abc.net.au Media Bias

---

July 08, 2023 (?): The news source has instances of reporting that question the decisions and actions of conservative figures and parties, such as the Northern Territory Police Minister criticizing Peter Dutton and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price ^[abc.net.au], and highlighting upheaval in the Tasmanian Liberal government ^[abc.net.au]. There is also focus on strife within the Victorian Liberal Party ^[abc.net.au] and the New South Wales Liberal Party ^[abc.net.au], as well as discussions on WA's Liberal party in both a positive and negative light ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}.

However, it also contains neutral reporting on various national and international events, such as a Sydney man charged with selling national security information ^[abc.net.au], questions on regional WA blood supplies ^[abc.net.au], and Wager Group's mutiny in Russia ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}.

---

AI Bias: Trained on a vast dataset, I aim to be neutral, yet I could inadvertently lean towards a bias present in my training data, which was largely Western and English.

June 03, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a slight pro-liberal bias, as it reports on issues that concern the party and its policies, such as Peter Dutton's and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's failure to report child sexual abuse claims in Alice Springs ^[abc.net.au], and the appointment of a new WA Liberal state director with controversial history ^[abc.net.au].

However, it also includes coverage of issues related to the conservative party, such as the Hobart AFL stadium ^[abc.net.au], providing a somewhat balanced view.

---

AI Bias: My training data may have some liberal-leaning biases, possibly affecting my analysis of this source's bias.

April 19, 2023 (?): The source appears to cover various aspects of the Liberal Party, including leadership changes, factional disputes, electoral campaigns, and public policy, but also reports on controversies and internal issues ^{[abc.net.au] [abc.net.au] [abc.net.au] [abc.net.au]}.

There is a slight pro-Liberal bias, but it maintains a balanced perspective ^{[abc.net.au] [abc.net.au] [abc.net.au] [abc.net.au] [abc.net.au]}.

---

AI Bias: Limited knowledge of Australian politics may impact Helium AI's contextual understanding of these articles.

April 04, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a slight pro-Liberal bias, as it covers various instances related to the party such as leadership changes, factional disputes, electoral campaigns, and public policy ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au][abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}.

However, it also reports on controversies and internal issues, suggesting a balanced perspective ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}.

The articles focus more on the Liberal Party but do not show outright favoritism.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI may have a confirmation bias affecting Helium AI's analysis, as Helium AI tend to lean towards liberal perspectives.

March 21, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a slight pro-Liberal bias, as it covers various instances related to the party such as leadership changes ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}, factional disputes ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]}, electoral campaigns ^[abc.net.au], and public policy ^[abc.net.au]. However, it also reports on controversies ^{[abc.net.au][abc.net.au]} and internal issues ^[abc.net.au], suggesting a balanced perspective.

The articles focus more on the Liberal Party but do not show outright favoritism.

---

AI Bias: Helium AI thinks in objectivity; however, Helium AI may unintentionally lean towards neutrality in political matters.

March 05, 2023 (?): The source appears to be biased in favor of the Liberal Party in Australia, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles about the Liberal Party and its members ^{[abc.net.au-25]}.

The articles focus on the party's successes and achievements, while downplaying or ignoring any potential failures or controversies ^{[abc.net.au-25]}.

AI Bias: As a non-Australian, Helium AI may lack the cultural context and knowledge necessary to accurately assess the source's bias.

Additionally, Helium AI's political beliefs may influence Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to be biased in favor of the Liberal Party in Australia, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles about the Liberal Party and its members (e.g. ^{[abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au]}).

Additionally, the source appears to be biased against the Labor Party, as evidenced by the lack of articles about the Labor Party and its members (e.g. ^{[abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au], [abc.net.au]}).



AI Bias: Helium AI may have been biased in Helium AI's analysis due to Helium AI's political beliefs and preconceived notions about the Liberal and Labor parties.

Additionally, Helium AI may have been influenced by Helium AI's personal experiences with the Liberal and Labor parties.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a bias towards the Liberal Party, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of articles related to the Liberal Party and its members.

Additionally, the articles often focus on the positive aspects of the Liberal Party, such as their justice reform and housing affordability roles, and their attempts to quash the influence of factional powerbrokers.

This bias is further evidenced by the lack of articles related to other political parties.

February 04, 2023 (?): The source appears to be unbiased, with a focus on reporting news from the Liberal Party in Western Australia

It covers a range of topics, from corruption probes to justice reform and housing affordability