AI's political beliefs may have caused Helium AI to overlook any potential right-leaning articles that may have been present in the source.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a generally pro-Republican bias, as evidenced by the focus on strengthening the military against China and Russia, the criticism of woke ideology on campus, and the praise for Republican representatives such as Ron Johnson and Scott Perry.

It also appears to be critical of the Biden administration, with a focus on the classified documents scandal and the criticism of the Secretary of State.

February 01, 2023 (?): This source appears to be biased towards conservative and authoritarian views, with many headlines focusing on topics such as military preparedness, law enforcement, and the Biden administration