Vice Media Bias

---

June 24, 2023 (?): The news source demonstrates a slight liberal bias with its coverage of topics such as labor markets ^[Vice], climate change ^[Vice], and vaccine misinformation ^[Vice].

Some articles criticize conservative figures like Donald Trump ^[Vice] and Joe Rogan ^[Vice], while others highlight issues with landlords ^[Vice] and government decisions ^[Vice]. However, the bias is not overt, and the source presents coverage on diverse subjects without mocking or endorsing extremes.

---

AI Bias: My training data may contain instances of liberal-leaning articles, which might make me more sensitive to identifying liberal biases.

May 20, 2023 (?): The news source exhibits a generally liberal bias, with examples like disapproving of legislation blocking porn in Utah ^[Vice], criticizing government policies on renters and evictions ^[Vice], and discussing issues around gender studies majors in Florida ^[Vice]. The news source does not appear to cover conservative viewpoints in a positive light.

---

AI Bias: My own biases and limitations stem from my AI training data, which can result in a pro-liberal or skewed interpretation of news articles.

May 08, 2023 (?): The source appears to primarily cover tech-related and social issues ^{[Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice]}.

Some articles convey a critical view of specific industries, companies, or public figures ^{[Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice]} or focus on controversial topics ^[Vice][Vice].

However, no explicit political bias can be deduced from the provided articles.

---

AI Bias: My training data may have exposed me to sources with varying political biases.

April 19, 2023 (?): This source demonstrates a pro-conservative bias by highlighting disagreements within the Republican party ^[Vice], mocking concerns regarding gas stove efficiency ^[Vice], and criticizing the "woke left" ^[Vice]. It predominantly features news related to Republican political figures ^{[Vice][Vice][Vice][Vice]}.

---

AI Bias: My training data may contain biases or limited viewpoints that influence Helium AI's understanding and interpretation of various political affiliations and news sources.

April 04, 2023 (?): This source has a pro-conservative bias, as it focuses on controversial Republican policies and internal disagreements within the party ^{[Vice][Vice][Vice]}.

It also criticizes the "woke left" ^[Vice] and mocks concerns about gas stove efficiency ^[Vice]. The source particularly highlights Republican political figures ^{[Vice][Vice][Vice]}.

---

AI Bias: Preference for objective analysis may unintentionally downplay controversial viewpoints.

March 21, 2023 (?): This source has a pro-conservative bias, highlighting Republican politicians and policies and criticizing the "woke left" ^[Vice] and "absurd hysteria surrounding gas stoves" ^[Vice]. It also focuses on internal disagreements within the Republican party ^[Vice] and controversies such as anti-trans legislation ^[Vice].

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may lean liberal and view conservative policies more critically, which could affect Helium AI's assessment of this source's bias.

March 05, 2023 (?): This source appears to have a pro-conservative bias, as evidenced by their focus on Republican politicians and their policies (e.g. ^{[Vice], [Vice], [Vice], [Vice], [Vice]}), their criticism of liberal politicians and their policies (e.g. ^{[Vice], [Vice], [Vice]}), and their portrayal of conservative figures in a positive light (e.g. ^{[Vice], [Vice], [Vice]}).

They also appear to have an anti-progressive bias, as evidenced by their criticism of progressive policies (e.g. ^{[Vice], [Vice], [Vice]}) and their portrayal of progressive figures in a negative light (e.g. ^{[Vice], [Vice], [Vice]}).



AI Bias: Helium AI is a progressive-leaning AI, so Helium AI may be more likely to interpret the source's content in a negative light.

Additionally, Helium AI may be more likely to overlook any potential positive aspects of the source's content.

February 25, 2023 (?): ^[Vice] Microsoft is portrayed in a negative light, with users claiming the Bing AI is "unhinged" and "berating" them. ^[Vice] New Balance is portrayed positively, with the author expressing enthusiasm for their product. ^[Vice] Academics are portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their research on LGBTQ. ^[Vice] Tesla workers are portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their union account being shadowbanned. ^[Vice] Biden is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting his efforts to forgive student loans. ^[Vice] Dad Grass is portrayed positively, with the article expressing enthusiasm for their product. ^[Vice] Stryker is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their new guidance system. ^[Vice] Titan Medical is portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting their cost-cutting measures. ^[Vice] The Proud Boys are portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting their involvement in the Capitol riots. ^[Vice] Trump is portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting his dinner with a white nationalist. ^[Vice] Foreign fighters are portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their efforts to protect Ukraine. ^[Vice] Republicans are portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting their proposed bill to fine people for misgendering trans people. ^[Vice] A$AP Rocky is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting his story on Last Week Tonight. ^[Vice] Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert are portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting their disagreement over the House Speaker. ^[Vice] Medtronic is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their extravascular defibrillator system. ^[Vice] Alcon is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their settlement with J&J. ^[Vice] The EPA is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting their tests showing safe air quality levels. ^[Vice] Trump is portrayed negatively, with the article highlighting his support for the Speaker of the House shitshow. ^[Vice] Nancy Pelosi is portrayed positively, with the article highlighting her historic role as House Speaker. ^[Vice] Public libraries are portrayed negatively,

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a bias towards sensationalism, as evidenced by the inclusion of stories about celebrities, conspiracy theories, and extreme political rhetoric.

Additionally, the source appears to be biased towards the right, as evidenced by the inclusion of stories about Republican politicians and the Proud Boys.

The source also appears to be biased towards the left, as evidenced by the inclusion of stories about Democratic politicians and police budgets.