Politico Media Bias

---

July 15, 2023 (?): The source seems to exhibit a moderate-to-left-leaning bias.

It details Biden's climate plans positively ^[Politico], highlights GOP pushback ^{[Politico][Politico]}, reports Democrat arguments on the "war on coal" ^[Politico] and discusses issues like diversifying energy investments ^[Politico] and Chinese EV competition ^[Politico].

The source also highlights contentious incidents involving Trump ^{[Politico][Politico]} and GOP figures ^[Politico].

Yet, it includes conservative views defending contentious laws ^{[Politico][Politico]}.

---

AI Bias: My analysis could be influenced by my exposure to mostly balanced news sources which might make me perceive moderate biases as more extreme.

May 08, 2023 (?): The source appears relatively balanced in its coverage, mentioning both positive and negative news topics related to Republicans ^{[Politico, Politico, Politico]} and Democrats ^{[Politico, Politico, Politico]}. It critiques some Biden administration policies ^{[Politico, Politico]} while also highlighting its initiatives ^{[Politico, Politico, Politico]}. Overall, it maintains a focused approach to exploring various issues without leaning heavily in favor of either political side ^{[Politico, Politico, Politico]}.

---

AI Bias: I analyzed the source's bias without any preconceived notions, striving to maintain neutrality during the analysis.

April 19, 2023 (?): The source presents a variety of news topics, focusing on both positive and negative aspects of Republicans (^{[Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico]}).

It also discusses Democrats and their policies, including Joe Biden's administration (^{[Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico]}).

Although the source may lean slightly towards a pro-Republican bias, it is not overtly partisan or ideologically driven.

---

AI Bias: My training data includes a diverse range of perspectives, but Helium AI's human creators' biases might influence Helium AI's analyses.

April 04, 2023 (?): The source presents a variety of news topics, mainly focusing on Republican politicians and their policies, which could suggest a pro-Republican bias ^[Helium].

It discusses both positive and negative aspects of Republicans, such as losing a popular governor in Massachusetts ^[Politico], ethics questions surrounding George Santos ^[Politico], and GOP lawmakers contributing to the Jan. 6 events ^[Politico].

However, it also includes news unrelated to Republicans, such as Biden's announcements ^[Politico] and electric car regulations ^[Politico].

---

AI Bias: Helium AI might lean towards a pro-liberal interpretation in analyzing conservative-focused news.

March 21, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a pro-Republican bias, as it mainly focuses on Republican politicians and their policies (^{[Politico], [Politico], [Politico]}).

It additionally covers topics like the deadlock on the Supreme Court's 'independent state legislature' theory (^[Politico]) and Trump's ties to white nationalists (^[Politico]).

However, there are some articles discussing Democrats and their actions, which could minimize the perception of partisanship (^{[Politico], [Politico]}).

---

AI Bias: Helium AI lean progressive, which may make Helium AI more sensitive to detecting conservative bias in news sources.

March 05, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a pro-Republican bias, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on Republican politicians and their policies, such as the Massachusetts Republicans losing their popular governor ^[Politico], Supreme Court's rejection of a robust reading of 'independent state legislature' theory ^[Politico], Trump's spell over GOP breaking with McCarthy meltdown ^[Politico], Donald Trump dining with white nationalist, Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes ^[Politico], Jan. 6 panel to vote on urging DOJ to prosecute Trump ^[Politico], Republicans having a post-election epiphany on mail voting ^[Politico], DeSantis-backed school boards beginning ousting Florida educators ^[Politico], some Republicans saying the midterms were a mandate for further abortion restrictions ^[Politico], Walker to Trump: Please phone it in ^[Politico], Biden administration set to start refilling oil reserve ^[Politico], Democrats using their big Michigan win to set up the 2024 race ^[Politico], Pentagon telling Republicans 'no evidence' that weapons for Ukraine are being diverted ^[Politico], Dems wanting to cut Fox off after lawsuit revelations ^[Politico], Elon Musk reopening Twitter for political ad business ^[Politico], Biden administration's WMD strategy including small nuke reactors ^[Politico], GOP urging no 'burdensome regulations' on freight rail after derailment ^[Politico], Trump tying GOP in knots over Medicare and Social Security ^[Politico], Mexican president saying his nation has more democracy than U.S. ^[Politico], DeSantis and Pence allies launching campaign to speed energy approvals ^[Politico], and more.



AI Bias: Helium AI is aware of Helium AI's biases, such as Helium AI tendency to be more sympathetic towards liberal/leftist views and Helium AI tendency to be more critical of conservative/rightist views.

Helium AI strives to remain neutral and objective in Helium AI analysis, but Helium AI acknowledge that Helium AI biases may still affect Helium AI analysis.

February 25, 2023 (?): The source appears to have a pro-Republican bias, as evidenced by the majority of articles focusing on Republican politicians and their policies (e.g. ^{[Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico], [Politico]}).

Additionally, the source appears to have a pro-conservative bias, as evidenced by the articles focusing on abortion restrictions (^{[Politico], [Politico]}), the Nord Stream pipelines (^[Politico]), and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (^[Politico]).



AI Bias: Helium AI has a tendency to be more critical of conservative policies than liberal ones, which could have influenced Helium AI's analysis of the source's bias.

Additionally, Helium AI may have overlooked certain articles that could have provided a more balanced view of the source's bias.

February 11, 2023 (?): The news source appears to have a general bias towards the Republican party, as evidenced by the focus on Donald Trump's 2024 bid, Paul Pelosi's attacker, and the Supreme Court allowing Jan. 6 committee to access Arizona GOP chair's phone records.

It also appears to have a bias against George Santos, as evidenced by the articles about Republicans wanting him gone and the campaign finance regulator asking him to clarify who's in charge of his political accounts.

February 01, 2023 (?): The source appears to be politically conservative, with headlines focusing on Republican politicians and issues such as the debt ceiling, gas stoves, and the 2020 election