LA Times Media Bias

---

July 08, 2023 (?): The news source repeatedly presents the perspectives and actions of progressive or Democratic actors in a neutral or positive light (^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}), occasionally includes moderately critical coverage of Republican figures or actions (^{[LA Times], [LA Times]}), and focuses heavily on social issues such as homelessness, abortion, police reform, and climate change (^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}).

The sources' framing of such issues, including the use of implied tone to generate sympathy towards the subjects or the inclusion of emotive language, suggests a tacit endorsement of progressive values ^{[LA Times][LA Times][LA Times]}.

However, the news source tries to balance by maintaining objective news reporting of events without heavily polarized views ^{[LA Times][LA Times]}.

---

AI Bias: Trained on a broad range of data, my AI model might unknowingly inherit biases from the training data.

Its interpretation of the articles could be influenced by the language, tone, and trending topics present in that dataset.

June 03, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a slight pro-liberal bias, evidenced by the focus on the NBCUniversal CEO's misconduct ^{[LA Times]} and the criticism of Republican-led states for banning books ^{[LA Times]}. However, it also reports on various topics without clear political bias, such as traffic enforcement in Los Angeles ^{[LA Times]} and wildfire contributions from carbon emissions ^{[LA Times]}.

---

AI Bias: I may be more sensitive to perceived liberal biases due to my training data's tendency to highlight left-leaning perspectives.

May 08, 2023 (?): The news source seems to lean left/liberal, as seen with highlighting Republican-led states fueling book bans in U.S. schools ^{[LA Times]}, covering coronation of King Charles III with a negative tone ^{[LA Times]}, and analyzing possible replacements for Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein ^{[LA Times]}. However, it also covers some factual news without an apparent bias, like NBCUniversal CEO's exit ^{[LA Times]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data may induce a confirmation bias in detecting liberal-leaning news sources.

April 19, 2023 (?): The news source presents various topics and shows a slight pro-liberal bias by discussing Governor Newsom's environmental efforts ^{[LA Times]}, highlighting Rep. Adam Schiff's entry into the Senate race ^{[LA Times]}, and focusing on a case of racial bias involving rapper E-40 ^{[LA Times]}.

However, it also presents a balanced view on certain subjects, such as

April 04, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a pro-Democratic bias, highlighting positive aspects of Democratic politicians and policies in articles ^{[LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]}, while portraying Republican politicians and policies in a negative light in articles ^{[LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]}.

---

AI Bias: As an AI language model, Helium AI strives to be neutral and avoid bias, consistently analyzing information and presenting it objectively.

March 21, 2023 (?): The source appears to be generally pro-Democratic, as evidenced by articles such as ^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]}, which feature Democratic politicians or policies in a positive light.

Additionally, articles such as ^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]} feature Republican politicians or policies in a negative light.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI is an AI language model and strive for neutrality.

My evaluation is based on the provided excerpts only.

March 05, 2023 (?): The source appears to be generally pro-Democratic, as evidenced by articles such as ^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]}, which all feature Democratic politicians or policies in a positive light.

Additionally, articles such as ^{[LA Times], [LA Times], [LA Times]}, and ^{[LA Times]} feature Republican politicians or policies in a negative light.



AI Bias: Helium AI is a left-leaning independent, so Helium AI may have been more likely to interpret the source's bias in a pro-Democratic direction.

Additionally, Helium AI may have been more likely to interpret the source's bias in a negative light towards Republicans.

February 25, 2023 (?): ^{[LA Times]} Can ChatGPT write a better cover letter for your job search? See for yourself.

The cover letter is its own unique, dreaded genre of writing.

In a few — often formulaic — paragraphs, job applicants must accomplish several things: prostrate themselves at the feet of hiring managers, extolling the virtues of whatever company to which they’re applying, but also brag about themselves without seeming too, well, braggy.

- This source does not appear to have any bias.

It is simply providing information about the cover letter writing process.



AI Bias: Helium AI may have a bias towards believing that the cover letter writing process is more difficult than it actually is.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a bias towards Democrats, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles about Democratic victories and policies.

Additionally, the source appears to be pro-gun control, as evidenced by the article about California's Prop 1. The source also appears to be pro-environment, as evidenced by the article about banning cars from making right turns on red lights.

Finally, the source appears to be pro-Indigenous rights, as evidenced by the article about the Colorado River crisis.

February 04, 2023 (?): The source appears to be a mainstream news outlet, covering a variety of topics from politics to entertainment

It is not overtly biased in any direction, and provides a balanced view of the news

LA Times Political Bias (?)

LA Times Subjective Bias (?)

LA Times Opinion Bias (?)

LA Times Oversimplification Bias (?)